User talk:Testales/Sarah Louise Young: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 86.16.115.126 - "→$1,000,000 for a single film: new section" |
Cleaned up |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{pornstars|class=start}} |
{{pornstars|class=start}} |
||
==Vandalism== |
|||
Somebody deleted "She became sexually active at age 13, but was ashamed of her rapidly developing body and frequently wore clothing which hid her figure." along with one of the external links. No reason was given, and I can't imagine any reason for these alterations, so I have reverted to the previous revision. Anybody wanting to make deletions should please discuss it here first, or at least give a reason in the edit. |
Somebody deleted "She became sexually active at age 13, but was ashamed of her rapidly developing body and frequently wore clothing which hid her figure." along with one of the external links. No reason was given, and I can't imagine any reason for these alterations, so I have reverted to the previous revision. Anybody wanting to make deletions should please discuss it here first, or at least give a reason in the edit. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Pirate2000|Pirate2000]] ([[User talk:Pirate2000|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pirate2000|contribs]]) 10:22, 17 August 2005</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
||
== Change of Sarah Young's measurments == |
== Change of Sarah Young's measurments == |
||
I have changed Sarah Young's measurements to a more creditable figure. I have taken the new measurements from a page on her official web site - http://sarahyoung.com/rankpages/featured.html. [[User:Mabal|Mabal]] |
I have changed Sarah Young's measurements to a more creditable figure. I have taken the new measurements from a page on her official web site - http://sarahyoung.com/rankpages/featured.html. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mabal|Mabal]] ([[User talk:Mabal|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mabal|contribs]]) 10:32, 5 October 2005</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
||
== Removal of |
== Removal of film title == |
||
I have removed the film "Even Hitler Had A Girlfriend" from the filmography. This is due to this Sarah Young not being in this film. I have a copy of the film, and although there is an actress in the film credited as Sarah Young, she is a totally different person to the Sarah Young detailed here. [[User:Mabal|Mabal]] |
I have removed the film "Even Hitler Had A Girlfriend" from the filmography. This is due to this Sarah Young not being in this film. I have a copy of the film, and although there is an actress in the film credited as Sarah Young, she is a totally different person to the Sarah Young detailed here. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mabal|Mabal]] ([[User talk:Mabal|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mabal|contribs]]) 10:38, 5 October 2005</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
||
:Well, that's good to know. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:ThePeg20:46, 10 August 2006|ThePeg20:46, 10 August 2006]] ([[User talk:ThePeg20:46, 10 August 2006|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ThePeg20:46, 10 August 2006|contribs]]) 22:14, 28 June 2006</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
|||
Well, that's good to know. ThePeg 2006 |
|||
== Source Material == |
== Source Material == |
||
The source material for the 09:44, 27 April 2006 revision are articles/interviews that were published in Cosmopolitan Magazine, Issue 2/96, February 1996 and LOADED Magazine (UK), Issue 10, February 1995. [[User:Mabal|Mabal]] |
The source material for the 09:44, 27 April 2006 revision are articles/interviews that were published in Cosmopolitan Magazine, Issue 2/96, February 1996 and LOADED Magazine (UK), Issue 10, February 1995. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mabal|Mabal]] ([[User talk:Mabal|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mabal|contribs]]) 09:52, 27 April 2006</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
||
== Reason for reversion of breast development age == |
== Reason for reversion of breast development age == |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
I have reverted the age at which Sarah Young's breast began to develop back to 10 in reference to an interview she gave to Cosmopolitan Magazine, February 1996, issue 2/96 where she says – |
I have reverted the age at which Sarah Young's breast began to develop back to 10 in reference to an interview she gave to Cosmopolitan Magazine, February 1996, issue 2/96 where she says – |
||
⚫ | {{quotation|I was ten and still at junior school when my breasts developed,” she says. “It became a real problem back then, because boys and girls changed for gym in the same room. I didn’t want to wear a bra because I would have been the only one. But I got teased mercilessly. I was so ashamed of my bust, I’d wear big jumpers to cover it up. In the end, arrangements were made for me to dress separately.}} |
||
Quote |
|||
<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mabal|Mabal]] ([[User talk:Mabal|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mabal|contribs]]) 22:14, 28 June 2006</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
|||
⚫ | |||
== $1,000,000 for a single film == |
== $1,000,000 for a single film == |
Revision as of 12:03, 8 February 2009
Biography: Actors and Filmmakers NA‑class | ||||||||||
|
Pornography NA‑class | |||||||
|
Vandalism
Somebody deleted "She became sexually active at age 13, but was ashamed of her rapidly developing body and frequently wore clothing which hid her figure." along with one of the external links. No reason was given, and I can't imagine any reason for these alterations, so I have reverted to the previous revision. Anybody wanting to make deletions should please discuss it here first, or at least give a reason in the edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pirate2000 (talk • contribs) 10:22, 17 August 2005
Change of Sarah Young's measurments
I have changed Sarah Young's measurements to a more creditable figure. I have taken the new measurements from a page on her official web site - http://sarahyoung.com/rankpages/featured.html. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mabal (talk • contribs) 10:32, 5 October 2005
Removal of film title
I have removed the film "Even Hitler Had A Girlfriend" from the filmography. This is due to this Sarah Young not being in this film. I have a copy of the film, and although there is an actress in the film credited as Sarah Young, she is a totally different person to the Sarah Young detailed here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mabal (talk • contribs) 10:38, 5 October 2005
- Well, that's good to know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThePeg20:46, 10 August 2006 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 28 June 2006
Source Material
The source material for the 09:44, 27 April 2006 revision are articles/interviews that were published in Cosmopolitan Magazine, Issue 2/96, February 1996 and LOADED Magazine (UK), Issue 10, February 1995. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mabal (talk • contribs) 09:52, 27 April 2006
Reason for reversion of breast development age
I have reverted the age at which Sarah Young's breast began to develop back to 10 in reference to an interview she gave to Cosmopolitan Magazine, February 1996, issue 2/96 where she says –
I was ten and still at junior school when my breasts developed,” she says. “It became a real problem back then, because boys and girls changed for gym in the same room. I didn’t want to wear a bra because I would have been the only one. But I got teased mercilessly. I was so ashamed of my bust, I’d wear big jumpers to cover it up. In the end, arrangements were made for me to dress separately.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mabal (talk • contribs) 22:14, 28 June 2006
$1,000,000 for a single film
I'd be interested to see a source for this claim. I have a good idea of the economic realities of porn, and even back in the higher-budget days this would have been a ridiculous figure. If true, I suspect it was her husband paying her this sum (and therefore having no net impact on their joint assets), just for publicity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.16.115.126 (talk) 11:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)