Jump to content

User talk:Meinsla: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Meinsla (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
LUVLEE17 (talk | contribs)
Line 8: Line 8:


:As for TigerDirect filtering its own reviews on its own web site, there's nothing that can be done about that. Every review has to be approved by TigerDirect themselves, so good luck getting a negative one through. [[User:meinsla|<font color="DarkOrange">'''meinsla'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:meinsla|'''<font color="DarkGray">talk</font>''']]</sup> 18:09, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
:As for TigerDirect filtering its own reviews on its own web site, there's nothing that can be done about that. Every review has to be approved by TigerDirect themselves, so good luck getting a negative one through. [[User:meinsla|<font color="DarkOrange">'''meinsla'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:meinsla|'''<font color="DarkGray">talk</font>''']]</sup> 18:09, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
************************************************************************************************
Tiger direct has been in business since 1987, they are obviously doing something right to continue to grow they way they do. With an A rating on BBB.org and a 9.10 on reseller ratings, it looks like the masses agree Tiger Direct is a great place to shop.


== hi sir ==
== hi sir ==

Revision as of 13:52, 12 February 2009

Tiger Direct

Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ATiger_Direct&diff=224301320&oldid=219762154 This allegation should be fairly easy to document using WebCite, showing a before and after, no? If you can do so, you'd have some important info that would merit inclusion in the article. You can reply here; I'm watching this page.--IRDT.

I'm really not sure if this will determine anything. I am not sure how to use this WebCite but don't you have to set it up beforehand? I think a lot of the damage is already done. And it appears that TigerDirect cares more these days about its image than in the past and has done a fairly good job cleaning up. I know several sites that documented TigerDirect's scams and horrible business practices somehow mysteriously vanished from the web while others merely redirect to the TigerDirect web site itself. It seems TigerDirect is finally concerned with its image and wants to at least appear to want to make things right. On sites like resellerratings.com and such, TigerDirect will reply to negative reviews and work with the customer to make sure he is satisfied. But I am very sure this is only because the review was posted in the first place. Those who just opt to call customer support get nothing but the runaround.
As for TigerDirect filtering its own reviews on its own web site, there's nothing that can be done about that. Every review has to be approved by TigerDirect themselves, so good luck getting a negative one through. meinsla talk 18:09, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger direct has been in business since 1987, they are obviously doing something right to continue to grow they way they do. With an A rating on BBB.org and a 9.10 on reseller ratings, it looks like the masses agree Tiger Direct is a great place to shop.

hi sir

uss wasp etc vtol aircraft carrier us navy have 12 wasp class ship compare uk navy aircraft carrier and uss wasp big, thailand aircraft carrier —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tf20000 (talkcontribs) 22:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interested Editors needed

Hello. I am looking for people who would like to help building the following article. It is currently in need of practical people who appreciate reality. If I could get people who are interesting in the medical aspects of living on a extra solar planet (people NOT bacteria), that is what is survivable/tolerable/habitable, it would be great. I am lacking in experience in finding the right people to edit this article that we are trying to finish.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Explodicle/Planetary_human_habitability http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Explodicle/Planetary_human_habitability

GabrielVelasquez (talk) 21:29, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the link would be an accurate example of bias in Conservapedia, but I'm willing to take my edit to the talk page and see if we can gain consensus about whether or not source linked to is reliable enough to be in the article.--ParisianBlade (talk) 23:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Paisa
Chuck Person
Pluto Water
The Farm (San Francisco)
EICAR
Debi Nova
HOOAH! Bar
ClamWin
Joseph Henry Lynch
Milton Himmelfarb
Initiative for Software Choice
ADS
Taradise
The Wacky Adventures of Ronald McDonald
WCWM
Chicken Selects
Görükle
Lean Beef Burger
Cleanup
Kazaa Lite
Armed forces
They (film)
Merge
Military of Hungary
List of solar system objects by radius
List of universities in India
Add Sources
Panda Software
Mikel Urizarbarrena
Norman (anti virus)
Wikify
Verbal offence
Vijayanta
Arcas
Expand
Proposed country
The Harker School
Economic conscription

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:15, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]