User talk:Emarsee

Welcome to Emarsee’s talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

• Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.

Thus, if I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.

• Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.

• Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
• Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.

• To initiate a new conversation on this page click on this link.
• Remember to post new messages at the bottom of my talk page.
• You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).
• Thank you. єmarsee ^(Discuss)

Talk Page Archives

1 2 3 4

Speedy deletion of File:Ckpgtv.png

A tag has been placed on File:Ckpgtv.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Ckpgtv.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Emarsee ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 20:39, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:Cjntmontreal.PNG

A tag has been placed on File:Cjntmontreal.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Cjntmontreal.PNG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Emarsee ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 20:42, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

To Whom It May Concern :

Hello,

I am very sorry to this result. However, I have just made an account on Wikipedia-- and are not that familiar with these sort of guidelines (Yes, I have read the beginners section) I am shocked by your warnings towards me; even though I have presented thus, evidence of the truth.

Such as? I would like you and me to agree upon this conflict between Greater and Metro Vancouver Personally , I would go with both because the district still uses Greater Vancouver in the water and plumage systems.

Hopefully you can agree upon with me ; I am just fixing up some sentence flaws, I am unclear of how this is called Vandalism [Yes again, I have read through the guidelines, however to this myself I am unclear]

PS. The Picture about Arbutus Ridge is looking upon Downtown Vancouver ; to be more specific.

Thank you in regards; Please talk to me if you have any concerns or questions.

Thank you the most sincerely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iiarecooll (talk • contribs) 03:19, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello again Emarsee,

Yes - Although on The Weather Network uses Greater Vancouver.

Secondly, Personally I think It doesn't really matter if the media uses Metro Vancouver. It is not exactly 100% official that Greater Vancouver is destroyed or not used anymore, and that Metro Vancouver is replaced entirely. It is only still under construction. It focuses more on the people, a whole lot of the population still don't know about the name change and still name Greater Vancouver. One of my friends from England, thought it was a train system running in Vancouver.

Anyway; I do not want to argue about the funny things on this Christmas Holiday ; all on all peace?

And yes you are right the mountains are focused on West** Vancouver. Not Vancouver West :)

However there is a flaw in the structure I wanted to edit out earlier View of ___what___ from Arbutus Ridge...etc

Thanks and Regards Peace

Lets just dont talk about this anymore Its getting on me :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iiarecooll (talk • contribs) 04:56, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:CFJC-TV.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:CFJC-TV.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:CHAT TV 2008.png)

Thanks for uploading File:CHAT TV 2008.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:CHECK News.png)

Thanks for uploading File:CHECK News.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cjntmontreal.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:Cjntmontreal.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ckpgtv.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Ckpgtv.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

As to your talk regards Metro Vancouver and against TransLink; the ORIGINAL NAME WAS NOT South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority. It was the Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority, and before that - was BCTransit, BC'S Transit System.

It is TransLink because it would be a "a nickname" for GVTA / SCBCTA as of JAN/1/08.

As of Metro Vancouver, it is not the same. People still use Metro Vancouver only for media and district as of Official Name, HOWEVER; the population does not use the name Metro Vancouver in many cases;

a. it's hard to understand for tourists from countries
b. it does not make sense in directories (EG YellowPages - they use Vancouver and areas surrounding it)

The concept I am trying to get here Emarsee is that Greater Vancouver is still in use, and thus - It is not an authority that you may choose to take down the old name, Greater Vancouver

Towards your talk about the RADIO STATION THAT USES METRO VANCOUVER:

As you said, Mr 'Emarsee' - the media does not Matter, as suppose you said awhile ago.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iiarecooll (talk • contribs) 06:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes, what you said is true;

HOWEVER-

It may matter due to the population if the district calls Vancouver ; Supercali..etc People will not have interest in the name; which will make the district change the name

And as well Toronto does not use the name Metro Toronto ; it uses GTA [Greater Toronto Area] if you may not have already known.

Metro Toronto is only Applied as in professionally - it is not a thing used; and it is not a legal name.

Although people say that Metro Vancouver does not make sense; even when the district uses it; It might be helpful posting up the old name / and the new name

eg? Preceding Name : Greater Vancouver

      New Official Name as of 2008: Metro Vancouver

Helping me, helping others; and helping everybody. thanks as people are confused ; it'll be helpful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iiarecooll (talk • contribs) 06:27, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

As Well,

the term Lower Mainland is used against the people; even though its not official to the district and not legally correct, and the district has control but, -- everyone uses it. which led to even the district itself.

Now, People does matter.

However I do want to end this very childish argument -

Thanks and hope to get this solved.

Iiarecooll (talk) 06:32, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Also,

Lower Mainland is applied as Metro Vancouver

So Lower Mainland still takes in effect.

Greater Vancouver, and its surroundings, although Greater Vancouver still makes more sense -- Metro Vancouver is more of a legal name Even the Directories uses Greater Vancouver. Everyone. except for the Media and District itself.

The Main concept ; Greater Vancouver and Metro Vancouver should still be used in the Metro Vancouver page, and as well to include both histories as of dates.

eg. TransLink's new official name and old "Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority"

Thanks Iiarecooll (talk) 06:35, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Pardon, user Emarsee

Could we please end this childish argumentation, as you please.

I understand the fact; and I know what I've done wrong as a "beginner" on Wikipedia. I am sorry,

and as you please STOP this argumentation about Metro Vancouver

Iiarecooll (talk) 06:45, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

CJCO-TV

The "images cannot be added purely for decorative purposes" rationale applies only to images that are licensed under fair use. It's irrelevant if the image is licensed under GFDL; images uploaded to Wikipedia under GFDL, CC or public domain licensing can always be in the article whether they're purely "decorative" or not. Bearcat (talk) 21:48, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

A-Channel Ottawa Slogans

A-Channel Ottawa Slogans

Can someone please explain why they always haev to revert my edits for A-Channel Slogans

like This is Ottawa's News , Watch A-Channel News at 6, Ottawa's Fastest Growing News Hour

as theese were the Slogans

if people keep Reverting this

i been watching Chro-tv since 98

so i know what there slogans were —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.42.232 (talk) 06:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

CKPM-FM categories

Hey Emarsee, I'm interested in your comment where you say "Only COL should be in category". Is that a Wiki rule (I searched but couldn't find anything), or an assumption? I ask because although CKPM is to be located in Port Moody, it is a radio station specifically targeting the entire Tri-Cities. Thanks. Greg Salter (talk) 00:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Mystery TV.gif)

You've uploaded File:Mystery TV.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:22, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

CTVgm template

Are you a CTV employee? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.135.110 (talk) 13:40, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

A (TV system)

In the case you're wondering why I've made some minor changes is that to avoid confusion with the indefinite article, the system's name is often marked with single quotes as 'A'. It says so on their website www.atv.ca why not on wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.135.110 (talk) 22:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Schd1.svg)

You've uploaded File:Schd1.svg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

CRTC

Looks like they've finally switched everything over to the new url format, so for the moment almost all of our weblinks to CRTC decisions are dead (except for a few that I manually updated today.) I've put in a request with WP:AWB to see if we can automate the changeover, since for the most part it's actually a fairly simple middle-of-the-url text substitution. I'll keep you updated on the response. Bearcat (talk) 04:18, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

That certainly is news to me, haven't heard anything about the CRTC changing their URLs. Thanks for the info though, I will be using my newly granted AWB powers to change the URLs of the CRTC decisions. єmarsee ^(Discuss) 06:21, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Superc1.svg)

You've uploaded File:Superc1.svg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Superc2.svg)

You've uploaded File:Superc2.svg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:05, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Superc3.svg)

You've uploaded File:Superc3.svg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:05, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Superc4.svg)

You've uploaded File:Superc4.svg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:05, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

CKMO

In case you didn't know, there's actually a "licensee =" option in the radio station infobox template, which basically does exactly what you wanted your edit to do, right down to the smaller font size and the parentheses :-) Bearcat (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Granville Island Water Taxi?

Can you pls help me understand why you deleted my addition to the Transportation in Vancouver page? This is a private company (I have no business interest) offering a new transportation option for people who might wish to visit Bowen Island. I use it all the time, as do lots of others who live out here. Why is this different than the Aquabus listed on the page, or the private charter service that runs scenic tours of the park?

In November 2008, the private company Granville Island Water Taxi introduced daily scheduled foot-passenger service between Granville Island and Snug Cove, Bowen Island. The 12-passenger vessel Eagle XXX takes approximately 25 minutes to make the crossing, and runs as many as 16 trips per day in either direction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesglave (talk • contribs) 17:20, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Wiki policy change??

Did Wikipedia change "Move" page option is reserved for registered user only? --142.22.48.251 (talk) 19:17, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

CHFR-FM

Hi there, sorry I wasn't sure what frequency to put in for CHFR-FM, I believe they now operate at 96.5 FM, instead of 91.5 FM so I left it blank because I wasn't quite sure. I checked the recent CRTC decision on CHFR Hornby Island and its at 96.5 FM as of 2007, while Recnet says it operates at 91.5 FM which may be outdated. Once again, i'm sorry for removing the frequency from the Northern Vancouver Island template. The next time i'll leave it until I make the official change(s). User_talk:Webfan29 20:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC).

Employer list for discussion, addition

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam # Spamming "top" Canada employers

A (TV system)

Just to let you know: To avoid confusion with the indefinite article Emarsee. The system's name often uses single quotes on them as 'A' as they already use on their website (www.atv.ca).

Loblaw and Real Canadian Superstore articles

Thanks for your help in reverting changes to these articles. I requested page protection for both, but got turned down. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 16:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks again for getting the protection in. (Of course, I can just predict what's going to happen; next week the store will change all the signs to the new logo! - just kidding, I hope) :) --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 09:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Just thought you might want to know..

89.5 - KHNC, Seattle, WA in your list points to a different one in Johnstown, CO. OlEnglish (talk) 02:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I keep on getting the H and the N mixed up, but it's not that much of a problem. Thanks. :)

Vancouver

A note regarding the issue of census for Vancouver that may interest you has been made at Talk:Vancouver#Census. Mkdw^talk 17:32, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Criticism section of Gateway Program article

The wikipedia guidelines (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Criticism_sections) state that it is preferable to move statements from the general criticism section to the relevant section. The guidelines state : "While sometimes appropriate, this structure is not optimal, as relegating all criticisms to one section usually results in an unbalanced presentation. When present, such sections should be considered a temporary solution until the article is restructured to integrate criticism into each relevant section. It may then be desirable to have a "General criticisms" section near the end of the article, for those points which did not neatly fit anywhere else."

The edits I made clearly are meant to follow the Wikipedia guidelines. Why are you changing them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.83.221 (talk) 20:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)