Talk:Monticello, New York: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:54, 17 February 2009

Cities Unassessed

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

New York (state) Unassessed

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

What should be included?

wish i could add more, i mean it is my home town but i dont know what would be allowed.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.205.186.41 (talk • contribs)

The racino is a miserable faliure and shouldnt be put in the article. I mean we have lots of low income housing developments but we dont say anything about that. Oh yeah and crime.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.179.123.111 (talk • contribs)

The racino is a very important part of the area. It certainly should be mentioned in the article. BTW the payouts there are excellent. On the other hand, NY Lotto is the world's biggest ripoff, since only 40% of sales are used for prizes. 216.179.123.111 13:51, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

interesting facts

this was removed for no reason, dont worry I put it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.228.169.184 (talk) 00:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This section belongs in this page for the following reasons:

1. It has been for a while 2. its well written 3. Its not decreasing the quality of the page 4. the title itself is catchy 5. it summarizes the basic points very well. 6. it is not a trivia section (even if it was i dont see the problem with trivia sections) 7. no one else seems to have a problem with it 8. it give this article a nice personal touch 9. it lists facts that have no other appropriate place in the article. 72.228.169.184 (talk) 00:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]