Jump to content

Talk:Shivraj Patil: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Btarun - "→‎Controversies section: "
Btarun (talk | contribs)
Line 22: Line 22:


Mr Sarcasticidealist, I am not trying to add something trivial here. There were more than 20 bomb blasts during his tenure as a home minister. He has changed clothes thrice in few hours while there were horrific serial bomb blasts and deaths in the country. Don't you think that this point shows that he is least bothered about the bomb blasts and expressed his least interest in tackling the investigation and rescue efforts. Have you even googled his name? Please try it and see what comes out as results. Come back to me with 1 link which mentions his efficiency or anything good about him. What is wrong in saying that he consistently refused to revive tough anti-terror laws? I've cited 3 references with links showing his own statements. When there are news articles and videos showing his statements again and again saying that he won't revive anti-terror laws, what makes you think that you can delete the article ruthlessly. Please try to know about Shivraj Patil and dare to see his interviews and then come here to delete the stuff. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Btarun|Btarun]] ([[User talk:Btarun|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Btarun|contribs]]) 00:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Mr Sarcasticidealist, I am not trying to add something trivial here. There were more than 20 bomb blasts during his tenure as a home minister. He has changed clothes thrice in few hours while there were horrific serial bomb blasts and deaths in the country. Don't you think that this point shows that he is least bothered about the bomb blasts and expressed his least interest in tackling the investigation and rescue efforts. Have you even googled his name? Please try it and see what comes out as results. Come back to me with 1 link which mentions his efficiency or anything good about him. What is wrong in saying that he consistently refused to revive tough anti-terror laws? I've cited 3 references with links showing his own statements. When there are news articles and videos showing his statements again and again saying that he won't revive anti-terror laws, what makes you think that you can delete the article ruthlessly. Please try to know about Shivraj Patil and dare to see his interviews and then come here to delete the stuff. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Btarun|Btarun]] ([[User talk:Btarun|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Btarun|contribs]]) 00:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


Moreover that controversies article was present since Feb 21, 2009. I've added 1 more controversy about anti-terror laws, then you deleted not only my comments but also the earlier one.

Revision as of 00:52, 21 March 2009

WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
WikiProject iconIndia: Politics Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup.

Sri Shivraj v patil at home minister in indian govt —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.188.183 (talk) 12:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies section

Controversies section was present since 21 February 2009. It was added by LilHelpa user. It had valid references and citations. I don't know why Sarcasticidealist user deleted it. I'm restoring it. This is an incident happened and thousands of news articles are available to prove it. Deleting this incident which had all the valid proofs is not considered neutral. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Btarun (talkcontribs) 00:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The bit about changing his clothes is clearly a minor issue; including it here, especially with its own heading, presents clear issues of undue weight. As for the part about his stance on anti-terror laws, there may be room to include that, but it needs to be described in a neutral tone. "He consistently refused to revive tough anti terror laws" clearly doesn't even come close. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 00:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Sarcasticidealist, I am not trying to add something trivial here. There were more than 20 bomb blasts during his tenure as a home minister. He has changed clothes thrice in few hours while there were horrific serial bomb blasts and deaths in the country. Don't you think that this point shows that he is least bothered about the bomb blasts and expressed his least interest in tackling the investigation and rescue efforts. Have you even googled his name? Please try it and see what comes out as results. Come back to me with 1 link which mentions his efficiency or anything good about him. What is wrong in saying that he consistently refused to revive tough anti-terror laws? I've cited 3 references with links showing his own statements. When there are news articles and videos showing his statements again and again saying that he won't revive anti-terror laws, what makes you think that you can delete the article ruthlessly. Please try to know about Shivraj Patil and dare to see his interviews and then come here to delete the stuff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Btarun (talkcontribs) 00:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Moreover that controversies article was present since Feb 21, 2009. I've added 1 more controversy about anti-terror laws, then you deleted not only my comments but also the earlier one.