User talk:Dar book

Please click here to leave a new message. Thank you.

If you have any problems with images which I have uploaded, kindly report it here. Thank you.

Marikina Science High School

please add a sched of enrollment and opening of classes. thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesmatthewdwong (talk • contribs) 15:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

edit query

I am sorry if I offended you; but please what reason did you have for this edit to my user page? Anthony Appleyard 09:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Who's your Mommy?

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Who's your Mommy?, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Who's your Mommy?. Ridernyc (talk) 16:19, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Members Church of God Edits

I noticed that you have on several occasions reverted pages related to Members Church of God. The content that you find objectionable is legitimate and documented as pertaining to the legal difficulties of the group and its leader. While it may be embarassing to members of the group, it is appropriate content for the page, and it is written from a neutral standpoint. Flagging a user for vandalism is also not appropriate when the page was clearly not vandalized. In order to avert an edit war, I felt that I should contact you directly first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.212.206.99 (talk) 20:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Darwin! As a member of Church of God International headed by Eli Soriano it may be a good idea to refrain from making large POV edits to the Eli Soriano article. Such edits would constitute WP:COI and could lead to your being banned from editing the article altogether. Also, self-serving statements issued by Soriano himself or his church don't qualify as reliable third party references according to WP:VERIFIABILITY. Thank you. - Shannon Rose (talk) 15:37, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough! Tag the statement as unsourced and after a week or two, if no one will oppose it, I will remove that part. I have noticed that a number of claims are unsourced, tag all the unsourced claims you can find. - Shannon Rose (talk) 19:41, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Uh, I'm not a member of the Members Church of God International. The only reason why I defend this article because I don't like false facts. Dar book (talk) 11:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello, you have already admitted your membership in Members Church of God International in my talk page when you replied my 15:37, 15 June 2008 message here to you (kindly scroll up a bit and review it) with "I understand that" on 11:55, 16 June 2008. That line alone ("I understand that") clearly constitutes admission of every point I raised. Then, two days after you wrote that admission, you have decided to deny your membership for obvious reasons. Please do not insult the intelligence of other WP editors. Just a friendly reminder, a religion that forces you to a corner where you have to resort to lying, upon reflection, may not be the kind of religion that you really wanted to be in. - Shannon Rose (talk) 18:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

It seems that you have removed my comment to you eh? Let's just be freinds okay. I'm only 14 years old. Do you have a Facebook account? Dar book (talk) 08:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

You are far from unbiased Dar Book, and your recent edits do not "prove" you to be so as you claim. Please do not insult my intelligence by suggesting that you are not an MCOG member. It is obvious that you are, as your comments are seldom, if ever, neutral, and always serve to advocate the positions and status of the church. Any inquiry by WP into your posts would indicate this. If you are not a member "on paper", then you are simply playing semantics, as you are an outspoken advocate for the group. Please also do not suggest to me that an edit war is something that I should be concerned about, as each of the edits I have made to this page are clearly neutral and encyclopedic, and I will continue to act in this fashion. Edits are not made or avoided because another user might not like certain information being shared - that is something the MCOG can do on its own web site. It is you who should be concerned about an edit war - if your pattern of adding unverifiable content, and removal of factual and encyclopedic content continues, it is likely that you would be barred from further edits to the Members Church of God page. I do monitor this page as it is clear that members of the church would use it as propaganda were they allowed to. Absurd, undocumented claims are frequently made, as well as legitimate content being removed. 50%quick (talk) 14:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I admit that I am an outspoken advocate for the group but yet what is wrong with my edits, i'ts best that we remove the sentence in the particular article which we are fighting about. Also, somebody added a citation needed to the sentence which I didn't remove. I'll try my best to be neutral. Dar book (talk) 10:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Marikina Science High Logo

Piece of question, you said that you, with the teachers, made the logo. This is made as in designed and created from scratch, or you made it in the computer from a preexisting logo (digitised)? Because if it is a logo then the school and/or the government (republic of the Philippines) is/are the owner of the copyrights of the logo, and only they have the right to release it to public domain. Unless they actually did release it to public domain, the liscence tag in the image is flawed. -- Felipe Aira 11:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Unlike other schools, the MSHS can be released free from the school's computer IT section. Which means it is under public domain. Dar book (talk) 01:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Redirects

Stop removing the redirects on the episode pages. Rau J16 11:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

No way man, well okay. But DO NOT DELETE THE REDIRECT ARTICLE. It's because I haven't watched the Avatar episode yet. Dar book (talk) 11:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Just because you havent watched it yet does not give cause to the article to be there. Rau J16 11:21, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Joseph Anton Koch

A tag has been placed on Joseph Anton Koch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 11:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

If you would like to contest the speedy deletion of Joseph Anton Koch, please leave a message on the article's talk page explaining why you think it should be kept. Thank you. Tonywalton ^Talk 11:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiCookie

Just stopping by with wikicookies for those editors who started new articles today. --Rosiestep (talk) 07:09, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Tagalog

Template:Tagalog has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --- RockMFR 03:47, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Eliseo Soriano

Hi. I would like to explain a couple of things about the Eliseo Soriano article to make sure that you understand what is meant by some of the phrases. These are subtle matters which might easily be misunderstood by if you are not a native English speaker.

1. We say "rape case" not "alleged rape case" because the case is real, not alleged. There actually is a court case about this. This does not mean that Soriano is guilty. The rape itself is only an allegation so it is correct to say "alleged rape". Despite this it is not correct to say "alleged rape case". I have corrected the title.
2. I think you may have confused the words "fond" and "fund". "fond of criticising" means "likes to criticise". "funds criticism" means "pays money for criticising". "Fond" has nothing to do with money. Despite this, I am not going to put "fond" back in because it is unnecessary and your wording is simpler, more neutral and less likely to be misunderstood.

--DanielRigal (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tremorton City

An article that you have been involved in editing, Tremorton City, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tremorton City. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Schuym1 (talk) 01:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Seen it. Dar book (talk) 08:21, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Hi, CheckUser confirmed that you recently created a sockpuppet called Defenz 07 and used it to make extreme POV edits to the Eli Soriano, Ang Dating Daan, Members Church of God International, and related articles. Aside from that you also own a host of other accounts. I will be very kind to you this time, cultic-brainwashing is hard to fight and sometimes even requires the assistance of a professional therapist. But the moment you do anything again to manipulate those and other related articles, I am going to report you for indefinite blocking, and make sure that no matter what computer and username you use you won't be able to edit WP ever again. Please note that your Good Morning Kuya spam has already been deleted. I urge you to stop using WP to promote your fugitive criminal religious leader and his numerous businesses. – Shannon Rose (talk) 14:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks you for your kindness. I'll be dormant for a while about the three articles, yet why did you delete the Good Morning Kuya article, it is true and ask somebody about it. I will still edit other non religious articles, except Most Holy Church of God in Christ Jesus, please warn me if I make any mistake. Well, goodbye. Dar book (talk) 08:34, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Eli Soriano. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Shannon Rose (talk) 18:38, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

I note that you are editing articles with which you have a personal connection, such as articles related to Eli Soriano, Ang Dating Daan and Members Church of God International. You have quite strong opinions about the above; I think it'd be better if you took your edits to the talk page, or to an RFC if they're being consistently rejected. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 16:02, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Where should I add the RFC? Dar book (talk) 05:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Spam in Itanong mo kay Soriano

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Itanong mo kay Soriano, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Itanong mo kay Soriano is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Itanong mo kay Soriano, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:50, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Teenage Robot episode.

Hey, I saw the two half episodes twice on Nicktoons Network for it's premiere, and I know it's a real episode. So that means theres an unaired episode on the article that seems fake. Write back please. --Wikialexdx (talk) 01:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Ang Dating Daan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Telebisyo.com discussion forum entries and Yehey.com blog posts violates WP:RS, which clearly states that "Reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand." The author of your Telebisyo.com discussion forum entry "reference" is anonymous and the author of your Yehey.com blog post "reference" calls him/herself "Popz Cooler". By using such things as reference you are, in effect, destroying the credibility of WP. If you can find articles from reputable newspapers or respected third-party websites that support your original research then your edits will be most welcome. – Shannon Rose (talk) 18:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Inquirer.net is a relialbe source, you rejected it. So what if it doesen't mention the "ang dating daan" name, it's an obvious parody. Anyway, it already non-promotional information. Stop belittleling (sorry if my spelling is wrong) Philippine-related articles as unnotable. Like you previously did to Daniel Razon and Good Morning Kuya. Dar book (Complains?) 08:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Inquirer.net is indeed a reliable resource but the particular Inquirer.net article that you used as reference never mentioned that the Ang Dating Doon segment is a parody of Ang Dating Daan (which is actually the point of using a reference). In fact, the name of the program Ang Dating Daan cannot be found anywhere on that Inquirer.net article. Therefore, it does not qualify as reference, not because Inquirer.net is not reliable, but because the idea that you're trying to convey is not supported by the article. Dar book, it is actually you who is bellittling Philippine-related articles by your reckless and uneducated editing. If you truly value Philippine-related articles then you should be extra careful not to destroy their quality and credibility. Also, since you are editing the Tagalog Wikipedia, may I suggest that you begin creating a Tagalog version of the English WP articles on Eli soriano and Ang Dating Daan? If you don't do it, someone else is going to do it sooner or later. The information on the different language versions of WP must match (or at least approximate) the best and most comprehensive article, which in the case of Eli Soriano and Ang Dating Daan happens to be the English version. – Shannon Rose (talk) 20:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

At least I don't keep adding {{db-spam}} to articles that looks promotional and unfamiliar to me. I'm not that reckless, you only think I'm reckless because our opinions about the articles abouve do not match. You don't like unsourced information, but I can't do anything because I can't find a THIRD-PARTY, reliable sources. Probably because nobody is interested in writing about the articles above in their well-known magazines. (I've been searching for a reference about the # of members but can't find references that match WP:RS). It's obvious that your not a Filipino, because you don't know the Philippine Web Awards and probably you don't know AnakTV Awards (don't worry, ADD shows do not win there). I hope you can know more on these award giving bodies, so that (I hope) you stop questioning their reliability. Dar book (Complains?) 05:49, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Unblock

{unblock-auto|1=222.127.223.75|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Tanggalin". The reason given for Tanggalin's block is: "Vandalism-only account". Also, I am not associated with this user.|3=Ryulong|4=1259824}

Avatar roll call

The Avatar: The Last Airbender task force is having a roll call. Please add yourself to the list via this link if you intend to still be active with the project.

Cheers, NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 21:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

The Bereans

I did some research and I have to agree with you that it is only this Bereans website that is openly labelling Soriano's group as a cult. Who are these Bereans anyway? They are completely unnotable and I am yet to encounter anyone who actually belongs to this anti-cult group? Chances are they are also a cult group, or even a ghost religion (one that exists only in the Internet). I don't think that articles from the Bereans website qualify as reliable third-party published source as per WP:RS. If you remove all the Bereans references in the Ang Dating Daan article and replace them all with citation needed tags, we can probably remove all of those unsourced statements within a month's time. It is unfair to use critical quotes from websites of other religious organizations because of the obvious bias. Quotes should be either from notable newspapers, magazines and books (self-published books not included). As I will never use articles from Soriano's website(s) to criticize, say for example, the Baptist sect, I would also not use articles from a Baptist website to criticize Soriano's sect. The rules must be applied to all for the interest of fairness and equality. – Shannon Rose (talk) 23:34, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Article Rescue Squadron

I noticed that you are part of Category:Wikipedians against notability.

I would like to invite you to join the Article Rescue Squadron. Although Rescue Squadron members do not share any official position on notability, and are simply focused on rescuing articles for deletion, you may find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Caveat: I am writing this as an individual, not as a representative of Article Rescue Squadron. Ikip (talk) 19:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I'll think about it. Dar book (Complains?) 07:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Please comment

Hi there. As a fellow WP:AVATAR member, can you please check out Talk:Aang#Hair color? NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 17:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

March 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eli Soriano, you will be blocked from editing. Apart from removing reliable third-party published sources you also removed the link to [this video reference] saying that it does not exist anymore when it very well does! – Shannon Rose (talk) 12:29, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about that....probably because when I tried accesing the video, it lagged. Dar book (Complains?) 11:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)