User talk:The Thing That Should Not Be

Gastrulation edit?

I know my edit was not done correctly, as I don't know how to add the box to the top to state no references are cited. If you are going to correct what I have done wrong, could you please add the box stating that there are actually no citations rather than just leaving it in the state it was before. It still needs citations! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.37.99 (talk) 13:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC) who are you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.78.179.30 (talk) 22:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Multiple warnings?

Hi
How come you leave editors both a level 1 and a level 2 warning for the same edit? See e.g. User talk:201.150.75.243, User talk:24.206.231.192, User talk:68.174.25.247, User talk:68.22.199.125, User talk:96.237.237.139. With User talk:24.206.231.192 there were 54 seconds between the two warnings, so it looks like a manual thing and no Huggle trouble.
Cheers, Amalthea 21:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Not stalking... just experimenting with AWB

Hey, in case you were wondering why I've been making a whole bunch of edits to stuff that may be on your watchlist, I started experimenting with the features of AWB, one of them being "User contribs (user defined number)" which I just typed your username and typed 5000. So yeah, don't get creeped out. By the way, hi! :) - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 07:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

My edits

My edit to the Adrian Peterson article is correct. If you click the source you will see this. It is not vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.151.245 (talk) 22:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Rainbow coloured dogs

If you don't mind too much could you have a look at University of Calgary ? I seem to have got into a revert war with UniversityDetectives over his Dog section. I thought I would drag a 3rd person in, you :) for another opinion. Thanks.  FrostedΔ14  03:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

So... I'm starting to like your code on your userpage more and more

wanna help me code mine?  :) - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 21:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Ask J.delanoy about it. He's the person that did my userpage. Until It Sleeps 02:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Userpage

I was just about to edit your userpage for you and got that rather clever message ;-). Anyway just thought I would point out a missed letter in one of your sentances. "My most active month so far has been January, with over 6,000 edits. Nice userpage coding. Uksam88 (talk) 19:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

YFixed — Jake Wartenberg 21:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh... thanks for telling me that Uksam88, and for doing that for me JW. Until It Sleeps 02:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Bobby Sands...

...was a terrorist scumbag. I don't think this is currently reflected in his article. I'm going to add a POV tag. 91.108.218.211 (talk) 20:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Point taken, but the edit itself was not vandalism. 91.108.218.211 (talk) 20:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Right, so I won't include that in my editing of the article, but the FACT still remains that Mr Sands was (hahaha "was" as in "no longer is") a terrorist scumbag. 91.108.218.211 (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Come come now

I supported your RfA, so you could cut a brutha a break. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.128.159.114 (talk) 02:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

And... exactly how could you have supported it? Barring that you have made no edits to it, I must also note that IP editors can't vote in RfA's... Until It Sleeps 02:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Jesus Christ man, do you suppose I don't have accounts here?

And, exactly what would those accounts be anyways? Until It Sleeps 02:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

What a question. Surely you jest. Now please, don't attempt to adjust your television set. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LemuelJohnston (talk • contribs) 03:57, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Wilerch

appears to have been attempting to remove a serious BLP violation (added by User:.152.24.176)[1]. I think you may owe him an apology. His blanking of the page previously was wrong to start with, but the latest attempts are just removing a category that is highly inappropriate - Pederast. Mfield (talk) 03:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I believe Wizardman may have already mentioned this to you, but this kind of situation is clearly spelled out at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Dealing_with_edits_by_the_subject_of_the_article. Daniel (talk) 04:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Message

How is it, wanna explain what you're doing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.116.30.34 (talk) 03:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Advertising article

Hey what is your problem? You can't just go around erasing other peoples edits. Please stop or I will find a mod and tell them about this.