User talk:UniversityDetectives

Rainbow coloured dogs

Your additions to University of Calgary look to me like a hoax. The provided (malformed) reference links to a Wolfenstein 3D page, nothing about dogs. This is why I have reverted it. FrostedΔ14 02:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See also my comments on Talk:University of Calgary. Student newspapers tend not to be reliable sources, especially not with a claim that, frankly, reads like it should be in the April 1 edition of the paper. —C.Fred (talk) 03:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding the claims to the article, you'll need to find reliable sources that discuss it. Right now, you've provided no sources at all that discuss the claim. —C.Fred (talk) 03:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page University of Calgary has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. FrostedΔ14 02:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:50, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Nexus: The Kingdom of the Winds has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/user/int3rnaut). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:01, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]