Talk:Aglossa cuprina: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:26, 11 April 2009

A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on early 2009. Further details are available here.

Arthropods Unassessed

	Arthropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Discussion

Wording of the first sentence in the 'Distribution' section... I think the first sentence under the 'Distribution' heading needs to be reworded because you stated that "A. cuprina has been found in a number of countries worldwide" and then you go on to list both countries and continents. In class Dr. Brundage said there was very little information out there on this insect; you guys really put together an informative article though! Good job. Mehermance (talk) 22:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mehermance! Great point - what you have said makes complete sense. I'll get to editing. Thanks for your feedback!Nanayaagh (talk) 05:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, good job because we also had a sp. that didn't yield much at all. Only thing I think you could improve on is a few more links within the paragraphs. When I get into the depth of the paragraph a "non" entomologist might want to do some further investigation on subjects presneted.Robertsonza7 (talk) 22:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Robertsonza7. Good suggestion. I will try to spread out the links and/or incorporate more. Thank you for taking time to read the article! Nanayaagh (talk) 23:37, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

I added the merge tag because in this edit, Nanayaagh attempted to redirect Aglossa pinguinalis to this article with the edit summary "article with same topic". I'm not an entomologist, so I wouldn't know if it's the same critter. I interpreted it as a possible merge suggestion by that user, as an article cannot be a redirect and contain article content. --Geniac (talk) 00:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Geniac ! I was wondering how to do that. Nanayaagh (talk) 05:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy

The Taxonomy section is pretty short. Maybe you could combine it with another section or add a little more information to it. (talk)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 I added the merge tag because in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aglossa_pinguinalis&diff=279301448&oldid=235103802 this edit], Nanayaagh attempted to redirect [[Aglossa pinguinalis]] to this article with the edit summary "article with same topic". I'm not an entomologist, so I wouldn't know if it's the same critter. I interpreted it as a possible merge suggestion by that user, as an article cannot be a redirect ''and'' contain article content. --[[User:Geniac|Geniac]] ([[User talk:Geniac|talk]]) 00:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 :Thank you Geniac ! I was wondering how to do that. [[User:Nanayaagh|Nanayaagh]] ([[User talk:Nanayaagh|talk]]) 05:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
+==Taxonomy==
+The Taxonomy section is pretty short. Maybe you could combine it with another section or add a little more information to it. ([[User talk: Vekrull|talk]])