User talk:68.173.91.50: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:59, 13 April 2009

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Talk:Hispanic has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)^{What I Do} / _{What I Say} 20:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Hispanic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SamEV (talk) 03:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Talk:Lil Wayne. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Kww(talk) 20:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kww, I Will Post Proof That Lil Wayne Is A Homo Thug - I WILL REPORT YOU IF YOU PERSIST IN DETERING ME

There clearly are references as to lil wayne's alternative lifestyle. There are photos circulating and interviews implying his very persona. I am undetered in posting this info backed by solid sources.

Furthermore, Wiki terms of service DO NOT bar ANYONE from posting any info as long as references are specific and direct. Therefore, such info IS NOT controversial. DO NOT threaten me. I am in the absolute right according to Wiki rules, I am armed with the proper references, and I may report you to Wiki if you attempt to omit this info from the article. This is your last warning. 68.173.91.50 (talk) 01:56, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Castle

Hello and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. As you gave no reason, I wasn't sure why you removed some of the information from the article Castle. I have started a discussion on the talk page which you may wish to contribute to. Cheers. BarretBonden (talk) 11:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BarretBonden, thank you for letting me know!

BarretBonden, you're right. Sorry about that, but in my haste to give as mush info as possible, I forget to give a summary edit. Thank you anyway and I'll keep that in mind! Thanks! Davidx5 (talk) 01:59, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 Hello and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I have noticed that you often edit without an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. As you gave no reason, I wasn't sure why you removed some of the information from the article [[Castle]]. I have started a discussion on the [[Talk:Castle#Recent edits|talk page]] which you may wish to contribute to. Cheers. [[User:BarretBonden|BarretBonden]] ([[User talk:BarretBonden|talk]]) 11:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
+==BarretBonden, thank you for letting me know! ==
+BarretBonden, you're right. Sorry about that, but in my haste to give as mush info as possible, I forget to give a summary edit. Thank you anyway and I'll keep that in mind! Thanks!
+[[User:Davidx5|Davidx5]] ([[User talk:Davidx5|talk]]) 01:59, 13 April 2009 (UTC)