Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Higher education/Assessment: Difference between revisions
→Requesting an assessment or re-assessment: assessment request |
|||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
# [[University of Valle]]. It was initially rated as 'stub', then changed to 'start'. I would like a reasesment since major changes have been made. Thanks. -[[User:Andremun|Andremun]] ([[User talk:Andremun|talk]]) 13:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC) |
# [[University of Valle]]. It was initially rated as 'stub', then changed to 'start'. I would like a reasesment since major changes have been made. Thanks. -[[User:Andremun|Andremun]] ([[User talk:Andremun|talk]]) 13:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
# [[Middle Tennessee State University]]. This was a start class when it was originally assessed, however I have made drastic edits to this article. I think it can be bumped up a class. Thanks. MTSUGoRaidersGo 16:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:MTSUGoRaidersGo|MTSUGoRaidersGo]] ([[User talk:MTSUGoRaidersGo|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MTSUGoRaidersGo|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
# [[Middle Tennessee State University]]. This was a start class when it was originally assessed, however I have made drastic edits to this article. I think it can be bumped up a class. Thanks. MTSUGoRaidersGo 16:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:MTSUGoRaidersGo|MTSUGoRaidersGo]] ([[User talk:MTSUGoRaidersGo|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MTSUGoRaidersGo|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
# [[University of the Sunshine Coast]] Article is rated start-class, I believe the content warrants a higher |
# [[University of the Sunshine Coast]] Article is rated start-class, I believe the content warrants a higher rating. Can someone please take a look... [[User:1Audit1|1Audit1]] ([[User talk:1Audit1|talk]]) 23:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
== List of universities in the Canadian Prairies == |
== List of universities in the Canadian Prairies == |
Revision as of 23:31, 27 April 2009
Based on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Assessment page
I copied the code from that page to act as the base for this assessment page. This needs a lot of work. There are links to project pages that do not exist, and most importantly the assessment process is not fully developed for this project.--Imaginationac 03:49, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Ah, I see. Also, we will need to update the {{WikiProject Universities}} template for assessment functionality. I will try to do this when I have time.(however, I am no template expert) We then may want to add it to the assessment script, User talk:Outriggr/metadatatest.js to assist people in rapid assessment and tagging of articles. Danski14 19:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
FA University Articles
Are there any FA-class university articles? --NThurston 13:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Duke, Cornell, Michigan, Michigan State. I think that's it.--Wizardman 17:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Now Texas A&M :-) Oldag07 03:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Updated Assessment Page
I have updated the assessment page based upon the Pittsburgh assessment page. PadreNuestro 06:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Examples
Could someone updated the examples of different class articles so that they are university articles rather than unrelated articles? Make sure to include the oldid. Thanks! -- Noetic Sage 20:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- Done. I picked some mostly at random; if anyone has objections, feel free to change them to something else. Esrever 21:50, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- So here's a funny thought. The {{grading scheme}} template allows you to expand the class breakdowns to include Template-, List-, NA-, etc., which don't normally show up. However, rather than pointing to, say, Category:Template-Class Universities articles, it points to Category:Template-Class Universities pages. "Okay, no problem," I think to myself, "I'll just bebop over to Template:WikiProject Universities and have it recategorize those articles into the updated links. Unfortunately, despite telling it (I think) to point anything tagged as "Template" or "template" class into Category:Template-Class Universities pages, it still categorizes some in the old category. The thing they all have in common is that they're tagged as "class=template" rather than "class=Template". Is there a way to fix this without having to re-tag every page? Any idea why articles tagged either "class=List" or "class=list" wind up in the List-Class Universities articles category? Esrever 22:26, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- Never mind. Now it's just "class=list" showing up in the wrong places. Esrever 22:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- Double never mind. Everything seems to have sorted itself out now. Esrever 19:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Requesting an assessment or re-assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please request a peer review instead.
- I would like to request for re-assessment of Florida State University from (GA) to (A) article status, alot of work has been done to the page, any sugestions would be helpful. thank you--Nolephin (talk) 20:30, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (currently GA-class, looks like it may meet A-class criteria) Hippo (talk) 16:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- McGill University is a well written article that is following all standards of MOS, and has gone through a large amount of editing. Unfortunately it hasn't gone through I copyedit as the editor I asked is quite busy and so I'll ask another person to do that. However two peer reviews had enough suggestions to revamp the article. It is currently GA and I myself have made a lot of edits, third highest was the last time I checked. Help to improve it further would be wonderful. Thank you, --Sunsetsunrise (talk) 20:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Loyola College in Maryland was initially provided a "start" rating, and honestly deserved its grade. I have spent a great deal of time rewriting this article (with a merge re. the Rugby club tossed in), and I would ask for a review at this point in time. It should merit at least a "B" rating (perhaps higher), and any suggestions to increase the rating would be very much appreciated.Yachtsman1 (talk) 06:16, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Rerated to C-Class. See article's talk page - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 15:25, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. Check in when you have a chance, we will keep improving it. Yachtsman1 (talk) 04:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- One more time (I promise). List of colleges and universities in Maryland is currently unrated. I have edited it to make it better, and would ask for a rating at this time. Thank you.Yachtsman1 (talk) 19:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Rated to List-Class this was a no-brainer :D. A little more work and citations, and it may quality for FL status. I'd like to see it pushed to FL. Good Work. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 20:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review and the compliment. Per your direction, I have added a great deal to this article, including cites, facts, etc. I hope that puts it over the top.Yachtsman1 (talk) 04:59, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Ref: WP:FLC. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 05:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- So nominated. Thanks again for your help, encouragement and suggestions.Yachtsman1 (talk) 08:49, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Ref: WP:FLC. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 05:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review and the compliment. Per your direction, I have added a great deal to this article, including cites, facts, etc. I hope that puts it over the top.Yachtsman1 (talk) 04:59, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- The article about NUST (National Univesity of Sciences and Technology) was initially rated as stub, no doubt about that, but I have done a great deal of work on it to improve its status. Still a long way to go to get even near to FA class, anyways, kindly re-assess the article. Thankyou. Marsa Lahminal (talk) 16:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Reassessed to C-Class. Please refer to the article's talk page. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 17:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Pacific University Health Professions Campus Aboutmovies (talk) 10:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- History of University of Santo Tomas (talk) --Pampi1010 (talk) 06:55, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Assessed to B-Class. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 09:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- WOW! thanks man! I'm totally elated! I'll try to put it up in the GA article! --121.97.240.241 (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Rogers State University. Currently rated as 'start', from when I added the WikiProject Uni template. As a major contributor to the article, I'd like someone else to take a look and give their assessment. Cheers! -steventity (talk)
Reassessed to C. See notes on the talk page for detailed comments. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- University of Valle. It was initially rated as 'stub', then changed to 'start'. I would like a reasesment since major changes have been made. Thanks. -Andremun (talk) 13:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- Middle Tennessee State University. This was a start class when it was originally assessed, however I have made drastic edits to this article. I think it can be bumped up a class. Thanks. MTSUGoRaidersGo 16:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MTSUGoRaidersGo (talk • contribs)
- University of the Sunshine Coast Article is rated start-class, I believe the content warrants a higher rating. Can someone please take a look... 1Audit1 (talk) 23:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
List of universities in the Canadian Prairies
I have nominated List of universities in the Canadian Prairies for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks, where editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.--Kevlar (talk • contribs) 02:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)