<small>If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Members|this list]]. This Newsletter was delivered by</small> <small>[[User:Grk1011|Grk1011/Stephen]] ([[User talk:Grk1011|talk]]) 23:51, 29 April 2009 (UTC)</small>
<small>If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Members|this list]]. This Newsletter was delivered by</small> <small>[[User:Grk1011|Grk1011/Stephen]] ([[User talk:Grk1011|talk]]) 23:51, 29 April 2009 (UTC)</small>
== Support for deleting the Category:Anti-Armenianism ==
Will you support my arguement for the deletion of the Category:Anti-Armenianism that I put forward on May 1, 2009?
It is very subjective and even racist as it puts every person who questions the Armenian genocide, such as prominent academicians, who are not racist or personally against Armenian people or Armenia as an entity, along with assasins and militants.
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.
3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Turkey. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.
October 2008
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
The backlog of assessments in the project is still ongoing, with a large number of articles not being rated. If you see articles without the {{EurovisionNotice}} template on the article's talk page, please add it, or read Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment if you would like to help assess the articles as well.
Instructions for the use of all Eurovision templates and descriptions for the layouts of pages are still in the works.
Remember to source all information you add to pages or else it may be removed and always use an edit summary so other users know why you are adding or removing information.
Eurovision News
Malta announced the names of the songs taking part in its national final.
Hadise will represent Turkey and will have complete control over the selection of her song.
Andorra and Romania announced the format of their national finals.
Bulgaria's Be A Star has gone into full swing with the first monthly selection and its corresponding heats held in October.
The songs of Melodifestivalen 2009 were announced along with the contest's schedule of rounds.
Welcome to the fourth edition of the WikiProject Eurvision newsletter! As the contest gets into full swing, more and more editors will come and edit the project's articles. It is important that we not only make sure that the correct information is added, but try to help the users who added the information if possible. We learn through our mistakes, so leave a reminder on their talk page.
November is unique in that it will have two newsletters going out. This one along with a November supplement that will recap what happened in November. We decided to switch to an end of the month format so say the October Newsletter summarizes what happened in October, which it doesn't in its current first day of the month delivery. By December, the newsletter will come out at the end of every month.
So far I am very happy with how the project is going about four months after its reorganization. We get into arguments here and there, but members' opinions and comments are crucial to the project's existence. They keep us on our toes and help us continue to be a great source of Eurovision history.
Sorry that this issue is a little late, I've been busy ;)
This Newsletter was delivered by Grk1011 (talk). If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list.
WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - December 2008
Note: from now on the Newsletter will be "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar.
IMPORTANT: Please give your opinion here about the inclusion of selection processes in Country in the ESC Year pages.
The backlog of assessments in the project is still ongoing, with a large number of articles not being rated. If you see articles without the {{EurovisionNotice}} template on the article's talk page, please add it, or read Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment if you would like to help assess the articles as well.
Instructions for the use of all Eurovision templates and descriptions for the layouts of pages are still in the works.
Remember to source all information you add to pages or else it may be removed and always use an edit summary so other users know why you are adding or removing information.
Three more songs have qualified for the semi-final of Bulgaria's selection process. Three more heats and another quarter-final will be held during December.
Welcome to the fifth edition of the WikiProject Eurvision newsletter!
Just a couple of short months after starting the newsletter and reorganizing the Eurovision project, things are finally starting to look good and consistent for 2009!
As we move into December, and ever closer to the "heart" of the National Final/Selection season, I would like to remind members to take a look at the project description/guideline on the project page and try to follow it the best way possible as the season progresses. Our main goal here is to have all of the articles consistent, while also being able to nominate them for GA status or above once the 2009 contest is over. The best and easiest way to achieve this is if we all work together and follow the guidelines. I would also like to remind users to source all information added into articles, preferably by reliable/established sources. Any questions regarding sources should be asked on the project talk page. Also, there is a large backlog of 1087 Unassessed Eurovision articles that need to be assessed. Any help with assessment will be appreciated and noted.
If we can manage to work together and follow the guidelines, as well as monitoring unregistered IP addresses, I think the 2009 season will go by much easier than past years! Sure we will still get into our little arguments here and there, and have different opinions about editing, but that's part of the whole editing experience. What fun would there be without the occasional drama? Just remember that at the end of the day, we are all working towards a common goal.
This Newsletter was delivered by Grk1011 (talk). If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list.
Map of South Asia
Hello there,
I was just wondering which source you used for map of Pakistan.There is a disputed territory between India and Pakistan.Part of it is under control of India and Pakistan.Technically speaking this territory does not belong to either of India or Pakistan at the moment until UN conducted referendum.You have shown it part of India and even the part which is administered by Pakistan ,is also shown part of India.A Pakistani can go to those parts but not and Indian,the same is the case with Indian administered Kashmir.When writing a content for Wikipedia,it doesn't has to be biased.Not Indian or even Pakistani View.A disputed Territory is shown separately or highlighted.It shouldn't be shown explicitly belonging to some country.
I hope you will look into this matter.
Regards,
Sohaib
Sohaibgujjar (talk)
AfD
AfD nomination of List of Eurovision Dance Contest presenters
Dear User talk:Turkish Flame, I think there is a misunderstanding between geographical location and Military history. The Gallipoli campaign is covered under Middle Eastern theatre of World War I. This theatre contains all military activities of the Ottoman Empire during World War One. Gallipoli is not part of historically well established European theatre, As you think. Though Geographical location may be misleading, military activities are separated based on the HQ they originate. Gallipoli operations were planned and executed as an extension of the Middle Eastern theatre. This even applies to the Turkish history. All Turkish war efforts are covered under single theatre. It was not divided theatre A, theatre B, as was the case for western war efforts. The Wikipedia uses the Western terminology naming this single theather as Middle Eastern theatre of World War I. --TarikAkin (talk) 16:45, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dear User talk:Turkish Flame, I'm happy that you will be contributing to Military articles that is related to the period. Are you a military historian? What is your background is these articles? Which article you are planning to develop? There are so many missing parts... --TarikAkin (talk) 17:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Middle Eastern theatre doesn't contain all military activities of the Ottoman Empire during WWI as you said. It took part in the European theatre too, with the wars in Gallipoli campaign and others. --Turkish Flame☎18:40, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Would you like to pursue dispute resolution. You have not presented any published source and/or your edit is against the community in Wikipedia. This is a warning your edit, please do not engage to mass changes in Wikipedia. --TarikAkin (talk) 17:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
IMPORTANT: There is currently a proposal to change the design of some of our projects navigational templates. Please weigh in here. This project wide change needs as many opinions as possible to determine consensus.
Always use an edit summary even when the edit is minor so that other users know why you are adding or removing information; we can't read minds.
With Afkatk's recent tagging spree, there are now over 2,500 articles associated with the project. If you see Eurovision related articles without the {{EurovisionNotice}} template on the article's talk page, please add it. You can also read Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment if you would like to help assess articles as well.
Eurovision News
Do you have news for the next issue? Submit it here!
Welcome to the ninth edition of the WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter!
We're less than a month away from the Eurovision Song Contest 2009 and now is the time to make sure that all articles are the best that they can be. This is our busiest time and thousands of people will come to Wikipedia and will see our work. We need to show them that Wikipedia is a place to come for facts and a site that they can rely on.
I can't emphasize enough how important it is for members to take part in discussions on talk pages. We have 65 members and usually less than five people step up and comment. Editing Wikipedia means is being part of a community. Take pride in what you do here and make your positions known!
I hope to see you all editing like a storm next month, and don't forget to submit news for the next newsletter here.
Support for deleting the Category:Anti-Armenianism
Will you support my arguement for the deletion of the Category:Anti-Armenianism that I put forward on May 1, 2009?
It is very subjective and even racist as it puts every person who questions the Armenian genocide, such as prominent academicians, who are not racist or personally against Armenian people or Armenia as an entity, along with assasins and militants.
Turkish Flame 
