Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable Enzo Ferrari owners: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:51, 3 May 2009

List of notable Enzo Ferrari owners

My reason is: Pointless piece of trivia which is no relevance to an encyclopedia site

Not to mention that also none of these are sourced, as the fact is how do you know these people really own them or have they borrowed the car. Thirdly, wasn't there a list that got deleted sometimes ago and lastly, how many of these people (those without its own article) is eligible for its own article. Donnie Park (talk) 21:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Clearly not a defining criterion of any of these people, and nearly impossible to verify. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 21:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just cruft. Some of the "owners" like the Pope are important to the history of the Enzo, but that should be covered in the main Enzo article— Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel J. Leivick (talk • contribs)

Delete Tried to work on it, but in the end it is pure listcruft ukexpat (talk) 21:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE (which really should have a listing for "trivia"). DreamGuy (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete as per the nomination - Wikipedia is not a place for unencyclopedic lists of junk and none of it has any reliable sources. It fails Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, Wikipedia:Reliable sources and this list is also is in the lines of listcruft. Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 22:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per everyone. Isn't it Snowing yet? Edward321 (talk) 00:41, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 02:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 21:46, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete', the question of who owns a limited-edition, luxury brand of car is not relevant to the notability of that brand. And reliable sources documenting notable people who own them are impossible to find unless you actually try (then it's a piece of cake). Wuzziest (talk) 08:51, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Lists|list of Lists-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- —<b style="border:1px solid #C5BE83;background-color:#F5DEB3;font-size:0.9em;">&nbsp;[[User:LinguistAtLarge|LinguistAtLarge]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User talk:LinguistAtLarge|Talk]]&nbsp;</b> 02:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC)</small>
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Transportation|list of Transportation-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 21:46, 2 May 2009 (UTC)</small>
+*''Delete''', the question of who owns a limited-edition, luxury brand of car is not relevant to the notability of that brand. And reliable sources documenting notable people who own them are impossible to find unless you actually try (then it's a piece of cake). [[User:Wuzziest|Wuzziest]] ([[User talk:Wuzziest|talk]]) 08:51, 3 May 2009 (UTC)