Jump to content

Talk:Four Books and Five Classics: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sungrad (talk | contribs)
I Agree: new section
Line 5: Line 5:
Yes, I believe that the Four Books articleshould be merged with the Five Classics article. After all, they are a set of related Chinese classics.
Yes, I believe that the Four Books articleshould be merged with the Five Classics article. After all, they are a set of related Chinese classics.
[[User:Sungrad|Sungrad]] ([[User talk:Sungrad|talk]]) 23:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
[[User:Sungrad|Sungrad]] ([[User talk:Sungrad|talk]]) 23:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

I agree with Sungrad. Such a merger would simplify things.

Revision as of 08:48, 5 May 2009

WikiProject iconChina Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I Agree

Yes, I believe that the Four Books articleshould be merged with the Five Classics article. After all, they are a set of related Chinese classics. Sungrad (talk) 23:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Sungrad. Such a merger would simplify things.