Talk:Four Books and Five Classics: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→I Agree: new section |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Yes, I believe that the Four Books articleshould be merged with the Five Classics article. After all, they are a set of related Chinese classics. |
Yes, I believe that the Four Books articleshould be merged with the Five Classics article. After all, they are a set of related Chinese classics. |
||
[[User:Sungrad|Sungrad]] ([[User talk:Sungrad|talk]]) 23:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC) |
[[User:Sungrad|Sungrad]] ([[User talk:Sungrad|talk]]) 23:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
I agree with Sungrad. Such a merger would simplify things. |
Revision as of 08:48, 5 May 2009
China Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
I Agree
Yes, I believe that the Four Books articleshould be merged with the Five Classics article. After all, they are a set of related Chinese classics. Sungrad (talk) 23:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
I agree with Sungrad. Such a merger would simplify things.