Talk:Stacey Q

IMDB said she was born November 30th, 1958 (anonymous)

TV Appearances

I am 99% sure she also appeared on an episode of Full House. Since her appearances on The Facts of Life are mentioned, perhaps this should be too - unless there is some additional importance to her Facts of Life appearances. MachThree (talk) 18:37, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Neutrality and Facts

This article needs a ton of work! I was a Stacey Q fan back in the day, and she essentially had one and a half hits on the U.S. pop chart. This article makes it sound like she was The Second Coming. Can someone with SOLID information rewrite this piece of garbage? The article is clearly filled with made-up "information". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.142.232.104 (talk) 19:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Album release dates

Im finding like two different release dates for each album, which really messes up the entire discography. Im getting one from AMG, and one from discogs.com. Can anyone set me straight on this?

Bearingbreaker92 20:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Singles

Um, Stacey Q did not have four #1 singles on the sales chart. She had one at most! Can someone please plug in the real numbers to the Singles portion of this entry? It's ridiculous. Revisionist history stinks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.142.232.104 (talk) 19:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Weird Al

I couldn't find anything about Weird Al and "Two Pop Tarts"?

Confused

I am getting mixed information the chart performance of stacey q's albums on the billboard hot 200. Some websites say that the "better than heaven album" hit 101,102, or 59. The same thing goes for hard machine is etheir 115, 108 or 102. And for nights like this I cannot find any idea.Angel,Isaac 10:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Staceyqboomerang.jpg

Image:Staceyqboomerang.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Staceyqheaven.jpg

Image:Staceyqheaven.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

This article is horrible

This article is horrible and reads like a fan page and is way too long. I am removing the following that was written under her time on Facts of Life- "George Burnett and Cinnamon were never heard from again, though some fans still hope to one day find out what happened to the fictional couple.[2]" This does not sound encyclopedic. This whole article makes it sound like she was as popular as Tiffany or Debbie Gibson. She only had like 1 top 10 hit.--68.19.210.175 (talk) 02:10, 17 May 2009 (UTC)--68.19.210.175 (talk) 02:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)