Jump to content

User talk:Matthead: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 71.99.102.134 to last revision by Matthead (HG)
don't remove someone elses messages. Let Matthead remove it if he wants.
Line 58: Line 58:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Walhalla_temple&curid=1013907&diff=295253800&oldid=294721356]. But in that case you probably should ref every single person listed per that guide because I don't see any refs for them. And I'm tempted to dig an alternative ref for Copernicus and put in "Economist" in there.[[User:Radeksz|radek]] ([[User talk:Radeksz|talk]]) 21:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Walhalla_temple&curid=1013907&diff=295253800&oldid=294721356]. But in that case you probably should ref every single person listed per that guide because I don't see any refs for them. And I'm tempted to dig an alternative ref for Copernicus and put in "Economist" in there.[[User:Radeksz|radek]] ([[User talk:Radeksz|talk]]) 21:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
: The [[Walhalla temple]] article is about the Walhalla and its (resp. King Ludwig's) way of selecting and presenting the busts and biographies. And no, I'm not going to copy the whole guide to the article. --&nbsp;[[User:Matthead|Matthead]]&nbsp;[[User_talk:Matthead|<font style="color:#ffff00;background:#0000cc;"><small>&nbsp;Discuß&nbsp;</small></font>]]&nbsp; 22:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
: The [[Walhalla temple]] article is about the Walhalla and its (resp. King Ludwig's) way of selecting and presenting the busts and biographies. And no, I'm not going to copy the whole guide to the article. --&nbsp;[[User:Matthead|Matthead]]&nbsp;[[User_talk:Matthead|<font style="color:#ffff00;background:#0000cc;"><small>&nbsp;Discuß&nbsp;</small></font>]]&nbsp; 22:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

== historic names? ==

are you serious?
we are not german reich anymore!!!
get it throu your thick german head.
I don't care how you germans called our cities.
use that names in you german wiki.
no one else cares about that, but you, nationalist shovinist pig!

We are CZECH REPUBLIC. SPEAKING CZECH!
get it right!

[[Special:Contributions/71.99.102.134|71.99.102.134]] ([[User talk:71.99.102.134|talk]]) 05:06, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:57, 23 June 2009

Did you know & Signpost

Adam and Eve by Ludwig Krug
Adam and Eve by Ludwig Krug


AFD voided discussion notification

— Preceding unsigned comment added by JerryBot (talkcontribs) 17:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFDs

Copernicus

As you presumably know Copernicus was Polish astronomer born in Royal Prussia, part of Crown of the Polish Kingdom, so its not true calling him Prussian astronomer. In Walhalla are busts of many Germanic people who werent even Germanic, and werent born in Germanic states (Michael Andreas Barclay de TollyRussian Field Marshal had Scottish so Celtic descent, Joseph Radetzky von Radetz had Czech descent, etc. Mathiasrex (talk) 21:52, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Walhalla enshrinees

Your description of this category is misleading. Polish national hero General Jan Henryk Dąbrowski was Saxon (sächsisch) officer and he spoke better in German than in Polish ... Mathiasrex (talk) 22:28, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you really insist

[1]. But in that case you probably should ref every single person listed per that guide because I don't see any refs for them. And I'm tempted to dig an alternative ref for Copernicus and put in "Economist" in there.radek (talk) 21:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Walhalla temple article is about the Walhalla and its (resp. King Ludwig's) way of selecting and presenting the busts and biographies. And no, I'm not going to copy the whole guide to the article. -- Matthead  Discuß   22:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

historic names?

are you serious? we are not german reich anymore!!! get it throu your thick german head. I don't care how you germans called our cities. use that names in you german wiki. no one else cares about that, but you, nationalist shovinist pig!

We are CZECH REPUBLIC. SPEAKING CZECH! get it right!

71.99.102.134 (talk) 05:06, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]