Talk:Arcee

Was the reason that a toy was never produced originally due to the fact that her transformation was essentially impossible (I'm not an expert, but it seems, from the look of her, that her robot form is totally the wrong shape to become the car) to implement? (Darien Shields 21:14, 14 October 2005 (UTC))

Bottom line from the 1980's: Girls don't play with "Action" figures and boys don't play with dolls.

Um, what about Scarlett or Lady Jaye from GI Joe? Your arguement lacks the fact that Arcee is a female action figure and those were ok. Well, to me anyway. Don^MEGĂ|60645 16:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

• It's not his argument, it was Hasbros, take it up with them. As for me I agree, they should have made an Arcee toy --The Matrix Prime 04:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Contested parts

• "Only Human". This isn't critically important to the character, and the image is unnecessary.
• A.R.C. This isn't notable. Fans make up toys all the time.
• Please use {{-}} instead of <BR CLEAR="ALL">. Interrobamf 16:29, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

• I think only human is important to Arcee because it's one episode where she was highlighted, and the only other form she possessed. It's worth one sentence and a picture.
• Instead of a picture and a sentence, I just add the link to the A.R.C. page in the references? It is an actual COMPANY and you can purchase the toy, even if it's an unauthorized third party toy.
• I can use the {{-}}, thanks for the suggestion.user:mathewignash

Fair use rationale for Image:Autobot logo s.jpg

Image:Autobot logo s.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Energon023-cover.jpg

Image:Energon023-cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:20, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

So does she survive in the film or not?

In the film at least two of the motorcycles get blasted, but its not confirmed if they get killed/destroyed, a motocycles is seen at theend, but not confirmed if its Arcee, and its not really discussed in the movie as to whether they are one being or three seperate ones, I think they are merely referred to as the Arcee twins, but Bay claims her kills her off in the film, so its not really clear as to whether any of the Arcees survives.

We are having a very similar conversation on the Revenge of the Fallen main Wikipedia page. I don't know if you're in on that conversation, but you may want to jump in on over there. I think the general consensus is that only two of the three motorcycles were damaged/killed, but because in the movie Arcee is made up of all three motorcycles (unlike the toyline), the one motorcycle that is not seen being damaged or killed guarantees that Arcee survives the movie. She just lost two out of the three bodies that she was using. Bay claimed to have killed her, and there was previous question as to whether he was serious or if it was part of his misinformation campaign. The way I'd argue it, Bay told a partial lie, as Arcee provided several bodies which Bay could use for Autobot casualties, but he doesn't destroy all of them, so Arcee still lives. PegasusHoplite28 (talk) 17:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)