Jump to content

User talk:203.94.135.134: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 299470434 by 203.94.135.134 (talk)
+ Archive Note
Line 1: Line 1:
'''DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.'''
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:203.94.135.134&oldid=133994171 Archive 1] (April 2006 to May 2007)

This archive page covers approximately from April 2006 to May 2007.

Post replies to the [[User talk:203.94.135.134|main talk page]], copying or summarising the section you are replying to if necessary.
----


==AFL Club logos==
==AFL Club logos==

Revision as of 08:15, 30 June 2009

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

This archive page covers approximately from April 2006 to May 2007.

Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarising the section you are replying to if necessary.


AFL Club logos

would you stop increasing the size of the logos, there is no need for them to be so huge, it takes up 1/3 of the page and bloats the info-box, thanks --Dan027 08:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFL Club logos 2

Hey buddy, please stop increasing the size of the logos - u seem to be doing it to all the AFL logos, not just Collingwood, please stop otherwise it will soon become locked and therefore prevent you from editing unless you register. If you keep doing it when you are registered then you will be BANNED!!! - Careful mate!!!


Reply to message

Hey buddy, I apologise for the threat, it just really irritates me that you keep changing the size of my beloved Magpies logo. The image is too large, it doesn't need to be too large, if you look at other sports logos, for example Newcastle United, South Sydney Rabbitohs, etc - they are all 150px. That's the right size not too small or too large. It's perfect - just leave it please, if you want, change the other AFL logos but please leave Collingwood. Otherwise we will keep changing the size every two seconds if that's what you want cause i'm here for the long ride BABY!!!!. LOL LOL. Cheers Steves101 - Enjoy Wikipedia!! Steves101 23:44, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IPA and Australian English

Hi. I have raised the issue of IPA and Australian English for place names at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#IPA and Australian English. Your thoughts may be of assistance. -- Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 00:20, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In a recent edit, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Thank you. Q T C 02:52, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cairns, Queensland

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cairns, Queensland. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Bidgee (talk) 02:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]