User talk:Andrewrp: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:32, 1 July 2009

Archives

My Beginnings Resolved Issues

Hi! I'm Andrew, and I like photography and computers. I am also interested in music. I play the violin and piano.

A Clean Slate

Please see my archive for archived conversations. Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 20:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned

This edit is not exactly in the spirit of WP:BITE. This user isn't a vandal; he's just someone who didn't understand the rules and got angry when he didn't understand your warning. He's likely to be a potential useful editor once he learns his way around. Why not be nice to him? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree I could of have been nicer. I can get angry sometimes. Also, this comment will NOT be archived, until I archive all again. Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 18:35, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've archived things I just didn't want to look at, too. :) -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I still won't Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 18:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously

Stop reverting that guy. Now. I'm not going to block you for 3RR, but those edits are NOT obvious vandalism. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you have abused your rollback privileges, edit warring on Electronic prescribing. You no longer have them. Toddst1 (talk) 16:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Toddst1 blocked the other user, and removed your rollback instead of blocking you. I probably would have done neither, but I have always disliked giving out 3RR blocks and whatnot. The only thing I can really tell you is DO NOT revert the fourth time unless there can be NO possible doubt that the edit in question is vandalism. There was a lot of possible doubt in this case. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:12, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

EW using rollback is exceptionally uncool. Be glad you're not blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 16:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not easily. You could probably post to WP:AN, but you should know that if you had not had rollback, you would unquestionably be blocked now. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Judging from the revision history of electronic prescribing[1] User:Just James should have consequences similar to those suffered by andrewrp and User:Qelknap- he reverted 14 times just today.·Maunus·ƛ· 16:22, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let's be clear about this: Qelknap was editing Wikipedia in a disruptive manner (200+ edits) prior to what you're labelling as an edit war.--Just James ^T/C 16:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 :::::Not easily. You could probably post to [[WP:AN]], but you should know that if you had not had rollback, you would unquestionably be blocked now. [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="green">J'''.'''delanoy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<font color="blue"><sub>adds</sub></font>]] 16:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 Judging from the revision history of electronic prescribing[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_prescribing&action=history] [[User:Just James]] should have consequences similar to those suffered by andrewrp and [[User:Qelknap]]- he reverted 14 times just today.[[User:Maunus|·Maunus·<span class="Unicode">ƛ</span>·]] 16:22, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
+:Let's be clear about this: [[User:Qelknap|Qelknap]] was editing Wikipedia in a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parliament&diff=299707234&oldid= disruptive manner] (200+ edits) prior to what you're labelling as an [[WP:edit war|edit war]].--[[User:Just James|<b><font color="green">Just James</font></b>]] [[User_Talk:Just James|<font color="#0047AB"><sup><small>'''T'''</small></sup></font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Just James|<font color="#0047AB"><small>'''C'''</small></font>]] 16:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)