Jump to content

User:Feltcap: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Feltcap (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Feltcap (talk | contribs)
Line 16: Line 16:
*[[Cool Cities Initiative]]
*[[Cool Cities Initiative]]
*[[Clarkmobile_(automobile_company)|Clarkmobile]]
*[[Clarkmobile_(automobile_company)|Clarkmobile]]
*[[Frandor_Mall|Frandor Mall]]
{{totd-random}}
{{totd-random}}



Revision as of 13:33, 8 July 2009


  • Optimism should have a separate page that focuses on the philosophical idea of optimism and distinguishes the philosophical view from "positive thinking" and other everyday uses of the word.
  • Philosophy of social science, has some okay points but requires elaboration on Wittgenstein and Winch, perhaps other linguistic critiques, whether logical positivist or postmodernist.
  • Exchange value needs to be redone, it shouldn't be under 'Marxist theory'- although it's an important component of Marxist theory it's also vital for all economics. That said the article's weight on Marx is also absurd.
  • German Idealism and the articles related to it may need to be rewritten or expanded to avoid undue weight on Arthur Schopenhauer.
  • Protected values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
  • Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
  • Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
  • Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
  • Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
  • Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
  • Analytic philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
  • Lifeworld A philosophical concept that seems to have fallen exclusively into the hands of the sociologists. Could use some attention; it's a major and complex issue in phenomenology.
  • Perception Needs the attention of philosophically minded Wikipedians. This is only the start of an overhaul of perception and related articles.

User page: This is a Wikipedia user page, not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Feltcap.

I am a noob, please dont bite!

Articles feltcap thinks need attention

  • Harrison Gray Dyar is a newer article about the supposed inventor of the telegraph, this obviously needs to be linked to and noted on the Telegraph page which it is currently not.

Articles feltcap started

Tip of the moment...
How to catch admin attention fast

Have you run across a problem that requires the attention of an Administrator?

The fastest way to catch the attention of administrators in general is to post an alert to the Administrators' noticeboard (A.N.). Administrators go there all the time to see what is up with Wikipedia; one of them will see your message and will take immediate appropriate action. Experienced editors hang out there too and sometimes will answer a question before an Admin gets to it.

Another option is to paste a {{admin help}} template (with the four curly braces) along with your question on to your Talk page and an Admin will stop by shortly.

To add this auto-randomizing template to your user page, use {{totd-random}}

Caught you


(Refresh)
        Instead of doing something useful,
you have been staring at this page since 12:17 Thursday, August 22, 2024 UTC.