Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor crowl: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
del
Line 9: Line 9:
*'''Comment'''... yep, the article is lacking sourcing. But they seem to be available... at least for some of the assertions [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2006&as_user_hdate=2009&q=%22Victor+Crowl%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&q=%22Victor+Crowl%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go]. However, it all seems thin. I'll withold further comment and see if the author cleans up his 2-day-old article. He not know about sandboxes? [[User:MichaelQSchmidt|MichaelQSchmidt]] ([[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|talk]]) 07:00, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''... yep, the article is lacking sourcing. But they seem to be available... at least for some of the assertions [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2006&as_user_hdate=2009&q=%22Victor+Crowl%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&q=%22Victor+Crowl%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go]. However, it all seems thin. I'll withold further comment and see if the author cleans up his 2-day-old article. He not know about sandboxes? [[User:MichaelQSchmidt|MichaelQSchmidt]] ([[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|talk]]) 07:00, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - I did find [http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/canada/toronto-un-human-rights-decleration-8198.html this] which is an Irish newspaper. But I am unable to find any additional coverage of significance that would establish notability -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 13:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - I did find [http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/canada/toronto-un-human-rights-decleration-8198.html this] which is an Irish newspaper. But I am unable to find any additional coverage of significance that would establish notability -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 13:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
:::'''I woudl put him in a sand box!!''' deleate this man and all bits hide un the sand [[User:Hasmme Vogel|Hasmme Vogel]] ([[User talk:Hasmme Vogel|talk]]) 14:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:01, 17 July 2009

Victor crowl

Victor crowl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Contested prod. No evidence of notability. Or anything else. Google hits seem to be only on social networking sites - nothing substantive. Fails WP:N, WP:VER andy (talk) 10:07, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I woudl put him in a sand box!! deleate this man and all bits hide un the sand Hasmme Vogel (talk) 14:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]