Jump to content

User talk:201.198.133.51: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=201.198.133.51&blocks=true&lang=en
Line 45: Line 45:
== Cross wiki vandal ==
== Cross wiki vandal ==
Please see [http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=201.198.133.51&blocks=true&lang=en]. <font color="#0000FF">Antique</font> <font color="#FF007F">Rose</font> &mdash; <font color="red">[[User talk:Antique Rose|Drop me a line]]</font> 19:22, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Please see [http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=201.198.133.51&blocks=true&lang=en]. <font color="#0000FF">Antique</font> <font color="#FF007F">Rose</font> &mdash; <font color="red">[[User talk:Antique Rose|Drop me a line]]</font> 19:22, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
:Might be a proxy... [[Special:Contributions/83.108.193.157|83.108.193.157]] ([[User talk:83.108.193.157|talk]]) 20:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:45, 21 July 2009

Costa Rica

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (201.198.133.51) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 16:53, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to New Afghan Army has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 15:44, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ijaz Shah has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 20:43, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Ijaz Shah constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.Mundo (talk) 20:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Operation Snakebite, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Operation Snakebite was changed by 201.198.133.51 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-02-12T18:49:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Star Wars: The Power of the Force. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --EEMIV (talk) 16:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Romanian troops in Iraq

Please, read this. The Romanian troops have left Iraq. Antique RoseDrop me a line 14:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Multinational Force - Iraq. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. I understand that there are reliable sources on both sides of the issue. I am not making a decision on this, but I'm quite sure that this is an edit war over the reliability of sources, and not blatant vandalism. Therefore, WP:EW applies. I suggest you pursue dispute resolution, starting with a discussion on the article talk page. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 19:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Multinational Force - Iraq. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Antique RoseDrop me a line 19:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cross wiki vandal

Please see [1]. Antique RoseDrop me a line 19:22, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Might be a proxy... 83.108.193.157 (talk) 20:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]