Jump to content

Shaken baby syndrome: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Bots
5,075,533 edits
m Citation maintenance. [U]Added: format, issn. Formatted: pages, doi, volume, author, title, year, journal, issue, month. You can use this bot yourself! Please report any bugs.
Line 142: Line 142:
* [[Alan Yurko]] - sentenced to life in prison + 10 years (1998) without parole for the murder of his son, due to shaken baby syndrome. Later released after appeal.
* [[Alan Yurko]] - sentenced to life in prison + 10 years (1998) without parole for the murder of his son, due to shaken baby syndrome. Later released after appeal.
* [[C. Alan B. Clemetson]]
* [[C. Alan B. Clemetson]]
* [[RPM Power Rangers #Scott Truman|Scott Truman]] A fictional character that was careless with a baby when trying to protect it from enemy soldiers.


==Footnotes==
==Footnotes==

Revision as of 22:03, 6 September 2009

Shaken baby syndrome

Shaken baby syndrome (SBS) or Battered Baby Syndrome is a form of child abuse that occurs when an abuser violently shakes an infant or small child, creating a whiplash-type motion that causes acceleration-deceleration injuries. The injury is estimated to affect between 1,200 and 1,600 children every year in the USA.[1] It is common for there to be no external evidence of trauma.[2]

The concept of SBS was initially described by Dr. John Caffey, a radiologist.[3][4]

SBS is often fatal and can cause severe brain damage, resulting in lifelong disability. Estimated death rates (mortality) among infants with SBS range from 15 to 38%; the median is 20–25%.[2] Up to half of deaths related to child abuse are reportedly due to shaken baby syndrome.[5] Nonfatal consequences of SBS include varying degrees of visual impairment (including blindness), motor impairment (e.g. cerebral palsy) and cognitive impairments. [citation needed]

Signs and symptoms

Subdural hematoma (arrow), bleeding between the dura mater and the brain, commonly occurs in SBS.

SBS is accompanied by a variety of signs, which range from mild to severe and nonspecific to obviously head trauma related.[2] There is no single symptom that defines SBS.[6] The characteristic injuries associated with SBS include retinal hemorrhages, multiple fractures of the long bones, and subdural hematomas (bleeding in the brain).[7] These signs have evolved through the years as the accepted and recognized signs of child abuse and the shaken baby syndrome. Medical professionals strongly suspect shaking as the cause of injuries when a baby or small child presents with retinal hemorrhage, fractures, soft tissue injuries or subdural hematoma, that cannot be explained by accidental trauma or other medical conditions. About three quarters of cases involve retinal hemorrhaging.[6] Additional effects of SBS are diffuse axonal injury, oxygen deprivation and swelling of the brain,[6] which can raise intracranial pressure and damage delicate brain tissue.

Victims of SBS may display irritability, failure to thrive, alterations in eating patterns, lethargy, vomiting, seizures, bulging or tense fontanels (the soft spots on an infant's head), increased size of the head, altered breathing, and dilated pupils.[8]

Fractures of the vertebrae, long bones, and ribs may also be associated with SBS. [9][10][11] Dr. John Caffey reported in 1972 that metaphyseal avulsions (small fragments of bone had been torn off where the periosteum covering the bone and the cortical bone are tightly bound together) and "bones on both the proximal and distal sides of a single joint are effected, especially at the knee". [12][13]

Anatomy and pathophysiology

Children under the age of three years are especially susceptible to brain damage from shaking.[14] This is due to several anatomical factors. Their heads are bigger and weigh more with respect to their bodies than adults' heads, and their neck muscles are weak and cannot prevent violent motions.[15] Infants' brains are not fully myelinated; myelin sheaths form in childhood and are complete in adolescence. The water content of the brain is reduced as neurons gain myelin during development, so babies have a greater percentage of brain water than adults do.[16] Because of this higher water content, children's brains are softer and are much more susceptible to acceleration-deceleration injuries and diffuse axonal injury.[16]

The underlying injury in SBS is typically diffuse axonal injury.[17]

In 2004, a Scottish database collected data for five years on cases of suspected non-accidental head injury diagnosed after a multiagency assessment and included cases with uncoerced confessions of perpetrators and criminal convictions. Several patterns appeared allowing the categorization of the cases into four predominant types: Hyperacute encephalopathy (6% of all cases); Acute encephalopathy (53% of cases (SBS)); Subacute non-encephalopathic presentation (19% of cases); Chronic extracerebral presentation (22% of cases). Infants can be traumatically injured in many ways, and many instances are unwitnessed. Thus the generic term non-accidental head injury or inflicted traumatic brain injury is occasionally used in preference to shaken baby syndrome, which implies a specific mechanism of injury.[18] An earlier detailed neuropathological study was published in the UK in 2001, which included immunocytochemistry for microscopic damage.[19]

Mechanism

SBS results from rotational acceleration of the head.[2] Rotational injury is especially damaging and likely to occur in shaking trauma.[20] The type of injuries caused by shaking injury are usually not caused by falls and impacts from normal play, which are mostly linear forces.[20] The type of shaking that is necessary to cause SBS is very violent and would be clearly recognizable to an observer as dangerous and potentially deadly.[2]

Prevention

Prevention is similar to the prevention of child abuse in general. New parents, babysitters, and other caregivers can be warned about the dangers of shaking infants. A child's crying and irritation are common triggers for the frustration that can lead to violence in the caregiver.[2] Some experts offer caregivers strategies to cope with their own frustrations; for example, they may be reminded that they are not always responsible when babies cry.

Diagnosis

Hydrocephalus, an accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid, can accompany SBS.[6] CT scanning is one technique used to diagnose the condition.

SBS may be misdiagnosed and underdiagnosed, and caregivers may lie or be unaware of the mechanism of injury.[2] Commonly, there are no externally visible signs of the condition,[2] and there is no established set of symptoms that indicate it.[6] Examination by an experienced ophthalmologist is often critical in diagnosing shaken baby syndrome, as particular forms of ocular bleeding are quite characteristic.[21] No alternative condition mimics all of the symptoms of SBS exactly, but those that must be ruled out include hydrocephalus, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), seizure disorders, and infectious or congenital diseases like meningitis and metabolic disorders.[20] CT scanning and magnetic resonance imaging are used to diagnose the condition.[2] Conditions that may accompany SBS include bone fractures, injury to the cervical spine (in the neck), hemorrhaging of the retina (in the eye), cerebral hemorrhage or atrophy, hydrocephalus, and papilledema (swelling of the optic disc).[6]

Treatment

Treatment involves monitoring of intracranial pressure (the pressure within the skull), draining of fluid from the cerebral ventricles, and, if an intracranial hematoma is present, draining of the hematoma.[6]

Prognosis

Prognosis depends on severity and can range from total recovery to severe disability to death when the injury is severe.[6] SBS kills about one third of its victims and permanently and severely disables another third.[20] Problems resulting from SBS include learning disabilities, seizure disorders, speech disability, hydrocephalus, behavioral problems, cerebral palsy, and visual disorders.[20]

Epidemiology

Small children are at particularly high risk for the abuse that causes SBS given the large difference in size between the small child and an adult.[2] SBS usually occurs in children under the age of two but may occur in those up to age five.[2] In 2001, 903,000 children suffered from SBS and an additional 1,300 died from it.[6]

Risk factors

Caregivers that are at risk for becoming abusive often have unrealistic expectations of the child and may display "role reversal", expecting the child to fulfill the needs of the caregiver.[2] Substance abuse and emotional stress, resulting for example from financial troubles, are other risk factors for aggression and impulsiveness in caregivers.[2] Both males and females can inflict SBS, but the abusers are more often male.[2] Although it had been previously speculated that SBS was an isolated event, a history of prior child abuse is a common finding in cases of SBS.[2] In an estimated 33–40% of cases, evidence of prior head injuries, such as old intracranial bleeds, is present.[2]

History

In 1946, the concept of SBS and the term "whiplash shaken baby syndrome" was introduced by Dr. John Caffey, a pediatric radiologist.[6] The term described a set of symptoms found with little or no external evidence of head trauma, including retinal hemorrhages and intracranial hemorrhages with subdural or subarachnoid bleeding or both.[2] In 1971, Guthkelch proposed that whiplash injury caused subdural hemorrhage in infants by tearing the veins in the subdural space.[2] Development of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the 1970s and 1980s advanced the ability to diagnose the syndrome.[2]

In April 2006, a Daubert hearing (a mini-trial within a trial, conducted before the judge only, not the jury, over the validity and admissibility of expert opinion testimony) was conducted concerning the admissibility of proposed medical and scientific evidence in a Kentucky Circuit Court case.[22] A Grand Jury had indicted the defendant of first-degree criminal abuse by violently shaking a child. The Defendant alleges that the child's medical records indicate that the only significant injury for the victim was a subdural hematoma and retinal hemorrhaging and there was no significant bruising, fractures, or evidence of impact. The Commonwealth's case was based upon the theory of shaken baby syndrome. The Court concluded that "the clinical medical and scientific research communities are in disagreement as to whether it is possible to determine if a given head injury is due to an accident or abuse." The trial court's ruling is not considered binding legal precedent. The Commonwealth of Kentucky has appealed the ruling to the state's intermediate appellate court.[23]

In July 2005, the Court of Appeals in the United Kingdom heard four appeals of SBS convictions: one case was dropped, the sentence was reduced for one, and two convictions were upheld.[24] The court found that the classic triad of retinal hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, and acute encephalopathy are not 100% diagnostic of SBS and that clinical history is also important. In the Court's ruling, they upheld the clinical concept of SBS but dismissed one case and reduced another from murder to manslaughter.[24] In their words: "Whilst a strong pointer to NAHI [non-accidental head injury] on its own we do not think it possible to find that it must automatically and necessarily lead to a diagnosis of NAHI. All the circumstances, including the clinical picture, must be taken into account." .[25]

The court invalidated a "unified hypothesis" proposed by Geddes and colleagues as an alternative mechamism for the subdural and retinal hemorrhage found in suspected cases of SBS.[24] The unified hypothesis proposed that the hemorrhage was not caused by shearing of subdural and retinal veins but rather by cerebral hypoxia, increased intracranial pressure, and increased pressure in the brain's blood vessels.[24] The court reported that "the unified hypothesis [could] no longer be regarded as a credible or alternative cause of the triad of injuries": subdural haemorrhage, retinal bleeding and encephalopathy due to hypoxemia (low blood oxygen) found in suspected SBS.[24]

The term non-accidental trauma has been suggested instead of "SBS".[18]

Controversies and alternative hypotheses

The exact nature of the injuries caused by SBS is controversial.[6]

Mechanistic controversy

Apparently a critical point was missed or overlooked in a paper published in 1968 [26] concerning the results of bioengineering study in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Transportation. This experiment showed, qualitatively, that rotation alone could indeed produce intracranial injury, though it was not shown quantitatively that human beings could generate the required rotational acceleration by manual shaking. This critical omission was not addressed until 19 years later, when it was shown quantitatively that impact was required to generate adequate force. Guthkelch, Caffey, and others either were not aware of, or disregarded, this critical missing piece of information. In the intervening years, and even up to the present, numerous references are made to infants sustaining inflicted brain injury by manual shaking. Yet no laboratory proof of this possibility has ever been put forth. In fact, the available experimental evidence began as far back as 1943, addressed directly in 1987 [27] and reproduced in 2003, [28] seems to indicate the contrary. [29][30][22]

The assessment of the mechanical causation of injury requires training and experience in Injury Biomechanics, a distinct discipline not taught in medical school. Lack of education and experience in Injury Biomechanics, amongst other factors, has led in practice to the proliferation and propagation of inaccurate and sometimes erroneous information on SBS injury mechanisms in the literature." A recent biomechanical experiment in 2005, demonstrated that "forceful shaking can severely injure or kill an infant, this is because the cervical spine would be severely injured and not because subdural hematomas would be caused by high head rotational accelerations. Furthermore, shaking cervical spine injury can occur at much lower levels of head velocity and acceleration than those reported for the SBS. These findings are consistent with the physical laws of injury biomechanics as well as our collective understanding of the fragile infant cervical spine from (1) clinical obstetric experience, (2) automotive medicine and crash safety experience, and (3) common parental experience. We have determined that an infant head subjected to the levels of rotational velocity and acceleration called for in the SBS literature, would experience forces on the infant neck far exceeding the limits for structural failure of the cervical spine. Furthermore, shaking cervical spine injury can occur at much lower levels of head velocity and acceleration than those reported for the SBS.[31]

The following is part of a letter to the editors in 2006, reponding to criticism of the reported velocity values as being too high, in the previously mentioned biomechanical experiment in 2005. Since SBS is referred to in the literature as causing "acceleration/deceleration" brain injury, my approach was to directly analyze these accelerations applied for the time course of shaking. I chose a range that includes the highest values of accelerations reported because had I chosen lower values, the analysis would simply exclude the cornerstone mechanism of SBS and therefore, would be rendered moot. In other words, lower values would not be sufficient to activate the customary mechanism of rupturing bridging veins that SBS solely depends on for producing SDH. This of course, is the mechanism garnered for SBS from experiments where the head of a primate was potted in a metal cylinder constrained for acceleration/deceleration along a prescribed arc in a prescribed time frame.[32]

Vitamin C deficiency

An alternative explanation for some incidents contemplated as shaken baby syndrome suggests that a vitamin C deficiency may sometimes play a role in the pathogenesis of shaken baby syndrome.[33][34][35] This contested hypothesis is based upon a speculated marginal, near scorbutic condition or lack of essential nutrient(s) repletion and a potential elevated histamine level.[36][37][38] A review of this hypothesis in the journal Pediatrics International concluded that there was "no convincing evidence to conclude that vitamin C deficiency can be considered to be a cause of shaken baby syndrome", but recommended that further research be conducted, to thoroughly test the hypothesis.[39]

The proponents of such hypotheses often question the adequacy of nutrient tissue levels, especially vitamin C,[40][41] for those children currently or recently ill, bacterial infections, those with higher individual requirements, those suffering from environmental challenges (e.g. allergies), and perhaps transient vaccination-related stresses.[42] However, no cases of scurvy mimicking SBS or crib death have been reported, and scurvy typically occurs later in infancy, rarely causes death or intracranial bleeding, and is accompanied by other changes of the bones and skin and invariably an unusually deficient dietary history.[citation needed]

Gestational problems

Gestational problems affecting both mother and fetus, the birthing process, prematurity and nutritional deficits can accelerate skeletal and hemorrhagic pathologies that can also mimic SBS, even before birth.[33][43][44][45][46] These views are not widely known, utilized or explored in conventional medicine.[citation needed]

Diffuse injury

A 2001 study reported that the predominant histological abnormality in cases of inflicted head injury in the very young is diffuse hypoxic brain damage, not DAI .[19] and suggested two possible explanations: either the unmyelinated axon of the immature cerebral hemispheres is relatively resistant to traumatic damage, or in shaking-type injuries the brain is not exposed to the forces necessary to produce DAI.[47]

Force

There has been controversy regarding the amount of force required to produce the brain damage seen in shaken baby syndrome. A biomechanical experiment in 2005 demonstrated that "forceful shaking can severely injure or kill an infant, this is because the cervical spine would be severely injured and not because subdural hematomas would be caused by high head rotational accelerations… an infant head subjected to the levels of rotational velocity and acceleration called for in the SBS literature, would experience forces on the infant neck far exceeding the limits for structural failure of the cervical spine. Furthermore, shaking cervical spine injury can occur at much lower levels of head velocity and acceleration than those reported for SBS."[31] The validity of calculations performed in that study were challenged.[48][49] A detailed explanation of the calculations was provided in a "Letter To The Editors" in February of 2006.[32]

The BBC has made a documentary in 3 parts that covers arguments for and against the diagnosis of SBS.[50][51][52]

See also

  • Louise Woodward - was famously convicted of killing Matthew Eappen in 1997 by shaking him.
  • Alan Yurko - sentenced to life in prison + 10 years (1998) without parole for the murder of his son, due to shaken baby syndrome. Later released after appeal.
  • C. Alan B. Clemetson

Footnotes

  1. ^ National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (7 September 2006). "Child Maltreatment: Fact Sheet". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Retrieved 2006-10-09.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s "Shaken baby syndrome: rotational cranial injuries-technical report". Pediatrics. 108 (1): 206–10. 2001. doi:10.1542/peds.108.1.206. PMID 11433079. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  3. ^ Caffey J (1972). "On the theory and practice of shaking infants. Its potential residual effects of permanent brain damage and mental retardation". American Journal of Diseases of Children. 124 (2): 161–9. PMID 4559532. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. ^ David TJ (1999). "Shaken baby (shaken impact) syndrome: non-accidental head injury in infancy". Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 92 (11): 556–61. PMC 1297429. PMID 10703491. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  5. ^ Montelenone JA, Brodeur AE. (1994). Child Maltreatment: A Clinical Guide and Reference. St Louis: GW Medical Publishing.[page needed]
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Mraz MA (2009). "The physical manifestations of shaken baby syndrome". Journal of Forensic Nursing. 5 (1): 26–30. doi:10.1111/j.1939-3938.2009.01027.x. PMID 19222686.
  7. ^ "NINDS Shaken Baby Syndrome Information Page". National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. 2007-02-14. Retrieved 2008-06-23.
  8. ^ Types of brain injury: Shaken baby syndrome. Brain Injury Association of America. Retrieved on September 24, 2007.
  9. ^ Caffey J (1946). "Multiple fractures in the long bones of infants suffering from chronic subdural hematoma". ARJ. 56: 163–173.
  10. ^ Kempe C, Silverman F, Steele B, Droegemuller W, Silver H (1962). "The Battered-Child Syndrome". JAMA. 1: 105–112. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. ^ Clemetson CA (2006). "Caffey Revisited: A Commentary on the Origin of "Shaken Baby Syndrome."" (PDF). J Am Phys Surg. 11 (1): 20–1. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  12. ^ Caffey J (1972). "On the theory and practice of shaking infants. Its potential residual effects of permanent brain damage and mental retardation". American Journal of Diseases of Children. 124 (2): 161–9. PMID 4559532. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  13. ^ Clemetson CAB (2004). "Was it "shaken baby" or a variant of Barlow's disease?" (PDF). J Am Phys Surg". 9: 78–80.
  14. ^ Forbes BJ, Christian CW, Judkins AR, Kryston K. (2004). "Inflicted childhood neurotrauma (shaken baby syndrome): Ophthalmic findings". J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 41 (2): 80–8. PMID 15089062. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  15. ^ Patel N and Moorjani B (2007). "Neonatal injuries in child abuse". eMedicine.com.
  16. ^ a b Singh J and Stock A. 2006. Head Trauma. Emedicine.com. Retrieved on September 23, 2007.
  17. ^ Parikh S, Koch M, Narayan RK (2007). "Traumatic brain injury". International Anesthesiology Clinics. 45 (3): 119–35. doi:10.1097/AIA.0b013e318078cfe7. PMID 17622833.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  18. ^ a b Minns RA, Busuttil A (2004). "Patterns of presentation of the shaken baby syndrome: four types of inflicted brain injury predominate". BMJ. 328 (7442): 766. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7442.766. PMC 381336. PMID 15044297. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  19. ^ a b Geddes JF, Hackshaw AK, Vowles GH, Nickols CD, Whitwell HL (2001). "Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children. I. Patterns of brain damage". Brain. 124 (7): 1290–8. doi:10.1093/brain/124.7.1290. PMID 11408324. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. ^ a b c d e Oral R (2003). "Intentional head trauma in infants: Shaken baby syndrome". Virtual Children's Hospital. Archived from the original (Archived) on 2005-02-14. Retrieved 2006-10-09. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  21. ^ "Shaken Baby Syndrome Resources". American Academy of Ophthalmology.
  22. ^ a b Commonwealth Of Kentucky VS. Christopher A. Davis, Greenup Circuit Court CASE NO.04-CR 205 Cite error: The named reference "Commonwealth" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  23. ^ Commonwealth v. Christopher A. Davis, Kentucky Court of Appeals, 2006-CA-002237 [1]
  24. ^ a b c d e De Leeuw M, Jacobs W (2007). "Shaken baby syndrome: The classical clinical triad is still valid in recent court rulings". Critical Care. 11 (Supplement 2): 416. doi:10.1186/cc5576.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  25. ^ "Shaken baby convictions overturned". Special Reports. Guardian Unlimited. Thursday July 21, 2005. Retrieved 2006-10-15. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  26. ^ Ommaya AK, Faas F, Yarnell P (1968). "Whiplash injury and brain damage: an experimental study". JAMA. 22 (204(4)): 285–9. doi:10.1001/jama.204.4.285. PMID 4967499.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  27. ^ Duhaime A, Gennarelli T, Thibault L, Bruce D, Margulies S, Wiser R (1987). "The shaken baby syndrome. A clinical, pathological, and biomechanical study". J Neurosurg. 66 (3): 409–15. doi:10.3171/jns.1987.66.3.0409. PMID 3819836.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  28. ^ Prange M, Coats B, Duhaime A, Margulies S (2003). "Anthropomorphic simulations of falls, shakes, and inflicted impacts in infants". J Neurosurg. 99 (1): 143–50. doi:10.3171/jns.2003.99.1.0143. PMID 12854757. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  29. ^ Uscinski R (2004). "The Shaken Baby Syndrome" (PDF). J Am Phys Surg. 9 (3): 76–7. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  30. ^ Ommaya A, Goldsmith W, Thibault L (2002). "Biomechanics and neuropathology of adult and paediatric head injury". Br J Neurosurg. 16 (3): 220–42. doi:10.1080/02688690220148824. PMID 12201393. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  31. ^ a b Bandak F (2005). "Shaken baby syndrome: a biomechanics analysis of injury mechanisms". Forensic Sci Int. 151 (1): 71–9. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.02.033. PMID 15885948. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help) Cite error: The named reference "Bandak" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  32. ^ a b Bandak F (10 February 2006). "Response to the Letter to the Editor". Forensic Sci Int. 157 (1): 282. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.01.001. which refers to
    Marguliesa S, Prangeb M, Myersc B, Maltesed M, Jie S, Ningf X, Fisherg J, Arbogasth K and Christianh C (24 January 2006). "Letter to the Editor: Shaken baby syndrome: A flawed biomechanical analysis". Forensic Sci Int. 164: 278. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.12.018.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  33. ^ a b Clemetson CAB (2004). "Capillary Fragility as a Cause of Substantial Hemorrhage in Infants" (PDF). Medical Hypotheses and Research. 1 (2/3): 121–129. Retrieved 2009-05-19. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help) Cite error: The named reference "ClemetsonCAB" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  34. ^ Scheibner V (2001). "Shaken Baby Syndrome Diagnosis on Shaky Ground" (PDF). Journal of the Australasian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine. 20 (2): 5–8, 15. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  35. ^ Rajakumar K (2001). "Infantile scurvy: a historical perspective". Pediatrics. 108 (4): E76. doi:10.1542/peds.108.4.e76. PMID 11581484. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  36. ^ Johnston, C.S. (1996). "Chapter 10) The Antihistamine Action of Ascorbic Acid". Ascorbic Acid; Biochemistry and Biomedical Cell Biology. Vol. 25. Plenum Press. p. 189. ISBN 978-0-306-45148-5.
  37. ^ Majno G, Palade GE, Schoefl GI (1961). "Studies on inflammation. II. The site of action of histamine and serotonin along the vascular tree: a topographic study". The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology. 11: 607–26. doi:10.1083/jcb.11.3.607. PMC 2225127. PMID 14468625. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  38. ^ Gore I, Fujinami T, Shirahama T (1965). "Endothelial changes produced by ascorbic acid deficiency in guinea pigs". Archives of Pathology. 80 (4): 371–6. PMID 5319838. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  39. ^ Fung EL, Nelson EA (2004). "Could Vitamin C deficiency have a role in shaken baby syndrome?". Pediatrics International. 46 (6): 753–5. doi:10.1111/j.1442-200x.2004.01977.x. PMID 15660885. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  40. ^ Dettman G (1978). "Factor "X", sub-clinical scurvy and S.I.D.S. Historical. Part 1". The Australasian Nurses Journal. 7 (7): 2–5. PMID 418769. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  41. ^ Kalokerinos A, Dettman G (1976). "Sudden death in infancy syndrome in Western Australia". The Medical Journal of Australia. 2 (1): 31–2. PMID 979792. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  42. ^ Institute of Medicine (IOM) (1991). "Chapter 6) Evidence Concerning Pertussis Vaccines and Other Illnesses and Conditions -- Protracted Inconsolable Crying and Screaming". Adverse Effects of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines. The National Academies Press. p. 165. ISBN 0-309-04499-5. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  43. ^ Cushing H, Goodrich JT (2000). "Reprint of "Concerning Surgical Intervention for the Intracranial Hemorrhages of the New-born" by Harvey Cushing, M.D. 1905". Child's Nervous System. 16 (8): 484–92. doi:10.1007/s003810000255. PMID 11007498. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  44. ^ Williams Obstetrics (1997). "Chapter 20". Diseases and Injuries of the Fetus and Newborn. Vol. 20. Appleton & Lange, Stamford, CT. pp. 997–998. ISBN 0-8365-9638-X. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)
  45. ^ Williams Obstetrics (2005). "Chapter 29". Diseases and Injuries of the Fetus and Newborn. Vol. 22. McGraw-Hill Companies. pp. 649–691. ISBN 0-07-141315-4.
  46. ^ Looney CB, Smith JK, Merck LH; et al. (2007). "Intracranial hemorrhage in asymptomatic neonates: prevalence on MR images and relationship to obstetric and neonatal risk factors". Radiology. 242 (2): 535–41. doi:10.1148/radiol.2422060133. PMID 17179400. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  47. ^ Geddes JF, Vowles GH, Hackshaw AK, Nickols CD, Scott IS, Whitwell HL (2001). "Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children. II. Microscopic brain injury in infants". Brain. 124 (7): 1299–306. doi:10.1093/brain/124.7.1299. PMID 11408325. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  48. ^ Margulies, S; Prange, M; Myers, Bs; Maltese, Mr; Ji, S; Ning, X; Fisher, J; Arbogast, K; Christian, C (2006). "Shaken baby syndrome: a flawed biomechanical analysis". Forensic science international. 164 (2–3): 278–9, author reply 282–3. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.12.018. ISSN 0379-0738. PMID 16436323. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  49. ^ Rangarajan, N; Shams, T (2006). "Re: shaken baby syndrome: a biomechanics analysis of injury mechanisms". Forensic science international. 164 (2–3): 280–1, author reply 282–3. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.12.017. ISSN 0379-0738. PMID 16497461. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  50. ^ "Panorama Shaken Babies (BBC 1) (Part 1 of 3)". Panorama. 10 March 2008. BBC.
  51. ^ "Panorama Shaken Babies (BBC 1) (Part 2 of 3)". Panorama. BBC.
  52. ^ "Panorama Shaken Babies (BBC 1) (Part 3 of 3)". Panorama. BBC.

Further reading

Video

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shaken_baby_syndrome&oldid=312258383"