Talk:Sorority Row: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:22, 16 September 2009

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Turmoil on the front lines

Howdy. I couldn't help but notice that (valid?) spoilers--Once marked, now not. Oh well.--and (bogus?) cast additions have been coming and going through this article. Uh...WTH? A quick Google search seems to confirm the bit about Andy being the killer. (Why fully spoilers havent come out, I'm not sure.) The cast additions, not so much. I can only assume someone is adding those as a sort of "F you" to the article. Anyhow, I'll be watching, whatever happens. Wouldn't mind seeing more/quicker action/talk from other editors, though. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 23:50, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Messup and plot

Well, as is often the case when a movie comes out, there was clearly an influx of GIPUs trying to expand/fix the article. I've salvaged as best I can. Sadly, this article is far from even "C" grade status. (The film isn't that great, either.) Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 17:57, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Megan Good (Meagan Good?) as Britney"

As far as I can tell, this is bogus. I can't find any reliable reference to a Me(a)gan Good being in this movie. I don't doubt that there are African Americans present, and I think the trailer shows one such girl, but I couldn't make a clear face. Thus, in the interest of fairness and accountability, I'd recommend posting citation(s) for the other details (cast, plot, etc.), which should be relatively easy, and remove anything without a reliable source. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 17:38, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note. It is spelled Meagan Good. I know its a little weird. Just a thought. --Spiderman2351 (talk) 04:15, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Spiderman2351[reply]

Speaking of the cast list, doesn't labeling Chung's character as "The Prude" seem a bit strange considering she has sex in public in the film? It's not really important I guess, but still. -ALB —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.84.29 (talk) 05:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fun-filled = Sex?

Just a random thought, but isn't linking 'fun-filled' to 'sex' kind of silly? If that's what they mean and it's relevant to the summary, it ought to just say it as such. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.119.207.34 (talk) 17:02, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've reworded it (belatedly). Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 18:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

Just for my own curiousity, does the movie actually introduce the character of "Andy", let alone offer some reason why he would be the killer, at any point before the end when they discover he's the killer? The plot summary in this article does not appear to acknowledge Andy's existence until that revelation. Propaniac (talk) 19:33, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Andy shows up fairly early on. As for his motivation - it's stated in the movie, even if it didn't really make any sense All Hallow's (talk) 02:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arghhhh....

My wife and I were really enjoying this flick, but right from the beginning there was a pack of hoodlums a few rows back. The amount of noise grew from "nuisance" level to "unbearable" and we had to walk out literally 10 minutes from the end of the movie as we couldn't even hear the (actors') dialogue anymore. So, I guess what I'm saying is: I'm looking very forward to someone posting a full plot summary so we can find out exactly what happened!

Peace, Mike the Pharmacist (talk) 16:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Box Office

talk bout bullshit heres da link http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=sororityrow.htm heres the gross it won't let me edit it $5,059,802 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jigkiller3836 (talk • contribs) 20:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poor Grammar.

Whoever wrote this page needs to work on their punctuation. There are mistakes EVERYWERE!

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 talk bout bullshit heres da link http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=sororityrow.htm heres the gross it won't let me edit it $5,059,802  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jigkiller3836|Jigkiller3836]] ([[User talk:Jigkiller3836|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jigkiller3836|contribs]]) 20:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Poor Grammar. ==
+Whoever wrote this page needs to work on their punctuation. There are mistakes EVERYWERE!