Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neurocinema: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →Neurocinema: fix format |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::Excellent! That will be the time to create a Wikipedia article. Even if it is deleted now, nothing will keep you from creating it again once you have adequate sources. [[User:Looie496|Looie496]] ([[User talk:Looie496|talk]]) 22:05, 20 September 2009 (UTC) |
::Excellent! That will be the time to create a Wikipedia article. Even if it is deleted now, nothing will keep you from creating it again once you have adequate sources. [[User:Looie496|Looie496]] ([[User talk:Looie496|talk]]) 22:05, 20 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per Neo. [[User:Darrenhusted|Darrenhusted]] ([[User talk:Darrenhusted|talk]]) 17:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per Neo. [[User:Darrenhusted|Darrenhusted]] ([[User talk:Darrenhusted|talk]]) 17:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
Here is a link to a recent article article published on MentalFloss.com about neurocinema. http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/34584 |
|||
Revision as of 00:02, 21 September 2009
- Neurocinema (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Neologism; Google finds no hits that apply to the topic of this article. There is only one source given and it does not use this term at all. Looie496 (talk) 20:46, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- Let me correct my statement: the source does use the term once. But I still don't feel that that's enough to justify an article. Looie496 (talk) 03:28, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete: I found zero sources for this. Joe Chill (talk) 23:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 11:44, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as Neologism: the stub even says "The word "Neurocinema" was coined ... in 2009." Bearian (talk) 18:53, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Wired.com and Popular Science will cover neurocinema soon.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizardofcheese (talk • contribs)
- Excellent! That will be the time to create a Wikipedia article. Even if it is deleted now, nothing will keep you from creating it again once you have adequate sources. Looie496 (talk) 22:05, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per Neo. Darrenhusted (talk) 17:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Here is a link to a recent article article published on MentalFloss.com about neurocinema. http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/34584