Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 September 25

September 25

File:Cadet Band 1895-96.jpg

sadly, there is no proof, given the source, that this image was published before 1923; it was only 15 years old at that time. And it is not old enough to fall into the public domain if it was not published. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:21, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Cassiechadwick.jpg

sadly, not PD: "Unpublished anonymous works", per US law, must be from 1880s or earlier. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:23, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

• This image is CLEARLY outside the 70 year rule and therefore does not qualify for copyright protection. Chadwick died in 1907. This image is outside US copyright rules. Stude62 (talk) 12:19, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Holden Building Exterior.jpg

PD in Canada, but not in the US, where it must be PD. The City of Vancouver does make use of copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:45, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Nurarihyon Cover.jpg

The cover of a published manga is a copyrighted work of the publisher and artists and cannot be released under a creative commons license. —Farix (t | c) 02:00, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Ellingtonband.jpg

Copied from MySpace, states that it has been released into the Public Domain with no evidence and appears to have just been copied, with complete ignorance of copyright. k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 05:16, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Mapa walk - Kolobrzeg - Sroga.jpg

Uploaded with a pd copyright tag that speaks about photographs, but this is evidently not a photograph but a drawing, from a 1980 publication. No reason to assume this is not copyrighted. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Amyphoto.jpg

This image has never had a satisfactory fair-use rationale, nor does it have a proper license. Permission is only granted for use on Wikipedia. otherlleft 14:27, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Several requests were made to have the permission updated to include third parties. It appears that this image has been uploaded more than once and deleted for similar reasons in the past, despite the current claims of fair use.--otherlleft 19:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:18, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Ciwwanhhaco.jpg

Very likely a copyright violation and mistagged as own work. In view of the copyright owner's complaint we received via OTRS regarding File:Yasar-kemal s.jpg (see discussion above), also uploaded by this user, it appears very likely that this image was similarly just found somewhere on the Internet. The user is inactive since 2007.  Sandstein  16:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Hilmi.gif

Very likely a copyright violation and mistagged as own work. In view of the copyright owner's complaint we received via OTRS regarding File:Yasar-kemal s.jpg (see discussion above), also uploaded by this user, it appears very likely that this image was similarly just found somewhere on the Internet. The user is inactive since 2007.  Sandstein  16:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Yorum1991.jpg

Very likely a copyright violation and mistagged as own work. In view of the copyright owner's complaint we received via OTRS regarding File:Yasar-kemal s.jpg (see discussion above), also uploaded by this user, it appears very likely that this image was similarly just found somewhere on the Internet. The user is inactive since 2007.  Sandstein  16:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Natgeo censorship.jpg

This image is basically a scan (or close-on photo, or complete graphic, or whatever) of a commercial magazine's cover, or at any rate a very significant proportion of it, and so cannot possibly be covered by a Creative Commons license. ╟─TreasuryTag►Woolsack─╢ 17:51, 25 September 2009 (UTC)