Talk:Flight to Varennes: Difference between revisions
m Removing {{1911 talk}} per Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 February 4 |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{WikiProject France|class=start|importance=high}} |
{{WikiProject France|class=start|importance=high}} |
||
==Translator?== |
|||
Can some French to English translator take a look at the French version of this page and translate it into the English version? The article is much more substantial in French form. |
|||
==Count of Provence== |
==Count of Provence== |
||
"The king's eldest brother, the [[Louis XVIII of France|Count of Provence]]…" was recently and anonymously changed to "The king's ''youngest'' brother, the [[Louis XVIII of France|Count of Provence]]…" Given anonymity, lack of citation, and lack of edit summary, I suspect random vandalism, but I'm not sure. -- [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] July 9, 2005 05:47 (UTC) |
"The king's eldest brother, the [[Louis XVIII of France|Count of Provence]]…" was recently and anonymously changed to "The king's ''youngest'' brother, the [[Louis XVIII of France|Count of Provence]]…" Given anonymity, lack of citation, and lack of edit summary, I suspect random vandalism, but I'm not sure. -- [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] July 9, 2005 05:47 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:50, 4 October 2009
History Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
France Start‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Translator?
Can some French to English translator take a look at the French version of this page and translate it into the English version? The article is much more substantial in French form.
Count of Provence
"The king's eldest brother, the Count of Provence…" was recently and anonymously changed to "The king's youngest brother, the Count of Provence…" Given anonymity, lack of citation, and lack of edit summary, I suspect random vandalism, but I'm not sure. -- Jmabel | Talk July 9, 2005 05:47 (UTC)
- Judging by Louis XVIII of France, this was, indeed, random vandalism. Reverting. -- Jmabel | Talk July 9, 2005 05:48 (UTC)
Nearly complete rewrite without discussion
I would like to point out that in the last 3 months this article has seen an almost complete rewrite with no discussion and virtually no edit summaries. Since the earlier article was largely my version, I'll just suggest that someone might want to look at the earlier version for some material to incorporate back. It does not look to me like this was done by any rational process: vandals removed large portions, other people removed the obviously vandalistic passages but did not restore the missing text, people wrote other stuff, etc. - Jmabel | Talk 21:39, 3 March 2007 (UTC)