User talk:Ttonyb1

---

Wikicookie

LAAFan has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Arthur Levenson

Thanks so much for your work on this. I left some obvious errors in there. Much appreciated. I will keep working on it and get some good hard research at Carnegie-Mellon's Hunt Library.

Highest Regards, Botendaddy (talk) 03:42, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

My pleasure. You did confuse me a bit on the birth date. BTW - nice work on the article. ttonyb (talk) 03:45, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

I have an inquiry out on the birthdate already. I will post it as soon as I get it. Botendaddy (talk) 04:01, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Book war

And just what's wrong with it? A "book war" can be termed as a war on books, which is what "book burning" is, I've talked to people who call the book "Farenheit 451" the book war novel, and "Library War" can easily be confused with book war. Why do you constitute that as vandalism??? 76.66.197.30 (talk) 15:03, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Why is this a level-2 warning, since there's no level-1 on my talk page? 76.66.197.30 (talk) 15:06, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Simply put there is no way a made up, non-notable game will be confused with those topics. Please do not add the text back in. Thanks... ttonyb (talk) 15:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

It's not the made up game that's possiible to be confused with, it's the "term" book war which is why it's the {{confused}} template I used, and the hatnote format. 76.66.197.30 (talk) 15:10, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

You should note I did not object to deleting the article, but if it exists, disambiguation should exist as well. 76.66.197.30 (talk) 15:16, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

So why is it a level-2? 76.66.197.30 (talk) 15:16, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Because you intentionally replaced something that was obliviously not related to the substance of the article. Is there a reason you do not have a registered account? ttonyb (talk) 15:21, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

It is not supposed to be related to the article that's why it's a hatnote disambiguation, like we have for many articles. If it were related to the article, I would have put it into the text of the article, or in a see also section. It is not part of the article, per se, it is part of the top material for redirecting users to other topics that they would be looking for with this term, just like a disambiguation page.

As for registering for an account, why would I register for an account? 76.66.197.30 (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I understand the purpose of hatnote disambiguation; however, the topics would not be associated with a made up, non-notable game, nor would someone looking for Fahrenheit 451 look for book wars. F451 is not about "book wars" but about censorship and book burning, among other unrelated topics . "Book wars" is not the same as censorship or book burning and is not even a remotely associated term. ttonyb (talk) 15:51, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Censorship of books have been described as a book war or a war on books many many times: [1] [2] (separated by over 100 years, those two) (book war) ; and what about Library War, that's not confusable with "book war" (the term, obviously not the thing in the article)? - if you take that "book war" and "war on books" are equivalencies: [3] [4] ; so a serch for "book war" is quite possibly a search for censorship of books. Where are the book censorship articles? censorship and book burning are two. 76.66.197.30 (talk) 16:10, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

If you feel there is a real danger of this article being seen as those items you identified ,then knock yourself out. ttonyb (talk) 16:25, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Apology accepted. No hard feelings. 76.66.197.30 (talk) 16:42, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Melissa Miles McCarter

The page I created yesterday was deleted. I would like to improve on it and fix the significance aspect of this page. This is based on the note "Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lissahoop (talk • contribs) 18:25, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

I am not sure what you are asking? If you wish to get a copy of the article, you need to contact one of them to do so. ttonyb (talk) 18:28, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

It isn't clear _who_ I should ask to give me a copy of this page so I can improve the article? Plus, in all the help information that was provided to me, I have not found information about proving signficance, nor in any of the bios of authors related to this specific person, can I find significance explicitly stated. Any advice?

Click on the following link: one of these admins ttonyb (talk) 18:50, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Scott Ross (Private Investigator)‎

Thank you for your review of my first Wiki submission (Scott Ross Private Investigator), I will go through and revise. Will this page be deleted in the meantime? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pkhatibi (talk • contribs) 18:32, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

You are very welcome. Take a look at WP:BIO for specifics on what is needed to establish notability for the individual. I'll also make sure you you have a welcome message on your talk page that discusses how to create great articles. There is a chance the article will be deleted. If it is I have created a copy of the article in User:Pkhatibi/Ross. Good luck and if I can be of any help, please let me know. ttonyb (talk) 18:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

I think that you have a bit of an overinflated sense of self-importance

How dare you claim that the article on Neal Zaslavsky is puffery. There are literally dozens of public record references (minutes of publicly noticed meetings of the City Council, EPAC Commission, local newspaper articles, quotations on CBS News nationally, etc.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by NealZaslavsky (talk • contribs) 05:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Your accusatory tone

Perhaps if certain editors would not use ad hominem attacks, e.g., accusations of puffery and the like, it would not be necessary to respond with an excited tone.

If you want to be helpful, offer constructive suggestions instead. Don't attack. If you provoke by attack, you will by nature be attacked in return. Most dogs don't bite without a reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NealZaslavsky (talk • contribs) 05:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Sigh...Please read WP:CIVIL. The tags represent nothing personal only an attempt to improve the quality of Wikipedia articles. BTW - there were no "attacks against the person" so there was no ad hominem attack. ttonyb (talk) 05:39, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

You really have an over-inflated sense of self-importance. And yes, there were clearly attacks against the person. Accusing someone of puffery is clearly a personal attack. While in your pusillanimous little world, you clearly believe that you are always right and everyone else is wrong, take a long, hard look in the mirror. It ain't a pretty picture. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NealZaslavsky (talk • contribs) 05:57, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Other than pointing out that I did not accuse anyone of puffery and that I have not attacked anyone here or on the article page, I will defer to his talk page contributions. ...sigh, again... ttonyb (talk) 15:20, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

lust for vengeance and hookers in revolt

Hey I'm kind of new to this so I want to make sure I follow the rules properly, maybe you can help me with a few things. What was wrong with the last plot I put in for Lust for Vengeance, I only used one line from allmovie as a reference to a outside source, most movies don't have any citations for plots at all. Also with both movies why are you putting up notability warnings, they are referenced on several other pages, they have citations, they have 7 links to other sites, they have been up for months prior to your flags, and they have thousands of links when they are googled, what is it exactly you think they need for these warnings and edits to stop, thanks in advance for taking the time to read this and I look forward to hearing back from you, I love this site and when I do add things and put new things up, I'd like to make sure I'm doing it the right way, thanks.Rogueonea (talk) 19:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the message and welcome. It looks like the whole section was a copy of existing copyrighted material. I found it on Rotten Tomatoes and on Amazon. An easy way to avoid the copyright issue is to rewrite the text. Something this short should not be too hard. The reason I have marked the films with notability tags is they do not appear to meet the criteria in WP:NOTFILM. References 2 and 5 in the article are the closest to meeting the criteria, but I am not sure they are natiionally known. Can you show that the film , "is widely distributed and has received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics?" Let me know what I can do to help. Thanks... ttonyb (talk) 20:25, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

I rewrote the plots as to avoid copyright issues, as for national reviewers they have both been reviewed by DVD verdict and Mr. Skin which are two of the biggest sites that review direct-to-dvd movies and lust was reviewed by Dennis Schwartz whose a national reviewer that has his own website and his review for lust is also on rotten tomatoes and in addition he's a member of, The Online Film Critics Society. Let me know if this solves the issues, hopefully it does, if not please let me know what else I can do, thanks Rogueonea (talk) 21:38, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Richard Ringer Nominated For Deletion

ttonyb1, the description of "Richard Ringer" music and accomplishments,(including the Digital Media X award) is heavily based on Interviews in NYC with Harold Channer and are available from Channer's website and youtube. These links are cited. Harold Channer is a widely respected Talk Show host based in New York City, and has his own Wikipedia page as well. I assume you have not watched the full 57 minute interview, because your numerous nominations for deletion of this began less than 57 minutes after its release.

Some of your claims of not supporting importance are valid, such as the claim of being high on the worldwide icompositions chart. I have edited in a reference to an Internet Archive of the icompositions.com home page June 2, 2006 which validates this statement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Independent Music Source (talk • contribs) 22:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Wetfetrhget

why am i in troble al i am doing is having sum fun :(

The oblivious reason is your vandalism is taking me and other editors away from working on valid articles. ttonyb (talk) 04:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Nucleus Medical Media

Hey I am a intern at Nucleus Medical Media. The page that you just deleted was the same page that Nucleus Medical Art is. We changed are name and I could not find a way to change the name on the page so I created a new one. Could you please put it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JKurz1 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

The article is about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject and was subsequently deleted by an admin. It mostly likely will be deleted again unless it can meet the criteria in WP:COMPANY. To get a copy of your article, please click on the following link: one of these admins. Also please read WP:COI. ttonyb (talk) 19:37, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

The reason we decided to make a page is because we were mentioned in the page about medical animators. We just want to educate people about what a medical animator can do.

Unless the article meets the criteria in WP:COMPANY it will be deleted. ttonyb (talk) 19:46, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

reliable: Reliability is what makes Nucleus go around. The Reliability of the company lies within every piece of published work. I could take off all of the external links to the company's websites. That way we are only putting information about the company.

independent: All of are animations and images are put through rigorous tests to determine if they are of the best quality and accuracy.

secondary sources: Secondary review is always done. Licensed Medical illustrators create the work and then a panel of licensed reviewers make sure that every detail is accounted for.

Nucleus Medical Media does make a change in the world. It helps educate people about unknown effects of surgery and or other medical issues. There is no reason to advertise on Wikipedia. The reason to put this page here is to let poeple know what the standard of Medical Illustrations are and how Nucleus Medical Media meets those with every bit of information they put out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JKurz1 (talk • contribs) 20:29, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

How does this meet the criteria in WP:COMPANY? ttonyb (talk) 21:26, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Removed article from talk page and replaced it with [5]

The 2009 SIGGRAPH Computer Animation Festival will be held in New Orleans from August 4 - 7. For more information, visit http://www.siggraph.org/s2009/computer_animation_festival/juried/index.php Does this make Nucleus Medical Media credited by other sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JKurz1 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

This is not really an article, but rather a Press Release that does not meet the criteria for support of an article. ttonyb (talk) 21:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

CGChannel.com Article

A distinctively different medical art -creation and -distribution company called Nucleus Medical Art, Inc., located in Kennesaw, Georgia, is a "hub" - and an energized flurry-of clinical creativity generating some of the most highly respected digital medical art in the business. <a href=[ http://mos.futurenet.com/resources/3dworld/TDW93.pv_open_lpdf.pdf>read more</a>

This is not significant coverage of the company. ttonyb (talk) 21:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Imagine Animation Magazine Article

The medical profession is a new frontier for animators who are increasingly being called upon to recreate the workings of the human body. Imagine go

Nothing to indicate significant coverage ttonyb (talk) 21:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Nucleus Medical Art on Oprah

Nucleus is credited for making the world's most viewed medical animation on the Internet. They have a very clear and simple style that's perfect for diverse audiences. It's no wonder Oprah approached them for their animation. Congratulations Nucleus!read more. [6]

Nothing to indicate significant coverage ttonyb (talk) 21:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

The World's Most Popular Medical Animation

his medical animation on vaginal childbirth by Nucleus Medical Art may just be the most widely viewed medical animation in the world. So far, the animation has been watched over 950,000 times on Youtube and over 2,000,000 times on the company's web site... [7] and thats not all!!!

This is not really an article, but rather a Press Release that does not meet the criteria for support of an article. ttonyb (talk) 21:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Newscom Partnership

Washington D.C. NewsCom, a leading worldwide provider of news and visual content, announced today that it has added Nucleus Medical Art, Inc., to its extensive roster of industry-leading content partners. Founded in 1997, Nucleus offers more than 12,000 full-color medical illustrations, animations, interactive media and other communications content. read more.[8] and thats not all!!!

This is not really an article, but rather a Press Release that does not meet the criteria for support of an article. ttonyb (talk) 21:56, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

(Outdent) I suggest you read the links provided in the welcome message on your talk page. There are some good discussions on what makes a great article and how to provide support. In addition see sources. ttonyb (talk) 22:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Greg Tseng Article

Hello Ttonyb1, I was working on making the article more neutral when my save was interrupted by your update. Please feel free to edit the article as well as Mr. Tseng is a well known figure and should have a worthwhile entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luitgard (talk • contribs)

You may want to create the article in a User/sandbox and then upload it to the mainspace. ttonyb (talk) 20:16, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Lia Grimanis - Thanks for the changes!

There are two of us trying to put together this page and we're very new at it. Wow you work fast! Thanks for your help! If you have any other suggestions for fixing anything, please let us know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chuckkay (talk • contribs) 20:15, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

My pleasure... ttonyb (talk) 20:17, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Alex Lingwood

I'm sorry for removing the tags on Alex Lingwood. I thought when I added the working links to the references yesterday that justified removing the tags. Sorry about that.

Thanks for the message. No problem... ttonyb (talk) 23:44, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Knights of Ares deletion page

its saying that my knights of ares page is going to be deleted cus it found similar info on the website link i gave. i created the website and that is why the information is that same. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GTO75 (talk • contribs) 02:27, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Since you own the material you need to donate the material to Wikipedia. Please see donating copyrighted material to Wikipedia. ttonyb (talk) 02:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Massachusetts Broadcasters Association

hello Ttonyb,

My Massachusetts Broadcasting Association page has been earmarked for deletion because of copyright infringement. The advertising agency I work for has worked closely with the MBA for many years and the content that you claim was copyrighted was actually taken right from our site at www.massbroadcasters.org. ([9]). I am new to building wiki pages, so I am not really sure how the process goes of how I prove to you that I am working for the MBA and that we in fact are the original copyright owners of the content. If you would like to call the MBA at (Removed phone and e-mail addresses ttonyb (talk) 17:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC))bggadvertisingBggadvertising (talk) 17:13, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Because the site material is copyrighted, the owner of the material will need to donate the material for use in Wikipedia. Please see donating copyrighted material to Wikipedia. The only other option is to rewrite the material or change the copyright license to one compatible with WP:GFDL. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks... ttonyb (talk) 17:25, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

I just wanna be on wikipedia

I'm sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Funnyjake06 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

General Comment

hi dude or dudette i am wondering why are you allowed to tell us what we arent allowed to write? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72ep (talk • contribs) 00:32, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia is a community of contributors such as yourself. We all have access to the same tools and guidelines and all have the ability to contribute either by creating or editing articles. In order to help insure the quality of articles, all articles need to follow the guidelines set up in Wikipedia and all are articles are subject to review. Any editor, including yourself, can review an article and make changes to it or in certain circumstances nominate it for deletion. We, as editors, do not tell anyone what can be on Wikipedia, we only point out those articles that do not meet the criteria for inclusion into Wikipedia. My best to you and please let me know if you have any more questions. ttonyb (talk) 01:00, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

we the fearless

they are a legit band and they play lots of real shows, so please dont try to delete this page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Partytime619 (talk • contribs) 05:06, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately the article fails to meet the criteria in WP:BAND. I suggest you review the criteria and if you have any questions, let me know. Until it meets the criteria, it will be subject to deletion. ttonyb (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Marion Janet Harron

Just a friendly note on Marion Janet Harron. I declined the speedy and instead added a sentence to turn it into a valid stub. Cheers! --Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:16, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I was also looking for items to add to the article and saw you had beat me to it. I'll see if I can add anything. Thanks... ttonyb (talk) 22:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi Tony, can you help me?

I made an article about an interesting artist I whose work I saw in Portland OR, who has exhibited internationally. I even included references from a gallery in Berlin, external links to their website, affiliated projects etc....and you flagged it for not having notability. Can you help me out? This is my first wiki-contribution.

How can I make this right? I don't really understand what you think it's missing? I looked at many others of artists and they often only have links to galleries since most shows get reviewed on art blogs etc, and there-for most reviews are not wiki-appropriate (I think I am understanding that correctly).

Thanks kindly, S SandyPortland (talk) 04:45, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi, SandyPortland, I assume you are talking about Natasha Wheat. The issue here is the article fails to establish Wikipedia defined notability for the artist. The individual has to meet one of the five criteria listed in that section. The references you have included do not amount to significant coverage of the subject. Also take a look at verifiability for some help on references. I have left you a message on your talk page with a number of links that should help you create a great article. If you have any questions, please let me know. ttonyb (talk) 05:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello again,

I like this, Wiki rules: "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia ignore it".

I also read the 5 pillars and through again and it seems that this qualifies for "People who are relatively unknown", as well as in the artist notability section under artists who have work in signifigant permanent collections. I followed the guidelines and left of personal info and info from blogs. I included references from a gallery (secondary source) website, artist website, and artist residency they exhibited at. I had to call the Museum after this exhibition to find out whose work was included, and was glad that the artist's gallery website had their showing at the MCA Chicago and contribution to the collection listed publicly on the internet, as museums don't list their collections publicly without inquiry. That is where an encyclopedia page would be helpful, and the reason wiki has inclusion in collections as published by a secondary source, listed as acceptable artist notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SandyPortland (talk • contribs) 08:37, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Morpher Radio

Thanks I was about to tag it actually but you beat me to it! I'm not convinced it is that notable but I don't think it met speedy criteria.. Himalayan 15:36, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I had vacillated before marking it for CSD. Enjoy the day/evening. ttonyb (talk) 15:38, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

1994 RFPP

I'm declining your RFPP on 1994 because the activity level hasn't been terribly high. However, if it continues at the same level (3+ vandals per day), I'll protect it after perhaps ~5 more days of that level. It just isn't an immediate issue. Sound good? tedder (talk) 05:05, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, but I did not request a RFPP. Perhaps User talk:Andrewlp1991? ttonyb (talk) 05:11, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

doh! Sorry for the confusion. I mixed up usernames since you'd reverted on 1994 recently. Copying to his page, feel free to remove this or leave it. tedder (talk) 05:24, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

8-) ttonyb (talk) 05:26, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

NeutraliseIT

The article NeutraliseIT has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable product lacking GHit nad GNEWS support. ttonyb (talk) 05:11, 18 October 2009 (UTC) While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Dated prod notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Dated prod will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 05:11, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi,

What is GHit and GNEWS? Wikipedia is so confusing to how you are meant to understand all this and follow the appropriate guidlines. I tried searching and couldn't find info on GHit and GNEWS anywhere.

Spillon (talk) 05:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Ghits = "Google Hits", the number of results that Google produces for a given search term.

GNews="Google News Hits", the number of results when using the Google News search, searching for all dates.  Chzz  ►  05:22, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

But neutraliseit and neutraliseit.com.au does produce google hits and come up in google. I don't understandSpillon (talk) 06:12, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Royal-T a YAA company

A tag has been placed on Royal-T a YAA company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 04:58, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

First of all sorry for deleting the tag initially. I didn't mean to but did it accidentally and then didn't know how to get it back.

Second, I left a message here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Royal-T_a_YAA_company

The site http://www.linkedin.com/companies/royal-t, is my own page and sources. Spillon (talk) 05:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, GHits = Google Hits and GNEWS = Google News hits. There does not seem to be enough independent, verifiable references to support the article. Published material is considered to be copyrighted. In order to use the material in Wikipedia you will need to donate copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Take a look at the section and let me know if you have any questions. ttonyb (talk) 05:21, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I've looked there and think I understand. However I don't know what I have to do to rectify this problem and make sure this article does not get deleted. Could you please explain a step by step process that I would have to undergo in order to prevent this from being deleted, and prove that it is not a breach of copyright? I don't understand how it would be, since I created the page: http://www.linkedin.com/companies/royal-t. Could you please help and explain how it is a breach of copyright so that I may understand better? Spillon (talk) 06:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

alex the big

Hi! im the guy who wrote alex the big and since you deleted it im mad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Littleboi (talk • contribs) 06:15, 18 October 2009 (UTC)