Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 01:15, 4 November 2009

Rollback (add request)

User:BlueVista

BlueVista (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Alternate account of The Arbiter, who has the rollback permission. For use in public computers. BlueVista (talk) 01:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Stavlor

Stavlor (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I revert alot of vandelism and would like to try huggle wich requires rollback permission Stavlor^{Talk Contribs} 21:52, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Not many recent edits but your reversions in the past were accurate. -- Menti fisto 21:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have been editing here on wikipedia for so long now. I have never heard of Rollback or Huggle, but I would like permission to be able to try both features out. I am a type of person that always loves trying the newest and latest features out first, and sometimes there are times when I am not the first. I like trying exciting features out on different sites that I have never tried before. Please give me this permission.

Not done Please sign in to request this permission. Pedro : Chat 12:48, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nezzadar

Nezzadar (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I have been doing RCP for a while and really dislike how cumbersome undo is for multiple bad edits. I find too often vandals make 10 small changes hoping to get one through, rather than one big one that will be reverted on sight. Nezzadar ^[SPEAK] 05:45, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Noting historical block and talk archive, but I don't see any problems here. Pedro : Chat 12:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Micwa

Micwa (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I fight a lot of vandalism daily. This would make things a lot easier. - Mike Allen ^{talk · contribs} 03:52, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Pedro : Chat 12:49, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rrmsjp

Rrmsjp (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I am a rollbacker in the Spanish Wikipedia (You can verify it here, and I think I can use this flag here to help English wikipedia too. If there are too many vandalism in the Spanish Wikipedia, I think I can find more here.

Rrmsjp (Need something?) 02:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Sorry my friend, I need to see at least some evidence here at en.wiki that you're interested in vandal fighting and warning vandals. I won't require the same minimum requirements as normal, since you have the tool elsewhere, but <30 edits on this project doesn't really display much interest. When you think you meet expectations, feel free to come back here or to my talk page. Thanks. upstate NYer 02:59, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:K10wnsta

K10wnsta (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Although it's unlikely I'd ever actually use it, it seems the permission is required for Huggle to function. K10wnsta (talk) 23:09, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you won't use it why do you request it? Huggle requires rollback, yes, but with no prior reversion of vandalism how are we able to know whether you know what consists of vandalism and what doesn't? Please use some manual alternatives for now (if not undo) - WP:TW or any of these tools and return in a week or so. -- Menti fisto 23:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Acc3ss

Acc3ss (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I'm strongly against vandalism on Wikipedia, and would like to request rollback rights so that I can use the Huggle application. Nick Klose ^(tc) 17:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. I appreciate your contributions thusfar, however I only see one recent revert of vandalism. I'd like to see much more extensive vandal fighting before granting rollback. Valley2city^‽ 19:13, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair. I'll re-apply once I have more counter-vandalism activity on my record. Nick Klose ^(tc) 20:07, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Specs112

Specs112 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I have been doing RC Patrol and I would like Rollback to revert vandalism faster and to use Huggle. Specs112 02:15, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Done Pedro : Chat 08:26, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Krazycev13

Krazycev13 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I'm already in the CVU, and I already frequently go through articles to remove vandalism, because I can't stand it. --Krazycev 13 ^{other crap} 19:29, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. NW (Talk) 20:50, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:trakesht

Trakesht (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I had been involved in some antivandalism work in India related articles and it will be helpful if I can get rollback so that I can also give huggle a shot trakesht (talk) 11:49, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks, JamieS93 19:33, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:smvantol

Smvantol (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I am the web master of the page www.AnthonyManess.com, therefore, I am copying and pasting my own words, which can be confirmed with Mr. Anthony Maness at his e-mail address: Anthony.Maness@cmworks.com. Thank you for your consideration. Smvantol (talk) 11:06, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This isn't the place to explain copyright violations. This is for requesting the rollback tool. either way (talk) 11:12, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Halvorsen brian

Halvorsen brian (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I have been coming upon a lot of vandalism lately and believe that I could utilize this right to help fight it. I mainly focus my edits on baseball articles but I always revert any vandalism when I come upon it. Brian Halvorsen (talk) 01:41, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Skier Dude (talk) 02:17, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:HamburgerRadio

HamburgerRadio (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

To remove vandalism in Computer Security articles. Also, I would like to try Huggle at some point. HamburgerRadio (talk) 18:27, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Make sure to only use it for obvious vandalism; I only say this because you tend to work with removing other issues such as unsourced info, promotion, etc, instead of vandalism-only work. Best, JamieS93 18:31, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. --HamburgerRadio (talk) 18:32, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Felyza

Felyza (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I keep hitting the limit of 2 or 3 per every few minutes, and my understanding is that this removes the limit. FELYZA 18:23, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Acalamari 18:40, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dac04

Dac04 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I have been active in recent changes and newpage patrolling, and I feel that I have become pretty effective using Twinkle. I would like rollback rights to fight vandalism with Huggle. Dac04 (talk) 03:48, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Pedro : Chat 07:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Dac04 (talk) 13:51, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Spade of Aces

Spade of Aces (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

This is a legitimate alternate account of current rollbacker Ace of Spades (confirmation here). Requesting rollback permission to utilize this account on potentially unsafe internet connections such as to avoid account compromise. Thank you. ♠The Spade of Aces_(????) 20:34, 25 October 2009 (UTC) 02:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done! --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 02:15, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:UltraMagnus

UltraMagnus (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I have been using twinkle for some time to revert vandalism, however this seems like it could be more efficient. - UltraMagnus^speak 21:47, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And....

Done second time's the charm :) Pedro : Chat 21:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and thank you again for your patience --UltraMagnus^speak 21:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Declan Clam

Declan Clam (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I've been doing a bit of recent change patrolling with Twinkle, would like to see if I could be more efficient with rollback. Reckon I've got a pretty good handle on when something is vandalism, when it's just unhelpful and when to play safe. Declan Clam (talk) 06:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for helping. As an aside, I must say I agree that your custom tag for the article ABRAHAM LINCOLN is hilarious. Though it technically wasn't a G6 (no pun intended; G6=technical deletions) it still made me laugh out loud. "He probably already has a page". Awesome. Valley2city^‽ 07:07, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet, thanks. Declan Clam (talk) 07:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:The Arbiter

The Arbiter (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Although I do add and contribute to articles, I mostly find myself browsing through the recent changes list and other places to revert vandalism. I place pages on my watchlist to monitor them for changes. Sometimes, it is very annoying when an IP address makes a ton of edits that are almost impossible to undo using the "undo" function. Therefore, rollback would be an invaluable tool in my contributions to Wikipedia. The Arbiter^★_★^★ 01:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done You have few reverts, but all of them were very good. Keep it up. Acalamari 02:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jhbuk

Jhbuk (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Many of my edits involve undoing vandalism I come across and this feature would enable me to perform this task more effectively and quickly. Jhbuk (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- Menti fisto 15:56, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Doomsdayer520

Doomsdayer520 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I encounter many acts of vandalism while reading articles on music and politics, and would like to be more involved in the Wikipedia:Counter Vandalism Unit. My involvement with Wikipedia is increasing so I'd like to do my part as an active editor. Thanks. Doomsdayer520 (talk) 09:26, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Pedro : Chat 10:01, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Doomsdayer520 (talk) 10:04, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:The359

The359 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I watch a great many articles, many of them frequently vandalized, and would appreciate anything that could help me deal with it quicker. ^IIIV_IX (Talk) 08:01, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Nja²⁴⁷ 08:16, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shlomke

Shlomke (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I've been using Twinkle to revert vandalism in the past and again recently. It seems that the Rollback feature needed to use Huggle would make it faster and easier Shlomke (talk) 02:01, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Nja²⁴⁷ 07:29, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Shlomke (talk) 16:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fastilysock

Fastilysock (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I think I know how to use this tool :) -FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 21:08, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You could've done it yourself. :P –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:14, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Frmatt

Frmatt (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I am requesting that Frmatt be blocked from using the Rollback feature. Recently, Frmatt identified edits to UTC-3 and UTC-2 as being vandalism when in fact I was correcting inaccurate information on both of those pages. After two warnings and reverts from him for vandalism (as shown on my talk page), he finally realized that my edits were not vandalism, and his reverts actually put back the old, inaccurate information. I understand that vandalism is an issue on Wikipedia, but since I began using and editing over five years ago (which you can't see from my talk page since my ISP changes my IP address every so often), I am finding that Wikipedia has increasingly strayed from its welcoming environment based on good faith to one that has become downright hostile to anonymous users, vandals and non-vandals alike. I realize that Frmatt is not alone in automatically dismissing anonymous edits without a summary as vandalism without actually taking a look at the edit; however, this attitude is turning many good faith anonymous editors away because they simply do not want to enter into secondary discussions with editors who automatically think every anonymous edit is vandalism without reading the edit. In the case of these two articles, a simple, 10-second Google search would have corroborated my edits. Each editor has his or her reason why he or she wishes to edit through an account or anonymously; there was never a requirement that edits come from registered accounts. We need to make a more welcoming environment for ALL good faith editors, and therefore, I feel that "too quick to the gun" editors that do not assume good faith should unfortunately have privileges such as Rollback suspended whenever they can be identified. 68.199.153.220 (talk) 18:35, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Although Frmatt is a rollbacker, he was actually using Twinkle with those reverts, so it's not an actual abuse of the tool. JamieS93 18:37, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Hi, please try discussing with the user first, and please add a summary when removing content. That way we can better identify good edits. :-) Thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:39, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peter, I did talk the user and leave him a message regarding my request. The point is that Frmatt did not show that same courtesy you are asking of me (and which I did) in terms of communicating with him. Before placing a note on my talk page asking about any doubts, Frmatt simply dismissed the edits as vandalism and reverted them. Leaving an Edit Summary is advisable and helpful but not required, and certainly, the lack of one does not imply vandalism. I believe Frmatt needs to be more thoughtful prior to dismissing edits as vandalism.68.199.153.220 (talk) 18:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anandks007

Anandks007 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Everyday I am facing dozens of cases of page blanking by anonymous IPs. Vandalism is easier to deal with, but page blanking by anyonymous users with dynamic IPs are wasting huge amount of my time. Axxn (talk) 14:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:18, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Julian. Thank you so much. Please advise me if you find anything wrong with my edits. Axxn (talk) 03:51, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Eugeniu B

Eugeniu B (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I have dealt with vandalism often in the past and find it very annoying when there are multiple edits by the same user after a vandalism edit, which causes me to have to construct my own edit summary when I'm replacing the article contents with the last non-vandalism edit. I've used the rollback feature in the past as an administrator on a non-Wikipedia wiki and have a good experience with its usefulness. - Eugeniu B msg 18:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugeniu B, I'm having a hard time finding any more than a handful of reversions in your edit history nor AIV reports. Could you provide anything that shows your experience with fighting vandalism or your use of rollback on this non-wikipedia wiki. I would like to have a little more information before granting rollback. Thanks, Valley2city^‽ 20:12, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted vandalism in the past, but it's always those two-or-more edits that bother me. I always have to construct my own edit summary to look like normal undos, like "Undid revision ### by A user (talk) to last revision by Such and such...", which seems like a waste of time to me, and prevents me from being able to undo vandalism (or any other edits that should be reversed) very quickly. As for using rollback on another wiki, I only included that statement to demonstrate that I have used rollback before and already know exactly how to use it properly. Eugeniu B msg 22:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done I checked that your undos are quite low (only a dozen over the past 1000 edits dating back to March of this year) but your other edits including warnings to vandals pages are of good quality so I have gone ahead and granted rollback. Thank you for your patience and use it well. Valley2city^‽ 04:27, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doumo arigatou gozaimasu! (thank you very much) Eugeniu B msg 04:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Captain-n00dle

Captain-n00dle (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I have been using twinkle to revert vandalism for a while now but apparently huggle is much more productive, I have ~700 edits and hope to make a few more! ^_^ Regards, Captain n00dle ^T/_C 11:32, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done and thanks for helping. PeterSymonds (talk) 11:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:JL 09

JL 09 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

(I want to have rights to remove vandalism immediately without hassle!)

My rollback right was removed by an admin some few weeks ago because of an editing conflict. I agreed to Spartaz's notification to remove my rollback rights and he is willing to restore it if any case will happen. I am fighting with vandalism, but it is always turning out that the vandalism done by a user, or an anonymous IP is filled the history page of an article that made restoration to "good revision" is no longer possible. With rollbacking, it can be done. Thanks. - JL 09 ^_q?_{_c} 13:31, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Spartaz recommended a couple of months but it has been only a couple of weeks. Whilst you have made good (although litmited)use of manual reversion and WP:UNDO this looks a bit premature to me. Your could approach Spartaz directly and ask him to consider. Pedro : Chat 13:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. i'll consider that option.--JL 09 ^_q?_{_c} 13:50, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Adding this tag for archiving. either way (talk) 11:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 <!--    ADD REQUESTS ****BELOW**** THIS LINE.   -->
 *
+====[[User:BlueVista]]====
+*<span class="plainlinks">[[User:BlueVista|{{ucfirst:BlueVista}}]] ([[User talk:BlueVista|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/BlueVista|contribs]] · [[Special:DeletedContributions/BlueVista|deleted]] · [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/index.php?name={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:BlueVista}}}}&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia count] · {{ plainlink | url=http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pages/index.php?name={{urlencode:BlueVista}}&namespace=0&redirects=noredirects | name=pages created}} · [{{fullurl:Special:Log|user={{anchorencode:{{ucfirst:BlueVista}}}}}} logs] · [{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{anchorencode:{{ucfirst:BlueVista}}}}}} block&nbsp;log] · [{{fullurl:Special:Listusers|limit=1&username={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:BlueVista}}}}}} lu] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{ucfirst:BlueVista}}|rfar]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/{{ucfirst:BlueVista}}|rfc]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:BlueVista}}|rfcu]] · [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/{{ucfirst:BlueVista}}|ssp]] · [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{ucfirst:BlueVista}}|spi]] · [http://toolserver.org/~eagle/archivesearch.php?search=%28%5C%7B%5C%7B%5B%5E%5B%5D*%5C%7C%7C%5B%5E%7C%3A%2FA-Za-z0-9%5D%7C%5E%29{{urlencode:BlueVista}}%5B%5EA-Za-z0-9%5D&useregex=1&where%5B%5D=enpedia_3rr&where%5B%5D=enpedia_an&where%5B%5D=enpedia_ani&where%5B%5D=enpedia_cn search an, ani, cn, an3]</span>) ([[Special:Userrights/BlueVista|<span style="color:#002bb8">'''assign permissions'''</span>]])
+:Alternate account of The Arbiter, who has the rollback permission. For use in public computers. [[User:BlueVista|BlueVista]] ([[User talk:BlueVista|talk]]) 01:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 ====[[User:Stavlor]]====
 *<span class="plainlinks">[[User:Stavlor|{{ucfirst:Stavlor}}]] ([[User talk:Stavlor|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Stavlor|contribs]] · [[Special:DeletedContributions/Stavlor|deleted]] · [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/index.php?name={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Stavlor}}}}&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia count] · {{ plainlink | url=http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pages/index.php?name={{urlencode:Stavlor}}&namespace=0&redirects=noredirects | name=pages created}} · [{{fullurl:Special:Log|user={{anchorencode:{{ucfirst:Stavlor}}}}}} logs] · [{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{anchorencode:{{ucfirst:Stavlor}}}}}} block&nbsp;log] · [{{fullurl:Special:Listusers|limit=1&username={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Stavlor}}}}}} lu] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{ucfirst:Stavlor}}|rfar]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/{{ucfirst:Stavlor}}|rfc]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:Stavlor}}|rfcu]] · [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/{{ucfirst:Stavlor}}|ssp]] · [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{ucfirst:Stavlor}}|spi]] · [http://toolserver.org/~eagle/archivesearch.php?search=%28%5C%7B%5C%7B%5B%5E%5B%5D*%5C%7C%7C%5B%5E%7C%3A%2FA-Za-z0-9%5D%7C%5E%29{{urlencode:Stavlor}}%5B%5EA-Za-z0-9%5D&useregex=1&where%5B%5D=enpedia_3rr&where%5B%5D=enpedia_an&where%5B%5D=enpedia_ani&where%5B%5D=enpedia_cn search an, ani, cn, an3]</span>) ([[Special:Userrights/Stavlor|<span style="color:#002bb8">'''assign permissions'''</span>]])