Talk:Tourism in Puducherry: Difference between revisions
→Improvements: new section |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Contributer's Note== |
==Contributer's Note== |
||
Hai people from pondicherry, u can help to improve this article by adding new destinations(new monuments,Heritage buildings,list of resorts etc) |
Hai people from pondicherry, u can help to improve this article by adding new destinations(new monuments,Heritage buildings,list of resorts etc).. thank you. [[User:Varun_swm|Varun_swm]] |
||
==Not related to Wikiprokect:Indian Cities== |
==Not related to Wikiprokect:Indian Cities== |
||
Revision as of 03:50, 18 November 2009
 | A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article. |
 | India: Puducherry C‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
.svg)
Contributer's Note
Hai people from pondicherry, u can help to improve this article by adding new destinations(new monuments,Heritage buildings,list of resorts etc).. thank you. Varun_swm
I don't think this article in any way is a City article and therefore the WP Indian Cities needed to be removed.--Sharadbob (talk) 15:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Improvements
There were still numerous peacock terms in the article after the latest round of edits. I have taken them out and added tags indicating where additional references are needed. Reminder: articles are not for promotion or advertising but should describe the subject from a neutral point of view. Also, this article seems to rely heavily on primary sources (e.g., tourism sites). Ideally, references should come from secondary sources as they are more neutral. Lastly, I fixed the formatting for the first reference to show how it's done. Someone may want to go through and fix the rest. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 15:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)