User talk:Nathan: Difference between revisions
Juliancolton (talk | contribs) →RfB poll: new section |
Firefly322 (talk | contribs) →RfB poll: Stop please. |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Hey. Someone at the [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship#RfB|WT:RFA]] thread suggested that another RfB poll might be needed. I'm not sure that's a good idea, but I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts. –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]''' | [[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 17:50, 19 November 2009 (UTC) |
Hey. Someone at the [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship#RfB|WT:RFA]] thread suggested that another RfB poll might be needed. I'm not sure that's a good idea, but I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts. –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]''' | [[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 17:50, 19 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
Don't touch my talk page anymore. Take up somewhere else if you have a problem with what I've written. Thanks. --[[User:Firefly322|Firefly322]] ([[User talk:Firefly322|talk]]) 23:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:38, 19 November 2009
 | Currently in an extended period of limited activity. If you leave a message here, it may be a day or longer before I am able to respond. |
| This is Nathan's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop
As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Additional information needed on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chandler Bonor
Hello. Thank you for filing Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chandler Bonor. This is an automated notice to inform you that the case is currently missing a code letter, which indicates to checkusers why a check is valid. Please revisit the page and add this. Sincerely, SPCUClerkbot (talk) 21:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
You were mentioned at this RFC/U
Since you had commented on his talk page, you got mentioned in the write-up at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Dbachmann 4. You are welcome to certify the dispute if you agree with what Rd232, Skomorokh and I came up with or to say otherwise.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 23:41, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Secret voting
Hi Nathan. I was troubled to see you signed on for secret ballots. I understand the arguments for it, but it is so fundamentally contrary to our traditions of being an open and transparent community I was disappointed to see you supporting that position. Accountability is also very important. I hope you'll reconsider. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:20, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
RfB poll
Hey. Someone at the WT:RFA thread suggested that another RfB poll might be needed. I'm not sure that's a good idea, but I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:50, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Don't touch my talk page anymore. Take up somewhere else if you have a problem with what I've written. Thanks. --Firefly322 (talk) 23:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)