User talk:KnightLago: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 4d) to User talk:KnightLago/Archive 5. |
Poeticbent (talk | contribs) →Re: EEML: new section |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Typo in your questions: "All of these opinions have to been listened too." [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 13:29, 20 November 2009 (UTC) |
Typo in your questions: "All of these opinions have to been listened too." [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 13:29, 20 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Re: EEML == |
|||
Thanks for the warning. I appreciate that, but would you please act on your own policy with that regard, and do something about a similar warning issued by Manning on 29 October 2009 to user Pantherskin who does not know where to stop. He’s been [[wiki: hounding]] me for weeks and ignoring Manning’s repeated pleas to stop the "flamebaiting". I’m understandably upset about these character assassinations and attacks driven by vengeance, which have nothing to do with the ongoing discussion. Pantherskin wants to have the last word always, regardless of what YOU say. He is not a party to these proceedings and came from the sidelines only to harass others. I did nothing wrong to begin with, and if ArbCom sees no reason to penalize me for EEML, I don’t need to be victimized by problem users during these proceedings either. In a way, your formal warning to me, but not to Pantherskin, tends to exonerate him in this instance. I am grateful for your patience. --[[User:Poeticbent|<font face="Papyrus" color="darkblue"><b>Poeticbent</b></font>]] [[User_talk:Poeticbent|<small><font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk</font></small>]] 17:28, 21 November 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:28, 21 November 2009
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
|
||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser begins
- Bulgarian award: Bulgarian Wikipedia gets a prestigious award
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Several candidates standing
- In the news: German lawsuit, Jimbo interview and more
- Sister projects: Wiktionary interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Move
Hello, as a clerk of WP:EEML, could you please consider moving this long section, which has potential in tripling in size soon, to workshop. It is rather troubling to access remaining topics and in general, workshop pages are more appropriate for the various "polls", IMO. Thanks, M.K. (talk) 12:06, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. That part is just a noise with limited substance indeed, in any case it is good to know, that somebody still looking closely over this. Cya, M.K. (talk) 14:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Just a note :)
Typo in your questions: "All of these opinions have to been listened too." SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:29, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Re: EEML
Thanks for the warning. I appreciate that, but would you please act on your own policy with that regard, and do something about a similar warning issued by Manning on 29 October 2009 to user Pantherskin who does not know where to stop. He’s been wiki: hounding me for weeks and ignoring Manning’s repeated pleas to stop the "flamebaiting". I’m understandably upset about these character assassinations and attacks driven by vengeance, which have nothing to do with the ongoing discussion. Pantherskin wants to have the last word always, regardless of what YOU say. He is not a party to these proceedings and came from the sidelines only to harass others. I did nothing wrong to begin with, and if ArbCom sees no reason to penalize me for EEML, I don’t need to be victimized by problem users during these proceedings either. In a way, your formal warning to me, but not to Pantherskin, tends to exonerate him in this instance. I am grateful for your patience. --Poeticbent talk 17:28, 21 November 2009 (UTC)