User talk:Luk

Click here to leave me a new message .
I will usually reply on your talk page if you sign your comments by typing ~~~~ at the end.

If you are here because you think I've made a mistake somewhere, you might be right.

If you can, please undo my action (even if it's a deletion or a block) and notify me, I'll double check later.

	Archives
2006 – 2007 – 2008 – 2009
2010 – 2011 – 2012 – 2013–2017
2018 – 2019 – 2020 – 2021

InkHeart question

Hey, I noticed that you blocked InkHeart indefinitely for having multiple accounts. I've been dealing with her/JKsarang/69dressings lately over OWN issues and such. Though looking at the sockpuppets User:Theoffice89 listed for her, he/she seems to have completely different editing interests, and I was wondering—if you don't mind me asking—how you came to that conclusion for the other numerous listed users. Thanks. Ωphois 19:57, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

On a related note, my thanks for dealing with this Belov/InkHeart/69dressings/et al issue. I've found another nine accounts which appear suspicious: in each case, the account was created between 19:01 and 19:11 yesterday, and each new user was welcomed by either 69dressings or Belov. During the same period, 69dressings sent a welcome message to Belov here. I don't know if that's sufficient evidence for a sockpuppet investigation (it's rather circumstantial, I admit), but given the number of socks already involved I do think there is reason for concern. PC78 (talk) 20:26, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

@Ophois: Yeah I screwed up on that check. I did it in a hurry and tried to do the investigation differently than usual. I apparently caught innocent people there, and I plan to redo the investigation from scratch as soon as I can (unfortunately, that's the first time I manage to be near a computer since Saturday -and I'm at work-). I shouldn't have done these blocks myself, and rest assured I plan to unblock and apologize to the people mistakenly blocked. -- Luk ^talk 09:49, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey. I believe that the IP user 72.11.138.103 may be Inkheart again. A few hours ago, the anon made four edits only to stuff Inkheart's sockpuppets use to edit, and followed Inkheart's MO of removing template tags. Ωphois 10:32, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Same with anon 66.199.237.22 Ωphois 12:11, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

I see Ryan blocked them both, I don't think there's much more to be done at this point. -- Luk ^talk 14:50, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Unblock request

Hello, I have been blocked by yourself. For some reason this IP adress has been stopped from logging WIkipedia due to vandalism from my IP adress. Since I sign in when rectifying something, I don't see why this is. If you could please unblock the a adress, I would appreciate it.

Ta very much

If you would like to discuss, please contact me on my account e-mail: (catholic14@gmail.com) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.68.65.172 (talk) 21:45, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Quick Seven (user recovery)

If you need access to a Wikipedia article that has been deleted, ask me. If it's not a copyright violation, libel, or personal information, and has not been deleted as a suspected biographies of living persons violation, I will userfy the article for you.

Note that using the text to recreate any deleted article may automatically qualify them for speedy deletion, and copies of previously deleted content that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion because Wikipedia is not a free web host. We have a list of alternative sites which may be used to host your content.

Subject Page: Quick Seven

Please recover my page, it was deleted and I'm having no luck in recovering it. I look forward to your response.

Thank you in advance,

-Larry (issue78)

Replied on this user's talk page - 10:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)