Wikipedia:Sandbox

Criticism

	+	
	+	

Margaret O'Brien has written “SNCC is not going to save the world. By suggesting it could, Zinn places SNCC's true greatness in a possible (but very doubtful) future; and he needn't have.”

	+	
	+	

In his review of Postwar America: 1945-1971, Peter Michelson writes that “the book suffers finally from political romanticism, the sort of wishful thinking that reveals the frustrating dilemma of American radicalism.”

	+	
	+	

Simon Lazarus, writes that Zinn romanticizes “the virtues of confrontation for its own sake”. [1]

	+	
	+	

"A People's History of the United States" has been scorned specifically; Luther Spoehr for example writes that Zinn's book “has no notion of process or complexity, no sense of how the terms of argument and weapons of battle have changed over time.” Saterday Review, 7 Feb 2, 1980 page 37

	+	
	+	

Michael Kammen finds "A People's History" to be “a synthesis of the radical and revisionist historiography of the past decade, incorporating many of the strengths and most of the weaknesses of that highly uneven body of literature.”

	+	
	+	

Bruce Kuklick, writes “its comprehension of issues is stunted; its understanding of materials is unnuanced”.

	+	
	+	

Terry M. Perlin contends Zinn's "peoples history" “suffers from considerable naiveté,” and concludes that it is “a utopian tract, suffering from all the beauties and dangers of that format.”

	+	
	+	

Mariel Garza accounts for the book's phenomenal sales with the observation “A People's History is a great example of product differentiation, entering underserved markets, and giving people what they want.” [2]