Jump to content

Talk:2010 Australian Open: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Joey80 (talk | contribs)
Line 12: Line 12:
The "Single Seeds" section follows form with several other grand slam pages. The "Seeded Players Status" seems to just be helpful while the tournament is going on. [[User:RiddleMe98|RiddleMe98]] ([[User talk:RiddleMe98|talk]]) 12:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
The "Single Seeds" section follows form with several other grand slam pages. The "Seeded Players Status" seems to just be helpful while the tournament is going on. [[User:RiddleMe98|RiddleMe98]] ([[User talk:RiddleMe98|talk]]) 12:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Remove, of course. Singles Seeds = Seeded player status. Remove infos from section "Singles Seeds" and change name "Seeded player status" to "Singles Seeds". Good solution. '''[[User:PL Alvarez|Alvarez]]'''. 27 Jan 10'.
::Remove, of course. Singles Seeds = Seeded player status. Remove infos from section "Singles Seeds" and change name "Seeded player status" to "Singles Seeds". Good solution. '''[[User:PL Alvarez|Alvarez]]'''. 27 Jan 10'.

== Singles Seeds w/ points table ==

I like this a lot. It shows you the performances of each of the seeds in terms of how they are reflected in their rankings. This is quite useful since for the two-week duration of a Grand Slam tournament, no update is done on the official rankings. So at least there's a way to track down how the rankings of the players rise and dip as the tournament progresses. One might also include a column for the prize money gained. Maybe this section can be included in succeeding Grand Slam tournaments. I'm not a fan of the color though, might be too strong for the eyes. [[User:Joey80|Joey80]] ([[User talk:Joey80|talk]]) 01:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:05, 29 January 2010

WikiProject iconTennis Unassessed Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Tennis To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Should there be mention of some of the violence associated with certain fans in this year's Open? It's all over the Aussie news. People throwing stink bombs, being ejected, arrested for setting off flares... I'm not sure whether previous years have had their fair share of troublemakers or not, but I feel this is notable. Thoughts? - tbone (talk) 07:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Resolved
 – After the idea of Alvarez

Should there be really two sections which cover exactly the same thing? These are the sections "Singles Seeds" and "Seeded players status". I think one of them should be removed. Armbrust (talk) 22:15, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If there's no objection, then i will remove the "Singles Seeds" section on 27 January. Armbrust (talk) 11:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Aaroncrick (talk) 11:11, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The "Single Seeds" section follows form with several other grand slam pages. The "Seeded Players Status" seems to just be helpful while the tournament is going on. RiddleMe98 (talk) 12:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Remove, of course. Singles Seeds = Seeded player status. Remove infos from section "Singles Seeds" and change name "Seeded player status" to "Singles Seeds". Good solution. Alvarez. 27 Jan 10'.

Singles Seeds w/ points table

I like this a lot. It shows you the performances of each of the seeds in terms of how they are reflected in their rankings. This is quite useful since for the two-week duration of a Grand Slam tournament, no update is done on the official rankings. So at least there's a way to track down how the rankings of the players rise and dip as the tournament progresses. One might also include a column for the prize money gained. Maybe this section can be included in succeeding Grand Slam tournaments. I'm not a fan of the color though, might be too strong for the eyes. Joey80 (talk) 01:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]