User talk:Nancy: Difference between revisions
Estrill5766 (talk | contribs) →Neolibertarianism: new section |
|||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
::Thanks I42. I've had a(nother) word with Hassaan on his talk page about ignoring consensus, explained the consequences etc. Will he ever learn? I see that the article has been redirected, quite right too! [[User:Nancy|<span style="font-family:Segoe Script;color:#FF6600;font-size:14px">Nancy</span>]][[User talk:Nancy|<span style="font-family:Segoe Script;font-size:14px"><sup> talk</sup></span>]] 17:22, 28 February 2010 (UTC) |
::Thanks I42. I've had a(nother) word with Hassaan on his talk page about ignoring consensus, explained the consequences etc. Will he ever learn? I see that the article has been redirected, quite right too! [[User:Nancy|<span style="font-family:Segoe Script;color:#FF6600;font-size:14px">Nancy</span>]][[User talk:Nancy|<span style="font-family:Segoe Script;font-size:14px"><sup> talk</sup></span>]] 17:22, 28 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::Thanks! I don't know if they'll ever Get It. I hope they do; properly directed, their enthusiasm should be an asset to the project. [[User:I42|I42]] ([[User talk:I42|talk]]) 17:28, 28 February 2010 (UTC) |
:::Thanks! I don't know if they'll ever Get It. I hope they do; properly directed, their enthusiasm should be an asset to the project. [[User:I42|I42]] ([[User talk:I42|talk]]) 17:28, 28 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Neolibertarianism == |
|||
I believe that the page Neolibertarianism should be recreated. There are pages for almost every other libertarian variant, but not this one. If you were to google the word Neolibertarian, you would find a vast amount of talk on the subject. The theory has been synthesized to a much greater extent lately. It is very similar to Libertarian Conservative, but there are enough differences to warrant its own page. There are even wikipedia pages with links to it, a dead page |
|||
--[[User:Estrill5766|Estrill5766]] ([[User talk:Estrill5766|talk]]) 00:44, 2 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:44, 2 March 2010
Welcome to my talk page
2007 · 01 · 2008 · 02 · 03 · 04 · 05 · 06 · 07 · 08 · 09 · 10 · 2009 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
- DID I DELETE YOUR PAGE? If so please check User:Nancy/Why? for an explanation first. If you are still none the wiser then please click here to leave me a message
- I will reply on this page as I prefer to keep conversations all in one place but may alert you on your talk page too so you get the nice orange bar.
- If I have written something on your talk page, I will be watching it so feel free to reply there if you wish. If you prefer to reply here that's fine too.
- Threads older than 7 days are archived automatically by MiszaBot
Contents
M18_recoilless_rifleHi Nancy. Could you please take a look at the pages M18_recoilless_rifle and M18_Recoilless_Rifle. The former seems to be a real page concerning the topic, where the later redirects to Recoilless rifle. There is also a link to the later on the M18 page. May I suggest the later is removed and the former renamed to the later's case? Oh, and sail is definitely better than power! Kind Regards LeeRyman (talk) 10:56, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Final discussion for Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living peopleHello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:
Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 02:03, 24 February 2010 (UTC) Could Do With Your InputHi Fellow Editor, Could you please have a look at this conversation, it seems to be going a little AWOL. I do not see where I haved mate a WP:Personal Attack and why User:Sinneed is warning me. If I am wrong then I willhold up my hand. --Sikh-History 08:57, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
CSD A7Why wouldn't CSD A7 apply to a martial art? Can't we look at it as an organization? If not, what is the appropriate CSD category? Niteshift36 (talk) 16:27, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Deletion declined?How is there meaningful content in Elur Pudupatti? If you don't delete it for not having any content, then delete it for lack of notability. A simple Google search does not yield very many results. I apologize if I posted this on the wrong talk page; I am still a relatively new user. -BLM Platinum (talk) 17:48, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Cookham BridgeTalkback![]() Message added 18:43, 25 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. iBen (talk) 18:43, 25 February 2010 (UTC) Deleted Nathaniel Bogdanove article.Dear Nancy, I see on the log that your reason for deleting my (short) bio on Nathaniel Bogdanove was because there was no historical significance. The first or second sentence pointed out that Mr. Bogdanove was the first person to be elected to the post of Mayor of Waldwick, NJ after he died. I respectfully disagree with your opinion that this is not historically significant and ask that you please restore it.
Respectfully,
Seth J. Bogdanove
Bogframe —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bogframe (talk • contribs) 20:43, 25 February 2010 (UTC) 17:18, 25 February 2010 Nancy (talk | contribs) deleted "Nathaniel Bogdanove" (Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject (CSD A7)) There is a mention of this fact in the trivia section of [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bogframe (talk • contribs) 20:55, 25 February 2010 (UTC) ThanksThanks for fixing my book: issues. I had it labeled correctly but it gave me an error message and so I followed the error messages steps to correct it...well if just messed it all up. A appreciate you straightening it all out for me! Sabiona (talk) 20:07, 26 February 2010 (UTC) Charlotte BeazleyHello, I was going to look up Charlotte Beazley but then I noticed she wasn't on wikipedia. She is an actress/singer/model. I was just wondering if you could make an article Charlotte Beazley and I can send you more information to write in because we know each other. Thanks and please make one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.131.191 (talk) 09:13, 27 February 2010 (UTC) AfD nomination of Monthly events, 2005![]() Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monthly events, 2005. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC) As you have dealt with him/her before regarding the creation of X Factor articles, could you have a word again? One "problematic" article was Olly Murs; Olly Murs (singer) has been created today. I would like to stand back from this rather than get into an edit war. Many thanks! I42 (talk) 15:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
NeolibertarianismI believe that the page Neolibertarianism should be recreated. There are pages for almost every other libertarian variant, but not this one. If you were to google the word Neolibertarian, you would find a vast amount of talk on the subject. The theory has been synthesized to a much greater extent lately. It is very similar to Libertarian Conservative, but there are enough differences to warrant its own page. There are even wikipedia pages with links to it, a dead page --Estrill5766 (talk) 00:44, 2 March 2010 (UTC) |