User talk:Sourside21: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
You have been blocked from editing. using TW |
Sourside21 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Dude, I happen to agree with you about the [[OnLive]] edit, it's uncited speculation. However, you are doing yourself no favours by failing to explain your reasons for the edit and continuously blanking your comments page. You have nothing to hide, and your edit makes sense. The issue is one of explanation and openness. Cheers [[User:MrMarmite|MrMarmite]] ([[User talk:MrMarmite|talk]]) 07:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
Dude, I happen to agree with you about the [[OnLive]] edit, it's uncited speculation. However, you are doing yourself no favours by failing to explain your reasons for the edit and continuously blanking your comments page. You have nothing to hide, and your edit makes sense. The issue is one of explanation and openness. Cheers [[User:MrMarmite|MrMarmite]] ([[User talk:MrMarmite|talk]]) 07:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
==Re== |
|||
For wrestling companies criticism would be better directed for business models and storylines, rather than them using mock combat as a means for entertainment. Criticism of mock combat are better suited for the main professional wrestling article, since WWE is one of hundreds of wrestling companies. Also, for an industry such as pro wrestling criticism is common and has played a role is several companies futures. Currently, the term fake is incorrect, since chair shots, tables and ladder spots, etc can not be faked. They are legit, though that may not have as much force behind them if it was an actual competitive sport. There are several instances when matches have non-scripted spots that are legit as they can be. Though your edits are under good faith, they are a bit biased so I'll perform one more undo if no one has already. It would be in your best interest to not revert and instead discuss, since you have already violated the 3RR.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 02:26, 12 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:No, fake is just the wrong term in general. The mainstream could say alot of things, doesn't mean they are accurate.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 03:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== February 2010 == |
|||
<div class="user-block"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 Hours''' for '''edit warring blocks escalate and there was no excuse for the disruption you caused.'''. Please stop. You are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make ''useful'' contributions]] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below. [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 14:26, 12 February 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 --> |
|||
Revision as of 03:58, 7 March 2010
OnLive
Dude, I happen to agree with you about the OnLive edit, it's uncited speculation. However, you are doing yourself no favours by failing to explain your reasons for the edit and continuously blanking your comments page. You have nothing to hide, and your edit makes sense. The issue is one of explanation and openness. Cheers MrMarmite (talk) 07:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)