Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comodo Internet Security: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:08, 8 March 2010

Comodo Internet Security

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete non-notable software. It's claim to fame seems to be two short reviews in PCWorld and PCMagazine. --Bejnar (talk) 21:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think that [PC Magazine review http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2333811,00.asp] is quite substantial, with 8 webpages. (Perhaps you only saw the overview?) Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 13:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 00:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It has a fair amount of users around...a couple million, according to a post I saw lately by the CEO on the forum. You think it needs more sources then? Or does someone need to write a long review about something for it to be in Wikipedia? --LaserWraith (talk) 02:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You got it. A couple of someones need to write substantial reviews about it, and publish the reviews in reliable publications (electronic or hard-copy doesn't matter, fact-checking does). That is a large part of what makes an encyclopedia different from the news or Internet blogs. --Bejnar (talk) 03:17, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here are two more reviews about CIS, and the new beta v. 4. Comodo Internet Security 4 Review, Comodo Internet Security Review.

Comment found a couple of short reviews in finnish magazine MikroBitti: [1][2] (preview, full article only for subscribers). Not sure if it is enough to show notability however; both mentions are on the magazines "monthly recommended free software" article.(edit: forgot signature MKFI (talk) 09:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]
Keep The PC Magazine and PCWorld reviews establish notability. (And I've added a "reviews" section to this article.) The article does need cleanup. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 13:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 *'''Keep:''' It has a fair amount of users around...a couple million, according to a post I saw lately by the CEO on the forum.  You think it needs more sources then?  Or does someone need to write a long review about something for it to be in Wikipedia? --[[User:Jeremysbost|LaserWraith]] ([[User talk:Jeremysbost|talk]]) 02:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 ::You got it. A couple of someones need to write substantial reviews about it, and publish the reviews in reliable publications (electronic or hard-copy doesn't matter, fact-checking does). That is a large part of what makes an encyclopedia different from the news or Internet blogs. --[[User:Bejnar|Bejnar]] ([[User talk:Bejnar|talk]]) 03:17, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
+:::Here are two more reviews about CIS, and the new beta v. 4. [http://www.brighthub.com/computing/smb-security/reviews/61682.aspx Comodo Internet Security 4 Review], [http://www.brighthub.com/computing/smb-security/reviews/31876.aspx Comodo Internet Security Review].
 *'''Comment''' found a couple of short reviews in finnish magazine MikroBitti: [http://www.mbnet.fi/lukusali/juttu.aspx?juttuid=3678][http://www.mbnet.fi/lukusali/juttu.aspx?juttuid=3043] (preview, full article only for subscribers). Not sure if it is enough to show notability however; both mentions are on the magazines "monthly recommended free software" article.(edit: forgot signature [[User:MKFI|MKFI]] ([[User talk:MKFI|talk]]) 09:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC))
 *'''Keep''' The PC Magazine and PCWorld reviews establish notability. (And I've added a "reviews" section to this article.) The article does need cleanup. [[User:Jodi.a.schneider|Jodi.a.schneider]] ([[User talk:Jodi.a.schneider|talk]]) 13:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)