Talk:Gene Simmons Family Jewels: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:41, 29 March 2010

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Episode articles

I can appreciate the work that is being put into this subject, but I don't think there is justification at this point for individual articles on every single episode. I recommend that the majority of episodes be summarized here on the main show page, and then any episodes that become particular notable (meaning that they are the specific subject of outside press) can be broken out individually. Right now though we seem to have several episode articles that are nothing more than a couple sentences of show synopsis. --El on ka 22:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is the point in making a subject shorter? Moezzillas world 23:20, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consolidation. Improving signal-to-noise ratio. Freqsh0 (talk) 03:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gene simmons family jewels logo.jpg

Image:Gene simmons family jewels logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Newborn daughter Nina?

I know Wikipedia editing is supposeed to be civil, but cut the crap. Whoever put this trash on here is full of it. Consider it deleted. 209.254.200.110 (talk) 21:41, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 09:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
+== Newborn daughter Nina? ==
+I know Wikipedia editing is supposeed to be civil, but cut the crap.  Whoever put this trash on here is full of it.  Consider it deleted. [[Special:Contributions/209.254.200.110|209.254.200.110]] ([[User talk:209.254.200.110|talk]]) 21:41, 29 March 2010 (UTC)