User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive018

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = => CAUTION: This page may contain SATIRE posing as data. <= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Your proposition may be good But let's have one thing understood Whatever it is, I'm against it! And even when you've changed it or condensed it I'm against it! --Groucho Marx in Horse Feathers [1]

Ark-Hives
User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive001 User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive002 User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive003 User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive004 User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive005 User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive006 User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive007 User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive008 User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive009 User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive010

de bait

This digression has been archived. Please do not muddify it.
This section... intentionally left Blanc.

Train boarding on track five for Anaheim, Azuza, and Cuc...

sniff

this mean anything to you? tedder (talk) 01:47, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm not familiar with it, but it's quite nice. :) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 02:51, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

That's not what I meant. More like WP:DUCK. tedder (talk) 03:54, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

I am just totally dense at the moment. You might want to send me a quick e-mail. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 06:25, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Interesting

Our recently departed friend, for someone who just started editing just over two months ago, had an interesting knowledge of Wikipedia - apparently enough to know how to track user contributions, perform rollbacks, sign posts without the "user" prefix and now apparently also knowledge of the "retired" symbol for the user page - I guess that is possible for eight weeks of editing, but I think it a bit strange. At this point I am seriously wondering if we are dealing with someone who has been here before. In any event, I've requested a block on the account. -OberRanks (talk) 13:24, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

His approach reminds me of a number of "highly-focused" editors in the past, but not any particular one of them. He might be a sock, but his excessive behavior just under this username is sufficient to draw scrutiny just for itself. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 13:29, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

IP edits

88.108.16.87 edited at times between those of 88.111.63.26 so it's virtually impossible that they are the same person, IP address don't get re-assigned that quickly. --88.111.37.206 (talk) 17:09, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Roger. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 17:15, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Why you accuse?

Why you accuse me of this? I always edit respectfully. You have no call for that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JSimmonz (talk • contribs) 18:38, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Your actions speak for themselves. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 18:43, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Him not bad person. Me think you silly poop head. You bad man. Rabbit. Thing. Bah. HalfShadow 18:55, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

What action? Just because I side on Collins? Steve is rude editor. And Collins have picture. Why you guys at Wikapedia not like Collins? You harrass him! Steve say: "I come here to do work Americans cant do". I watch him well. Collins is get bad rap man. He doesn't want to be the editor, just fair article. And there was consensus until this Steve creep.JSimmonz (talk) 19:06, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Urrf. Unga-bunga. HalfShadow 19:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Look at picture in link to collins site, picture. Why steve say "would be". Steve is annoying man.JSimmonz (talk) 19:41, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Mk5384

I said nothing about disruption. I stated clearly why both names belong. I also suggested mediation. Your case does not hold water. You are, of course, free to report me. I wish you the best.Mk5384 (talk) 14:14, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

• Bugs, if I wasn't half-asleep right now, I'd say that that was a challenge to ya. And after reading through his contribution history, my nose says that he smell of WP:CPUSH and WP:POINT. My reaction now would be to WP:DFTT and WP:DENY. Really no point talking to someone who's hell-bent on being a troll (versus someone who actually lives under a bridge) and as well as being a disruptive editor. All of which, have been summarised very clearly in WP:OWB. -- (carrots?) Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 15:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

I've voiced my concerns as well on the talk page of the article. Mk states he will continuously insert his material again and again regardless of what is stated or agreed upon at the talk page. The thing to do is have several users revert it and then report for what obviously will quickly become WP:3RR. I'm still also very suspicious of the amount of knowledge this user has of Wikipedia policies and procedures with "only" 8-12 weeks of editing. But, that is not something I can prove so its best left alone. -OberRanks (talk) 16:14, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia is doomed, what an awful waste of productive editors time. Off2riorob (talk) 16:34, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

FYI, the above thread was reported as a "conspiracy" and "canvassing" in this thread. A think the user in question was at last blocked. -OberRanks (talk) 19:16, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Followed by this edit no less. Amazing. -OberRanks (talk) 19:28, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

• Guys, read point number 26 & 44 of WP:OWB because MK is fast turning into one right now. No prize for guessing where his road will eventually lead to, eh? Like I said before, let's just ignore him and continue with our constructive contribution to Wikipedia. Personally, I subscribe to WP:DGAF when dealing with this kind of disruptive editor. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 19:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Elvis Presley

Hello, I've opened a discussion on Elvis Presley's talk page over the use of the word musician. OED defines it as: One skilled in music, especially in playing an instrument; hence my objection to the description of him as a musician rather than singer.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:56, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

I'll take a look. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 21:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Duke53

Generally the problem is, he is keeping a picture of Mormon temple undergarments on his userpage for the prime reason of making a mockery out of them, we mormons view the concept of them as quite sacred and generally I find it offensive, and its a big siren to his attitude towards mormons here on wikipedia. Ok maybe I shouldn't touch his page myself, but what should I do? Routerone (talk) 21:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Indeed, problem? Routerone (talk) 21:50, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

...considering you're part of a religion that has their own underwear (and nice bulge on the guy's set; nothing like optimism, is there?), I'm not going to comment any further. HalfShadow 21:52, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

No, they are used only when members attend a temple. There is an article on the subject Temple garment. Routerone (talk) 21:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

You're part of a religion that has their own underwear. I swear, I didn't think Mormons could get any funnier. HalfShadow 21:56, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

• HS, I concur. Never knew that religion could get so kinky... except for the Kama Sutra by the Hindus, eh? --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 07:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

F-Unit Article

Did you not see talk in article? I find Authority Buckley scientist that lead to consensus in 2008? You said that what you want, what problem now? JSimmonz (talk) 07:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Copy edits

I was wondering if you could weigh in on an unrelated article.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 08:00, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

YOU CHEAT AT F-UNITS!

Another one bites the dust~! --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 09:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Or this:[2] ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 10:13, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Resolved

Oh look here! I wake up after winning consensus at night and see you have blocked then vote again after we win! You vote four times you cheat! Collins right this place is cheat! You cheat at baseball too? Go pray for you sins bad man!JSimmonz (talk) 04:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Text removal from John Pershing Talk Page

Since you also made comments on this thread, please be aware of this. The text was archived, so I guess that's okay, but I don't really see why it was so important to "purge" these comments from the talk page at this point nor do I understand the strong feelings of the user who removed them. MK needs no defending or advocates right now, as we have seen. I don't plan to make an issue of this, but wanted to alert you since your comments were also involved. -OberRanks (talk) 15:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

[3].--Mbz1 (talk) 03:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

After reading about that one guy, I thought it needed to be said. That doesn't necessarily justify extreme BLP violations. But it's a worthwhile point. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 06:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

strangely appropriate

[4]. tedder (talk) 04:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Right! Looks like one of those Stephen Colbert "on notice" signs. Or like Harvey Korman reading the list of folks he wants for the raid on Rock Ridge: "...mugs, pugs, thugs... ... and Methodists!" ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 06:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Saturn-esque

[5] since I agreed not to edit war over that particular incident...thank you. O Fenian (talk) 17:51, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

WP Baseball in the Signpost

WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Baseball for a Signpost article to be published April 5. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, feel free to share this with them. -Mabeenot (talk) 02:07, 1 April 2010 (UTC)