Jump to content

Talk:Gabourey Sidibe: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


why are people allowed to type on this? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/96.227.25.43|96.227.25.43]] ([[User talk:96.227.25.43|talk]]) 21:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
why are people allowed to type on this? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/96.227.25.43|96.227.25.43]] ([[User talk:96.227.25.43|talk]]) 21:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

A more flattering picture? Is that even possible?
[[Special:Contributions/72.226.78.94|72.226.78.94]] ([[User talk:72.226.78.94|talk]]) 19:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)


== omgh!!!! ==
== omgh!!!! ==

Revision as of 19:48, 11 April 2010

WikiProject iconBiography: Actors and Filmmakers Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

what the hell

dude can you at least put a more flattering picture!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.47.226.166 (talk) 03:37, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- might be!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.183.72 (talk) 20:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] 


why are people allowed to type on this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.227.25.43 (talk) 21:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A more flattering picture? Is that even possible? 72.226.78.94 (talk) 19:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

omgh!!!!

put a new dam picture —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.47.239.238 (talk) 01:34, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Obesity issue

Her obvious and dangerous weight problem should be in the article. She has an obvious food addiction. Discuss. 173.171.70.190 (talk) 07:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If the she addresses or acknowledges it, then it should be mentioned, but I don't think it's relevant to her article, however, Howard Stern's comment on it MIGHT be notable in the controversy it has caused. --Hourick (talk) 19:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's really not appropriate to describe her first as "morbidly obese" before describing her as an actress. She has a page because of the acting, not the obesity. I removed such a reference, and I think the jury's still out on where (if anywhere) is the best place to reinsert that phrase. -Morris —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.11.113.77 (talk) 01:48, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Edit request

{{editsemiprotected}}

I want to fix the red links because it's distracting and take out the comment of Jimmy Kimmel saying "Are you insane?" because he never said that in the whole interview and I feel like the person who wrote that is sabotaging Gabourey Sidibe. Theatheistgerm (talk) 04:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a reliable source for the interview change. I am only removing one redlink, because it is duplicated, but leaving the other because someone may see it and decide to write an article about it.  fetchcomms 04:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There isn't a reliable source that he did say it, why is it required to prove a negative to get it removed? Alucinor (talk) 21:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

=Wow

She is quite a good actor to for that debut I'm interested in hearing about new movies she's in but I can't find info on them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.99.4.228 (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Request

Can someone please either remove the "The Big C" link or change it to a redlink - It's referencing a TV Show but is currently pointing to the concrete installation at UC Berkeley, which is incredibly unrelated. My account is too new to accomplish this. Thanks. Etcee (talk) 05:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.14.67.79 (talk) 04:48, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]