User talk:Mydomainwiki100

April 2010

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pilif12p 13:07, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Baloo Web

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Baloo Web requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hqb (talk) 13:08, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:12, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Baloo Web. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Egmontaz♤ ^talk 13:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: User talk:Hqb#Sorry!

Don't worry about it. But you are confusing two things: It is true that you should never delete the "speedy deletion" tags on new Wikipedia pages that you have created yourself. But t's OK to remove the notifications (on this Talk page) that a page of yours has been marked for speedy deletion, once you've read the notice. Keep in mind though, that anyone can still see the full set of messages on your talk page (including messages that you've deleted) through the "history" tab at the top. Hqb (talk) 13:23, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

You can delete anything you want from your own Talk page, if you want (though it's preferable to archive it). Just be aware that it's never truly gone; so if you should persist in violating Wikipedia policies and guidelines, while just erasing the ensuing warnings on your talk page, you will quickly get blocked anyway. Hqb (talk) 13:43, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

On the other hand, attempting to impersonate other editors, like you did here, definitely puts you on the fast path to getting blocked. Cut it out. Hqb (talk) 14:10, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Mydomainwiki100. You have new messages at Pilif12p's talk page.
Message added 13:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Pilif12p 13:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Not going to add another talkback. Answered your other question (See my talk page.) Pilif12p 13:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Question answered

Just letting you know that I answered your question Wikipedia talk:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Elockid ^(Talk) 13:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Look at WP:Your first article for good advice about contributing. JohnCD (talk) 13:42, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Mydomainwiki100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

99.165.226.147 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Pilif21". The reason given for Pilif21's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

• Blocking administrator: Elockid (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

I have blocked you three days for sockpuppetry as well as inappropriate warnings to users' pages. The fact that an account I blocked Pilif21 (talk · contribs) (which looks to be an impersonation of Pilif12p (talk · contribs) being a vandalism only account also effected you (autoblock), your most recent edits essentially matched those of Pilif21 (vandalism warnings basically), the editing times between the IP, Pilif21 and you makes to believe that this is likely you. You may contest this block of course by adding the template {{unblock|Your reason here}} . Elockid ^(Talk) 15:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello , this is mydomainwiki100

You must not understand. I am at my cousin's house today where the IP adress is different then mine. I've told my cousin about Wikipedia and I saw him on a account as something like Philip 21? Thanks. I AM NOT A SPAMMER

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mydomainwiki100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was at a different house

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was at a '''different house''' |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was at a '''different house''' |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was at a '''different house''' |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}