Talk:Cottage Life (TV channel): Difference between revisions
start class |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Looking at both this article and the [[CBC-2]], I see some similarities in there. So could Bold be seen as a successor of the failed CBC-2 project? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:DanCBJMS|DanCBJMS]] ([[User talk:DanCBJMS|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DanCBJMS|contribs]]) 22:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Looking at both this article and the [[CBC-2]], I see some similarities in there. So could Bold be seen as a successor of the failed CBC-2 project? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:DanCBJMS|DanCBJMS]] ([[User talk:DanCBJMS|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DanCBJMS|contribs]]) 22:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
::Probably not. While the CBC-2 proposal may have had some vague similarities with the network that eventually became "Bold", the world of Canadian television changed radically between 1980 (when CBC-2 was proposed) and 2000 (when Land and Sea was licensed). Unless one could find a reliable source that states otherwise, I don't think there is much of a connection between the two networks. Given the lengthy time period between the two, and the fact that the broadcast field was extremely different by the time Country Canada went on the air, means that it would be a real stretch to suggest that Bold is a successor to CBC-2. --[[User:Skeezix1000|Skeezix1000]] ([[User talk:Skeezix1000|talk]]) 20:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC) |
::Probably not. While the CBC-2 proposal may have had some vague similarities with the network that eventually became "Bold", the world of Canadian television changed radically between 1980 (when CBC-2 was proposed) and 2000 (when Land and Sea was licensed). Unless one could find a reliable source that states otherwise, I don't think there is much of a connection between the two networks. Given the lengthy time period between the two, and the fact that the broadcast field was extremely different by the time Country Canada went on the air, means that it would be a real stretch to suggest that Bold is a successor to CBC-2. --[[User:Skeezix1000|Skeezix1000]] ([[User talk:Skeezix1000|talk]]) 20:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
== CRTC DENIES CBC application to rebrand as Bold, makes them go BACK to Country Canada == |
|||
Released on April 14, 2010: |
|||
http://www.viewers.ca/discuss/showthread.php?p=30702&posted=1#post30702 |
|||
The CRTC took it upon themselves to refile an amendment *forcing* CBC to carry the type of programming it was *licensed* to do. The fact it took the government watchdog THIS long to do it, I don't know. |
|||
[[User:Macshill|Macshill]] ([[User talk:Macshill|talk]]) 09:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:47, 15 April 2010
 | Canada: Television Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Untitled
In my opinion this page an inaccurate description of the channel. According to the CBC Country Canada *web site, it describes itself as being "...Canada's digital home for celebrating this country. Our land. Our people. Our regions and our passions."
In my opinion this is a much better description of the channel rather then being described as a channel devoted to "country living". Maybe the channel in its article should be described as a channel for "celebrating Canada, its land, people and its regions with a rural theme"?
Any thoughts on this would be appreciated so the article can better reflect the channel its on. --Cdn_boi--
Logo
Looking for the old logo while under the name of "Country Canada" to add to the article.
Bold a successor of CBC-2?
Looking at both this article and the CBC-2, I see some similarities in there. So could Bold be seen as a successor of the failed CBC-2 project? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanCBJMS (talk • contribs) 22:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Probably not. While the CBC-2 proposal may have had some vague similarities with the network that eventually became "Bold", the world of Canadian television changed radically between 1980 (when CBC-2 was proposed) and 2000 (when Land and Sea was licensed). Unless one could find a reliable source that states otherwise, I don't think there is much of a connection between the two networks. Given the lengthy time period between the two, and the fact that the broadcast field was extremely different by the time Country Canada went on the air, means that it would be a real stretch to suggest that Bold is a successor to CBC-2. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
CRTC DENIES CBC application to rebrand as Bold, makes them go BACK to Country Canada
Released on April 14, 2010:
http://www.viewers.ca/discuss/showthread.php?p=30702&posted=1#post30702
The CRTC took it upon themselves to refile an amendment *forcing* CBC to carry the type of programming it was *licensed* to do. The fact it took the government watchdog THIS long to do it, I don't know.