Jump to content

Talk:Buttocks: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 68.125.22.24 (talk) to last version by SineBot
Line 23: Line 23:


::: It works for me. Several times a day. [[Special:Contributions/12.186.37.41|12.186.37.41]] ([[User talk:12.186.37.41|talk]]) 00:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
::: It works for me. Several times a day. [[Special:Contributions/12.186.37.41|12.186.37.41]] ([[User talk:12.186.37.41|talk]]) 00:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
:::: I agree completely with ([[User:118.90.90.78]]). It was the first thing that came to mind when the page loaded. Male buttock takes the objective view, female the fashion magazine take on it, lit up and indeed suggestive. However, I'm not going to search the web for female buttocks that would be better suited... --[[Special:Contributions/83.248.83.119|83.248.83.119]] ([[User talk:83.248.83.119|talk]]) 12:18, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
:It is perfect. Should be featured as image of the day. -- [[Special:Contributions/200.234.107.35|200.234.107.35]] ([[User talk:200.234.107.35|talk]]) 07:54, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
:It is perfect. Should be featured as image of the day. -- [[Special:Contributions/200.234.107.35|200.234.107.35]] ([[User talk:200.234.107.35|talk]]) 07:54, 30 May 2009 (UTC)



Revision as of 12:18, 30 April 2010

Female human buttocks image

Does anyone else find this image overly suggestive? I mean, the woman is bent over, for goodness' sake! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.90.90.78 (talk) 23:40, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So is the babboon!! --OhNoPeedyPeebles (talk) 20:09, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It works for me. Several times a day. 12.186.37.41 (talk) 00:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree completely with (User:118.90.90.78). It was the first thing that came to mind when the page loaded. Male buttock takes the objective view, female the fashion magazine take on it, lit up and indeed suggestive. However, I'm not going to search the web for female buttocks that would be better suited... --83.248.83.119 (talk) 12:18, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is perfect. Should be featured as image of the day. -- 200.234.107.35 (talk) 07:54, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I concur Image of the Day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.58.61.74 (talk) 08:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Irony

The most ironic thing about life is that one cannot see one's own arse, so how can you be sure it even exists! O.o —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.242.166.86 (talk) 21:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Calliope

Calliope (calli-/καλλι- beautiful + ωπή/ope hole, more specifically eye) means "one with beautiful eyes". Please correct. – 91.132.152.64 (talk) 22:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hiney?

Redirects here, but is not included in the list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.83.72.162 (talk) 20:41, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Do we really need a baboon picture?

Seriously, why? --Jackass2009 (talk) 21:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is the scientic name for a genetic big butt? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eupeyd (talkcontribs) 21:36, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steatopygia.

"females tend to have wider and thicker buttocks due to higher subcutaneous fat and wider hips."

I'm pretty sure this is supposed to be proportionally. i.e. Males' buttocks, on average, are absolutely wider and thicker than females' buttocks, whereas females' buttocks, on average, are wider and thicker in proportion to the rest of their body than is the case in males. This is a scientifically proven fact. The portion above should read "females tend to have proportionally wider and thicker buttocks due to higher subcutaneous fat and wider hips". I cannot edit it because the article is locked. --82.31.164.172 (talk) 07:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Buttocks

The definition is Kailem Wilson. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.194.130.161 (talk) 00:04, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not the Best Picture

    I belive that the current female buttocks picture is not a great one.  If we have a picture up there it should be of a quintessential female butt.  This is not the most educational one either, because it shows a more (I hate to say not normal) not normal butt.  We should have a picture of an every day butt that belongs to someone who is in the middle of their life and is not saggy and not round like this one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Star2buk (talkcontribs) 06:25, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] 

Use in Sex

I think there should be a topic about the Buttocks use in Anal Sex —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.215.28.165 (talk) 03:42, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

{{editsemiprotected}} Please replace File:Backtowel2.jpg with File:Female butt 66.jpg. It doesn't have a towel. 24.180.173.157 (talk) 15:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss first to see if there is consensus for this. --JokerXtreme (talk) 16:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see no compelling reason to change it; the other pic is not very sharp focus.  Chzz  ►  16:10, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]