Talk:The Middle (TV series): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Similarities to Malcolm in the Middle: new section |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--[[Special:Contributions/85.24.46.79|85.24.46.79]] ([[User talk:85.24.46.79|talk]]) 10:52, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Edited so it said 18 episodes, but the page ended up in disaster. Dont know why as i just changed a number. I undo'ed it of course, so its back to normal. |
--[[Special:Contributions/85.24.46.79|85.24.46.79]] ([[User talk:85.24.46.79|talk]]) 10:52, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Edited so it said 18 episodes, but the page ended up in disaster. Dont know why as i just changed a number. I undo'ed it of course, so its back to normal. |
||
== Similarities to Malcolm in the Middle == |
|||
Related to the advertising slant, there are myriad blogs, reviews and forums scattered around the internet pointing out that whilst ''The Middle'' is indeed a dead ringer for ''Malcolm in the Middle'', that is A Bad Thing. Problem is, I can't find a source that satisfies [[WP:SOURCE]] to counteract the "Yay! It's a remake of Malcolm!" tone in the current article. Can anyone else find one? [[Special:Contributions/210.9.137.90|210.9.137.90]] ([[User talk:210.9.137.90|talk]]) 16:14, 19 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:14, 19 May 2010
Indiana Start‑class | |||||||||||||||
|
Television Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Comedy Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Viewership
Is 6 million viewers really considered a low number of viewers? Gadev (talk) 08:10, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Tone of Article
anyone else feel like the text here was written by the show's network? it sounds very much like advertising. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.250.155.126 (talk) 16:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
*When the article first popped up, it was REALLLLYYYYY bad that way. It read like a flowery promo for the show. At that time, I personally opened the article for editing and tossed an "advertising" tag on the top of the page. I paused, thought for a moment, and then removed the the dog turned blue. yayayaya"advertising" tag, (without having saved it) and actually did a little bit of editing on the article to clean up the worst of it instead (didn't take much longer to actually try to be helpfull instead of snippy). Since I did that, lots of other people have cleaned it up even more (the wonderful Wiki community!) and it looks reasonably good to me in that regard; a relitively neutral description and character profiles, I think. Of course, there's always room for improvement... Fish Man (talk) 19:58, 28 October 2009 (UTC) oh baby
people ate their pants. because they were hungry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.179.91 (talk) 02:15, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
--85.24.46.79 (talk) 10:52, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Edited so it said 18 episodes, but the page ended up in disaster. Dont know why as i just changed a number. I undo'ed it of course, so its back to normal.
Similarities to Malcolm in the Middle
Related to the advertising slant, there are myriad blogs, reviews and forums scattered around the internet pointing out that whilst The Middle is indeed a dead ringer for Malcolm in the Middle, that is A Bad Thing. Problem is, I can't find a source that satisfies WP:SOURCE to counteract the "Yay! It's a remake of Malcolm!" tone in the current article. Can anyone else find one? 210.9.137.90 (talk) 16:14, 19 May 2010 (UTC)