Jump to content

User talk:Kabuli: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Srinagar: talkback
Kabuli (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 47: Line 47:
== Srinagar ==
== Srinagar ==
This is in regard to the edit summary you provided for your latest edit to the article [[ List of largest peaceful gatherings in history‎]]. You talked about a universally approved consensus; but why does the article [[Muzaffarabad]] say it is in Pakistan. Articles of ther cities in [[POK]] also state that they are in Pakistan. Then, why can't it be said that Srinagar is in India. Rgs '''[[User:Arjun024|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:14px">Arjun</span>]]'''[[User talk:Arjun024|<span style="font-family:Lucida Console;font-size:14px"><sup>codename'''024'''</sup></span>]] 18:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
This is in regard to the edit summary you provided for your latest edit to the article [[ List of largest peaceful gatherings in history‎]]. You talked about a universally approved consensus; but why does the article [[Muzaffarabad]] say it is in Pakistan. Articles of ther cities in [[POK]] also state that they are in Pakistan. Then, why can't it be said that Srinagar is in India. Rgs '''[[User:Arjun024|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:14px">Arjun</span>]]'''[[User talk:Arjun024|<span style="font-family:Lucida Console;font-size:14px"><sup>codename'''024'''</sup></span>]] 18:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
{{Talkback|Arjun024|Re: Srinagar}}10:11, 29 May 2010 (UTC)


== POV tagging ==
== POV tagging ==

Revision as of 22:31, 29 May 2010

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Kabuli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Oore (talk) 23:35, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kunan Poshpora incident

Updated DYK query On 20 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kunan Poshpora incident, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 18:07, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kashmir conflict

sorry about removing the paragraph regarding incidents in kashmir conflict page its valid i got confused sorry again Algebraic123 (talk) 17:33, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Chattisinghpora, Pathribal, and Barakpora massacres

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chattisinghpora, Pathribal, and Barakpora massacres, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

POVfork of Chittisinghpura massacre

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. vi5in[talk] 03:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chattisinghpora, Pathribal, and Barakpora massacres

I have nominated Chattisinghpora, Pathribal, and Barakpora massacres, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chattisinghpora, Pathribal, and Barakpora massacres. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. vi5in[talk] 21:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait for the results of the AfD before merging. --vi5in[talk] 21:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

See WP:SOAPBOX and WP:COATRACK. I really wouldn't bring up the issue of objectivity. You'll notice that I only put one article up for AfD. The other articles definitely have basis in fact and can be salvaged. But they're not that well-written and are definitely written from a subjective point of view. --vi5in[talk] 21:21, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I'm sorry about the Gawakadal article. I mixed up the edit between two tabs I had open on my browser. My mistake. I'll go ahead and revert myself. --vi5in[talk] 21:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Took a look at it. Appropriately tagged. I'm not a huge fan of these "massacre" articles. They're just propaganda. --vi5in[talk] 22:19, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Srinagar

This is in regard to the edit summary you provided for your latest edit to the article List of largest peaceful gatherings in history‎. You talked about a universally approved consensus; but why does the article Muzaffarabad say it is in Pakistan. Articles of ther cities in POK also state that they are in Pakistan. Then, why can't it be said that Srinagar is in India. Rgs Arjuncodename024 18:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV tagging

I don't have an objection to your edits per se as they seem to be well written and sourced. Also, you don't have to convince me that the Indian government is entirely objective and blameless on the Kashmir issue however, I feel that the article I tagged did have a certain POV towards it. I don't however tag every article as having a POV just because the Indian Army or paramilitary forces were accused of partaking in a massacre and am not particularly pleased that you accuse me of this. I would appreciate if you give me the time to review the claims in the article before removing the POV-tag. If you believe that I am intent on covering up India's actions in Kashmir, then you are wrong as I believe this goes against the goals of Wikipedia. I would also like to direct you to this edit I made in case you think I am biased towards a particular side (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Department_of_Police,_Delhi&diff=prev&oldid=361562267). I guess it's fortunate that living in a democracy empowers people with the knowledge that no government is blameless in such incidents. Vedant (talk) 02:45, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]