User talk:UnknownThing

Welcome!

Hello, UnknownThing, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 21:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Friendly reminder

Just to let you know that the article Value Driven Transcendence (whose only content was "This page is currently under construction") should have been tagged with {{db-a3}} (no content) rather than {{db-g2}} (test pages). Cheers, Waldir ^talk 07:52, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Ah OK, still learning some stuff but thanks anyway :). UnknownThing (talk) 08:50, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

If you're going to do New Page Patrol (which is a good and useful thing to do) it's worth reading WP:CSD carefully; also, there is good advice from an experienced admin at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 09:45, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

MediaNet

Just to let you know that I removed your speedy deletion template from this page since you marked it as A7 (no assertion of notability), but the article claims that the company is the "leading cable provider" in a large region, so there is an assertion of notability. I would recommend taking this to AfD if you feel that it does not meet wikipedia's notability requirements. Another idea is to mark it for speedy deletion under G11 as an advertisement, as at best it does not comply with WP:Neutrality. Thanks. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 19:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

I took a better look at the article and marked it for speedy deletion as an advertisement (under G11). Thanks for patrolling this new page, but please be careful to make sure that the page meets the CSD under which you are nominating it in future, as nominating an article under an incorrect criterion may result in the page being kept, and nominating an article inappropriately may be misinterpreted as an attack by the creator of the article. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 19:31, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for correcting me :). I proberbly tagged it wrong due to there being no references. UnknownThing (talk) 19:37, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Not vandalism?

Hello. Why did you revert my report at the vandal page? This edit is vandalism if you look at what's happening. Mister Flash (talk) 21:12, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

The user who reverted you at first is an admin so I just went by what he thought. I don't know much about who you reported so I do apologise if I have made a mistake but as I'm new here, I just followed the leader. UnknownThing (talk) 21:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

No problem. I've asked the admin to look at it again. Thanks. Mister Flash (talk) 21:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC)