Talk:Areni-1 shoe: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
This is currently 'in the news' on the main page, here it states that it was 'discovered' recently. In actual fact it was fiscovered two years ago, the reports were just published recently. This is a little misleading. |
This is currently 'in the news' on the main page, here it states that it was 'discovered' recently. In actual fact it was fiscovered two years ago, the reports were just published recently. This is a little misleading. |
||
:Actually, here, the article points out that it was discovered in 2008 and not with the report's publication. --[[User:Davo88|Davo88]] ([[User talk:Davo88|talk]]) 12:36, 13 June 2010 (UTC) |
:Actually, here, the article points out that it was discovered in 2008 and not with the report's publication. --[[User:Davo88|Davo88]] ([[User talk:Davo88|talk]]) 12:36, 13 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
==right or left== |
|||
Now, is it a right or left shoe? Looks right to me... |
Revision as of 15:32, 13 June 2010
Archaeology Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Armenia Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
A news item involving Areni-1 shoe was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 11 June 2010. |
Title inappropriate
The title of this article is inapropriate. Armenians didn't exist at the time the show was made, and the title is not used by secondary sources. The name is not a natural search term. I suggest Areni-1 shoe. Abductive (reasoning) 20:34, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
We don't know whether Armenians existed then or not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.214.179.29 (talk) 12:45, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- I've considered Areni-1 shoe as well, but I think it's an even more unnatural search term than Armenian shoe. --Davo88 (talk) 03:05, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Armenian shoe would remain as a redirect. Abductive (reasoning) 05:59, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- I also think the title "Armenian shoe" is a bit odd - it suggests that there's only this one shoe in the entire country. I've moved the article to Areni-1 shoe, since the artefact is probably associated more with the location than with the whole country (compare Neanderthal). Sandstein 20:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Areni-1 shoe is indeed more specific to the cave where it was found. Thanks for making the move. It is also good to see that the Areni-1 shoe was mentioned on Wikipedia's main page in the news. :)--Davo88 (talk) 22:22, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- I also think the title "Armenian shoe" is a bit odd - it suggests that there's only this one shoe in the entire country. I've moved the article to Areni-1 shoe, since the artefact is probably associated more with the location than with the whole country (compare Neanderthal). Sandstein 20:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Armenian shoe would remain as a redirect. Abductive (reasoning) 05:59, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Innapropriate news headline
This is currently 'in the news' on the main page, here it states that it was 'discovered' recently. In actual fact it was fiscovered two years ago, the reports were just published recently. This is a little misleading.
- Actually, here, the article points out that it was discovered in 2008 and not with the report's publication. --Davo88 (talk) 12:36, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
right or left
Now, is it a right or left shoe? Looks right to me...