Jump to content

User talk:Utcursch/archive/30: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Thanks and All the best Mr Admin :)
Line 490: Line 490:
::Please see [[WP:NOR]]. Linking a bunch of incidents in India (like Babri Masjid, Christian conflicts etc.) to alleged [[Saffron terror]] without attributable sources is a massive violation of several wp policies. Furthermore, wikipedia is not about "[[WP:TRUTH|The truth]]", it's about [[WP:V|verifiability]].[[Special:Contributions/117.194.198.217|117.194.198.217]] ([[User talk:117.194.198.217|talk]]) 07:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
::Please see [[WP:NOR]]. Linking a bunch of incidents in India (like Babri Masjid, Christian conflicts etc.) to alleged [[Saffron terror]] without attributable sources is a massive violation of several wp policies. Furthermore, wikipedia is not about "[[WP:TRUTH|The truth]]", it's about [[WP:V|verifiability]].[[Special:Contributions/117.194.198.217|117.194.198.217]] ([[User talk:117.194.198.217|talk]]) 07:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
:I have raised the issue at [[Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Saffron_Terror]].[[Special:Contributions/117.194.198.217|117.194.198.217]] ([[User talk:117.194.198.217|talk]]) 07:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
:I have raised the issue at [[Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Saffron_Terror]].[[Special:Contributions/117.194.198.217|117.194.198.217]] ([[User talk:117.194.198.217|talk]]) 07:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
:*Thanks Mr Administrator, since you have started looking into this article now so I hope you will be able to save whatever comply with wiki policies. All the best --[[User:DawnOfTheBlood|DawnOfTheBlood]] ([[User talk:DawnOfTheBlood|talk]]) 08:41, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:41, 22 June 2010

Archives: 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29

Haryanvi wiki discussion

Utcursch, the salient features of the language should be allowed to stay on the page. I understand that you have an issue with the history that was being retold but many language pages on wikipedia do showcase some of the special words or features of the language. So, kindly allow me to add the various similarities with Marathi, Latin, Finnish and English back to the page. We would refrain from making judgmental statements but we must also realize that similar sounding words having the same meaning is more than a "sheer coincidence". 112.79.128.144 (talk) 07:26, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Find a reliable reference that supports your claim, and we've no problem with your additions. As for similarities, have a look at false cognate. utcursch | talk 08:35, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

Re:Gujjar

Hi and thanks for your intervention in Gujjar, but must say I take exception to this comment. As a practicing Sikh I do not believe in caste, and never will. It is Hindu Varna that believes in caste and if sources state that such and such group are such and such status, then so be it. This includes my own group Jat. So in future, please be mindful of such comments. I find them thoroughly hurtful. Regards--Sikh-History 22:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Utcursch! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 746 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Pran Kumar Sharma - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

Mihira Bhoja I

Hi, thanks for formatting Gurjara Pratihara article.Also visit this Here Regards Chhora (talk) 22:01, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

mauryans

what if I provide you the reference of book not published by jat authors ????

heres another book by non jat claiming Jat origin of mauryas---

An Imperial History Of India (c.700 BC - c.770 AD) By K.P. Jayaswal - the Sanskrit Text, Revised by Rahul Sankrityayana

Publisher - Motilal Banarasi Dass, The Punjab Sanskrit Book Depot, Sasdmrha, Lahore, 1934


plus why iranians are supporting Jat origin theory ????

-- Last Emperor (talk) 11:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

you said you can provide you a hundred references which talk about non-Jat origin of the Mauryans, by more respectable, more reputed and more authentic sources

haha....so plz. provide so-called hundred sources,,,,i'm waiting!!!!! -- Last Emperor (talk) 12:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

again plz provide so-called hundred sources as you said,,,,i'm waiting!!!!!

-- Last Emperor (talk) 12:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


im not interested in what u r reminded of or not,,,plz provide so-called hundred sources as you said,,,,i'm waiting!!!!!

-- Last Emperor (talk) 12:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


Huh can you provide anything or you do just taking?????

-- Last Emperor (talk) 12:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


ur userpage say that u r a friendly wikipedian,,,,I didnt saw anything friendy from u yet !!!!

moreover u r imposing ur views on new members and taking wrong advantage of administrator status,,,

ur views show that ur anti-Jat and i dont think wikipedia allows anyone to be partial to anyone....

-- Last Emperor (talk) 12:30, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


you said u will provide 100 references....u only provided 7 of them...where are others??? Anyways forget it...leave this matter...live ur life,,,peacefully and start loving & respecting people or races other than yours own...good luck...and plz be friendly to other new members.-- Last Emperor (talk) 12:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

Talk:Daśāvatāra#Move_to_which_name

Thanks for giving your comments at Talk:Daśāvatāra#Requested_move. As per the consensus: The result of the proposal was move to nondiacritic for the article. Several alternatives have been presented for this particular article (Dashavatara, Dasavatara, Dashavatar) so please help pick an appropriate one. Thanks. --Redtigerxyz Talk 13:48, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

regarding hindi and urdu

if you cannot understand the simple points i made about urdu being a derived language of hindi and copying all of hindi's syntax, structure and grammar, i guess it simply means you have an extremely reduced mental function. urdu cannot exist without using hindi's grammar, structure and syntax which is sanskrit based. hindi can exist independently without persian words. urdu cannot exist without hindi. urdu is simply addition of persian words to hindi and is written in arabic script. addition of latin words to english will not make english as latin. doctors use many latin words but the language they use is called english and not latin!!! and i do not have the inclination to edit this project/waste time which makes people like you administrators! I guess you have regressive political bias issues which prevents you from functioning in an intelligent manner which is recognizing and appreciating the TRUTH. Adios. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hindisudharak (talk • contribs) 11:46, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Please have a look at the links I posted on your talk page, and What Wikipedia is Not. utcursch | talk 11:52, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

thanks

for the infobox. i had a lot of things in mind, will let you know additional fields little afterwards. --CarTick 13:54, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

Gurjara Pratihara article

Hi, have a look to this article and i request you to add it in ur watch list.Some users are vandalizing it and replacing referenced content with or and also moved it to parihar rajputs etc.I also request you to express ur view on "what should be the main heading for the article".I have invited all to express their view regarding this nd posted it to India related topics.thanks Chhora (talk) 02:53, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Grafen (talk) 11:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome :-) utcursch | talk 09:32, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

Hello Friend

Do you not think ben gunn is sexy?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ClosedMouth2 (talk • contribs) 10:21, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

"Ghalloghara" and Saffron terror

Regarding your edits to [1], there are other problems too, like linking to the racist film Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom[2], and related WP:SYN problems in Saffron Terror[3].117.194.198.217 (talk) 07:41, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Dear administrator, I am seeing a little challenge here. This anon is deleting 1, 2, 3 huge chunk of information for no reason. It is a clear wp:vandalism, wp:pov pushing and probably way more... I hope you could intervene to save referenced wikipedia information...--DawnOfTheBlood (talk) 07:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
I am in favor of expanding the article, but the text removed by the anon is synthesis of various articles without any references for the use of the term "Hindu terrorism" to describe the incidents. Besides, much of the text is copy-pasted from other sources (e.g. ToI). For resolving the disputes, I encourage both of you to have a look at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. utcursch | talk 07:55, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Please see WP:NOR. Linking a bunch of incidents in India (like Babri Masjid, Christian conflicts etc.) to alleged Saffron terror without attributable sources is a massive violation of several wp policies. Furthermore, wikipedia is not about "The truth", it's about verifiability.117.194.198.217 (talk) 07:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
I have raised the issue at Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Saffron_Terror.117.194.198.217 (talk) 07:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Utcursch/archive/30&oldid=369515959"