User talk:Gpduf: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:40, 25 June 2010

Problems with upload of File:Congressman Mark Siljander.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Congressman Mark Siljander.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. The photo came from Mark Silander personally. However, as public relations stills for general use, labeled as such exist on his website, www.adeadlymisunderstanding.com, they could be used freely also.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personal comments

Hi. Please stop putting personal comments into articles, such as this and this. The article talk pages are the appropriate place for such comments. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:17, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder why so many wiki pages are showing signs of blatant propagandizing. As for the Siljader photo, it was supplied by Congressman Siljander personally.

Time to take a hard look at some of the misinformation that is now filling wikipedia. There is alot to defend, freedom of speech is one thing but delving into continual bias is something else. Wiki is a great organization and worth defending.

Speedy deletion nomination of Veterans Today

A tag has been placed on Veterans Today requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Claritas (talk) 15:59, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know nothing about this content. Duffster

June 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Israel Shamir, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 12:29, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Israel Shamir. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jusdafax 12:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Shamir page is a shameful violation of Wiki standards. Accusations of anti-Semitism are, depending on country, actionable and, in themselves, felonies. As Shamir is a resident of the EU, the Wiki article content constitutes a criminal act.

Political control of Wiki by any group is a violation of the spirit of wikipedia. If necessary, we can discuss this on Veterans Today in much greater detail. It will receive the attention it deserves. If you want to discuss this and other issues where Wikipedia is misused, no longer informing but to push forward fringe ideas, please contact me directly at gpduf@aol.com. BTW,you have an interesting webpage. g